Sunday, 9 March 2014
Lena Dunham hates MRAs
Apparently she believes that MRAs want to shutdown birth control clinics?
She thinks these are MRAs. No doubt when she looks at them, she sees fedoras and neckbeards.
For fuck's sake, it would be a step up for that to be a straw man.
Lena: "I really hate MRAs. I also hate people who rape babies. Hey, I'll just say they rape babies!"
Friday, 7 March 2014
Why oppose Feminism?
- Feminists skewed the Definition of Domestic Abuse, resulting in only male abusers being arrested and female abusers not.
- Feminist Mary Koss denies male rape victims.
- Feminists fought a law for equal custody to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit. Multiple times.
- Feminists started a campaign against Father’s rights groups
- Feminists fought against laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.
- Feminists fought against a law to end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.
- Feminist fought against men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.
- Feminists in India and Israel fought against female rapists being arrested, charged and convicted of rape.
- Feminists fought against a economic stimulus for male-dominated job such as construction, etc.
Friday, 28 February 2014
A questionaire, adapted.
1) Sexuality?
Straight
2) If you could meet anyone on this earth, who would it be?
An attractive woman with a legal supply of vaped cannabis, an interest in tabletop role-playing and a desire to play Star Fleet Battles without grinding me into the dirt when she beats me ;-)
4) What do you think about most?
Sex/romance
6) Do you sleep with or without clothes on?
Without if it's an option
8) Girls.... (finish the sentence); Boys.... (finish the sentence)
Girls.... are incredibly desirable but frustrating ... Boys.... are potentially physically dangerous but easier to make friends with
9) Ever had a poem or song written about you?
Poems, yes. Erotica. I destroyed it when the relationship crashed and burned.
11) Do you have any strange phobias?
I used to; that's related to an anxiety disorder. Things like many twigs on the ground bothered me.
13) What's your religion?
I don't have one.
14) If you are outside, what are you most likely doing?
Walking to the shops
15) Do you prefer to be behind the camera or in front of it?
Depends; is there a nude woman in front of me?
16) Simple but extremely complex. Favorite band?
Pink Floyd, especially around Dark Side of the Moon
17) What was the last lie you told?
This sentence is a lie.
18) Do you believe in karma?
Nope.
21) Who is your celebrity crush?
I have multitudes. Currently - no-one really stirs me. There's quite a lot of women who made my pulse race as they were a long time ago, like Angelina Jolie, Salma Hayek, Michelle Pfeifer. If i think "which celeb *now* would i like to want me as much as i want her"? Hmm. Maybe Emma Watson?

22) Have you ever gone skinny dipping?
Not as an adult.
23) How do you vent your anger?
Blogging! :D
24) Do you have a collection of anything?
D&D books?
25) Do you prefer talking on the phone or video chatting online?
I've never video chatted, I'm pretty shy
26) Are you happy with the person you've become?
With the personality or the physicality? The body - bah, i'd replace it in a heartbeat if i had an option. The character - I'm ok, could be worse, could be better.. I wish i was one of those strong willed people who overcomes disability, but they are freakishly rare. A lot of people go under, become addicts, end up in jail or the morgue.
27) What's a sound you hate; sound you love?
a sound I hate: a dog barking over and over and over, full of spite and rage. But that dog has moved and hopefully it died hideously, devouring it's owner's face.
A sound i love... my lover's soft voice, saying my name as she cums.
28) What's your biggest "what if"?
What if "The Culture" was real? Would I join it? Would life still be meaningful? Would our culture cease to exist in that scenario?
Yes, not sure, I doubt it. And i would mourn it.
29) Do you believe in ghosts? How about aliens?
No, yes, but not aliens that visit earth. I find it incredibly unlikely they expend the incredible resources needed to get here just so they can stick things up our butts. Unless the ones visiting here are the equivalent of intergalactic pedophiles.
32) What's the worst place you have ever been to?
the hospital bed i was in after surgery to remove a facial tumour. I was under-medicated. The pain was off the scale, and has stayed with me to an extent.
34) Most attractive singer of your opposite gender?
Young Kate Bush. I'm not really up on the current scene
35) To you, what is the meaning of life?
User-defined. Do unto others as they would do unto you. Build meaning with effort and awareness. It will not be given unto you. The universe is random. We can choose to have purpose.
36) Define Art.
No.
37) Do you believe in luck?
Nope.
38) What's the weather like right now?
Rainy and humid and sticky.
39) What time is it? Adventure Time!
40) Do you drive? If so, have you ever crashed?
I have driven but I can't any more. No, never crashed, but I was only a Learner and I was supervised.
41) What was the last book you read?
Fully? Not sure. Medical problems make reading difficult.
42) Do you like the smell of gasoline?
Sometimes. I really love the scent of the old hand-outs we were given as a child - i can't recall what they were called. They were rolled out of a machine, that was replaced by copiers.
43) Do you have any nicknames?
Nope.
44) What was the last movie you saw?
Iron Man 3 maybe? I loathed the last third of it, but a lot of it was good. Oh no, it was Frozen; lousy deus ex machina, i worked out a better ending as i watched it (Anna represents Summer, but both Seasons combined give you Life)
45) What's the worst injury you've ever had?
Does permanent damage to the nerves controlling the left hand side of my face count? That's the whole head actually; i feel it from top scalp to my neck, and it can slur my speech sometimes
46) Have you ever caught a butterfly?
Yes
47) Do you have any obsessions right now?
anti-feminism
49) Ever had a rumor spread about you?
Oh yes. I had an ex who was a vicious bitch. Her best friend repeated it and i asked her if she believed it. I looked in her eyes and saw she did not. She told me that she had to believe it or lose her friend.
50) Do you believe in magic?
nope
51) Do you tend to hold grudges against people who have done you wrong?
Certainly; that's called sanity
52) What is your astrological sign?
see 50)
54) What's the last thing you purchased?
Brunch! A steak breakfast, two large cappucinos. A luxury, but there's not much else I can spend on that's within my budget. There's no movies out and i hate seeing them alone in any case.
55) Love or lust?
BOTH. I've had one without the other too often.
56) In a relationship?
No, and unlikely to be; disability pensions are cut if you are.
57) How many relationships have you had?
Maybe 6 or 7?
58) Can you touch your nose with your tongue?
Not without cutting off one or the other
59) Where were you yesterday?
Here
60) Is there anything pink within 10 feet of you?
Naturally! I'm pink!
61) Are you wearing socks right now?
No, it's muggy in here
62) What's your favorite animal?
a woman, woo!
63) What is your secret weapon to get someone to like you?
chloroform
64) Where is your best friend?
in my imagination!
66) What is your heritage?
Australian for a few hundred years
68) What do you think is Satan's last name?
Since Satan just means adversary, and the biblical stories actually have him on good terms with Jehovah for the most part (see Job), I'd actually say Satan was just an aspect of Jehovah, so the same as that one I guess. If anything, Jehovah treats him as someone to talk to rather than an enemy.
71) You are walking down the street on your way to work. There is a dog drowning in the canal on the side of the street. Your boss has told you if you are late one more time you get fired. What do you do?
Save the dog. I've been in a similar situation.
72) You are at the doctor’s office and she has just informed you that you have approximately one month to live. a) Do you tell anyone/everyone you are going to die? b) What do you do with your remaining days? c) Would you be afraid?
a) yes b) pretty much what i'm doing now, i've been told stuff like that before c) yes, but over it as well... life is invariably fatal
74) What's a song that always makes you happy when you hear it?
See the one at top!
76) In your opinion, what makes a great relationship?
Shared interests and sexual chemistry
77) How can I win your heart?
be a female i find attractive physically, understand me , want me, be dirty with me,
be there tomorrow
and tomorrow
and tomorrow
78) Can insanity bring on more creativity?
To an extent, but studies show it kills it off too.
79) What is the single best decision you have made in your life so far?
I chose to live
81) What would you want to be written on your tombstone?
Still an atheist
82) What is your favorite word?
Fuck. It's incredibly versatile.
83) Give me the first thing that comes to mind when you hear the word; heart.
broken
85) What's the last song you listened to?
Mr Blue Sky
86) Basic question; what's your favorite color/colors?
All of them. I work with palettes
87) What is your current desktop picture?
I think she's awesome in 'Lolani' .. I'd love to be that character's partner
88) If you could press a button and make anyone in the world instantaneously explode, who would it be?
You'll never know; but there is someone. Some people get away with terrible crimes. TANJ, as they say
90) One night you wake up because you heard a noise. You turn on the light to find that you are surrounded by MUMMIES. The mummies aren't really doing anything, they're just standing around your bed. What do you do?
Laugh. Go look for a camera.
91) You accidentally eat some radioactive vegetables. They were good, and what's even cooler is that they endow you with the super-power of your choice! What is that power?
The power to have Superman's powers without the kryptonite or weakness to magic, as he was portrayed at the height of his powers, where he was ageless, didn't need to breathe or eat, could travel faster than the speed of light, was super-intelligent, and yet could still make love to a woman without any danger to her or others.. he was seriously overpowered and they have now nerfed him to the point where Wonder Woman can beat him up.
92) You can re-live any point of time in your life. The time-span can only be a half-hour, though. What half-hour of your past would you like to experience again?
I can't think of one, because as wonderful as some of those moments were, they were with people who it's painful to recall. I might re-visit a certain lover, only to have to go through that heart break all over afterwards as i remember how it ended.
93) You can erase any horrible experience from your past. What will it be?
None. I need to learn from them.
94) You have the opportunity to sleep with the music-celebrity of your choice. Who would it be?
Who is out at the moment? Hmm. I guess katy perry?
I don't have the emotional connection to current music I'd need to get excited by this question. Years past, I would have screamed with happiness to have Alanis Morissette or Kate Bush
drag me into the bedroom. Kylie Minogue in this dress and at this time
98) Ever been on a plane?
Yes, my father worked for an airline so we had cheap tickets. I went to Darwin a few times. Once I looked out the window - and i couldn't figure out what it was I was seeing. I looked out the other, and it was the opposite hue. One side was a dark, dark blue, the other, a deep rich blood red.
That was Central Australia, and the plane was banking hard. It was a profound moment.
99) If the whole world were listening to you right now, what would you say?
Religion is nothing but a delusion; try reason for a change!
Monday, 30 December 2013
Career men don't exist?
Gosh, I wonder if there's something called a salaryman with an equivalent meaning?
At yet, thanks to the Tender Years Doctrine, feminists made damn sure men could NOT just be parents.. and if they work and rear kids, then they'll get blamed for having to work long hours instead of being there for them.. catch-22.

Men must work themselves to death, thanks to feminism.
Women will spit on their corpses, thanks to feminism.

Other men will feel shame if they fail, and shame if they succeed -

Wednesday, 11 December 2013
KATE HAKALA KNOWS WHAT'S BEST FOR YOU
She claims:
Science doesn't work that way, it works by consensus, and it's never 'done'. There's just a general agreement that some theory best matches the facts.
And stuff like " no difference in sexual desire" rings alarm bells. If a penis is cut off entirely, men still want sex, they just can't bloody have an erection.
To simulate the effect, if it really is trivial, you'd have to have women cutting off their clitoral hoods, not the clitoris. No anesthetic. (i noticed the pain of it is completely ignored, i wonder why that is?)
I noticed KATE HAKALA isn't volunteering. Surely she knows it's more hygienic if she does? And it won't make any difference to her pleasure... right?
So let's go back to the science. This one starts by claiming everyone else got it wrong. That's a big claim. So what did the scientists say about that? Oh that's right, they weren't asked.
And i have to admit I'm surprised by the subjectivity. If you ask a man if he's sexual potent, most men are going to say "of course!!!1!" A smarter method is to measure responses via fMRI etc. This isn't the 1960s, we've moved a bit beyond relying on surveys. If you really want to be thorough, you can examine nerve paths in a systematic way.
Ms HAKALA comes across as having an agenda.
"Despite Urban Legend"?
http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/senkul1/
RESULTS: The differences in the mean BMSFI scores were not statistically significant in any of the five sections. However, the mean ejaculatory latency time was significantly longer after circumcision (P = 0.02).
Oh right, these scientists are just spreading rumours for teh lulz.
So on the one side, there's a study that involves asking men if they are real men, and on the other, there's one that uses measurable quantities and statistical analysis.
I know which I'd trust.
I have to wonder what religion the scientists involves has, if any. From a Jewish perspective, there's a very strong motivation to find data to support the practice, as making MGM has been discussed as being banned, and this would mean many Jews would have to face either breaking secular or religious laws.
It can be very tempting to cherry-pick results you like, ones that reinforce existing prejudices. I could sit here spouting sources all day, like http://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Circumcision-DOES-reduce...
But the fact is, this is a dodgy write-up of a dodgy paper, and it has no credibility. If it was from Scientific American, say, they would have contacted other scientists to get their perspective.
So what sort of journo is KATE HAKALA?
>Just don't Google "smegma."<
Why the fuck not? I have the feeling she thinks that's some hideous male affliction. So what's her level of scientific expertise?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma
Smegma (Greek smēgma, "soap"[1]) is a combination of exfoliated (shed) epithelial cells, transudated skin oils, and moisture. It occurs in both female and male mammalian genitalia.
Both sexes can produce smegma. In males, smegma is produced and can collect under the foreskin; in females, it collects around the clitoris and in the folds of the labia minora.
In males, smegma helps keep the glans moist and facilitates sexual intercourse by acting as a lubricant.
So fuck Ms HAKALA and her body-shaming ways. I don't see her volunteering for the chop. She sees men as existing for the pleasure of women, and wants to use any dirty trick to accomplish that goal.
FGM was seen as perfectly normal once, too. It's still fervently argued by people in thos cultures that it is necessary, and all sorts of excuses are found as to why. But in the end, it boils down to "it's done because it's done".
And you know, it was once seen as freakish and foreign in the west. Something no good christian would do! Then it was promoted as a way of stopping male masturbation, which was seen as sinful to the point of damnation, by .. reducing penile sensitivity... hmm.
It wasn't introduced for medical reasons, but for religious ones, reasons which could be used to apply to FGM had they realised that women did those things they despised as well - but the vision that they had was that male sexuality was wicked, and women had no sexuality, and were purer as a result.
So either it was useless for it's stated purpose - or it is partial castration.
By both measures should be banned immediately.
"Despite Urban Legend, Circumcision Has No Influence on Sexual Pleasure"
Complications of Circumcision
- Bleeding
- Infection
- Insufficient foreskin removed
- Excessive foreskin removed
- Adhesions/ Skin bridges
- Inclusion cysts
- Abnormal healing
- Meatitis
- Meatal stenosis
- Urinary retention
- Phimosis
- Chordee
- Hypospadias
- Epispadias
- Urethrocutaneous fistula
- Necrosis of the penis
- Amputation of the glans
- Death
"It's settled. It's done. We can all pack up our foreskins and go home now. "
Science doesn't work that way, it works by consensus, and it's never 'done'. There's just a general agreement that some theory best matches the facts.
And stuff like " no difference in sexual desire" rings alarm bells. If a penis is cut off entirely, men still want sex, they just can't bloody have an erection.
To simulate the effect, if it really is trivial, you'd have to have women cutting off their clitoral hoods, not the clitoris. No anesthetic. (i noticed the pain of it is completely ignored, i wonder why that is?)
I noticed KATE HAKALA isn't volunteering. Surely she knows it's more hygienic if she does? And it won't make any difference to her pleasure... right?
So let's go back to the science. This one starts by claiming everyone else got it wrong. That's a big claim. So what did the scientists say about that? Oh that's right, they weren't asked.
And i have to admit I'm surprised by the subjectivity. If you ask a man if he's sexual potent, most men are going to say "of course!!!1!" A smarter method is to measure responses via fMRI etc. This isn't the 1960s, we've moved a bit beyond relying on surveys. If you really want to be thorough, you can examine nerve paths in a systematic way.
Ms HAKALA comes across as having an agenda.
"Despite Urban Legend"?
http://www.cirp.org/library/sex_function/senkul1/
RESULTS: The differences in the mean BMSFI scores were not statistically significant in any of the five sections. However, the mean ejaculatory latency time was significantly longer after circumcision (P = 0.02).
Oh right, these scientists are just spreading rumours for teh lulz.
So on the one side, there's a study that involves asking men if they are real men, and on the other, there's one that uses measurable quantities and statistical analysis.
I know which I'd trust.
I have to wonder what religion the scientists involves has, if any. From a Jewish perspective, there's a very strong motivation to find data to support the practice, as making MGM has been discussed as being banned, and this would mean many Jews would have to face either breaking secular or religious laws.
It can be very tempting to cherry-pick results you like, ones that reinforce existing prejudices. I could sit here spouting sources all day, like http://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Circumcision-DOES-reduce...
But the fact is, this is a dodgy write-up of a dodgy paper, and it has no credibility. If it was from Scientific American, say, they would have contacted other scientists to get their perspective.
So what sort of journo is KATE HAKALA?
>Just don't Google "smegma."<
Why the fuck not? I have the feeling she thinks that's some hideous male affliction. So what's her level of scientific expertise?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma
Smegma (Greek smēgma, "soap"[1]) is a combination of exfoliated (shed) epithelial cells, transudated skin oils, and moisture. It occurs in both female and male mammalian genitalia.
Both sexes can produce smegma. In males, smegma is produced and can collect under the foreskin; in females, it collects around the clitoris and in the folds of the labia minora.
In males, smegma helps keep the glans moist and facilitates sexual intercourse by acting as a lubricant.
So fuck Ms HAKALA and her body-shaming ways. I don't see her volunteering for the chop. She sees men as existing for the pleasure of women, and wants to use any dirty trick to accomplish that goal.
FGM was seen as perfectly normal once, too. It's still fervently argued by people in thos cultures that it is necessary, and all sorts of excuses are found as to why. But in the end, it boils down to "it's done because it's done".
And you know, it was once seen as freakish and foreign in the west. Something no good christian would do! Then it was promoted as a way of stopping male masturbation, which was seen as sinful to the point of damnation, by .. reducing penile sensitivity... hmm.
It wasn't introduced for medical reasons, but for religious ones, reasons which could be used to apply to FGM had they realised that women did those things they despised as well - but the vision that they had was that male sexuality was wicked, and women had no sexuality, and were purer as a result.
So either it was useless for it's stated purpose - or it is partial castration.
By both measures should be banned immediately.
Thursday, 5 December 2013
Lingerie Football?!!
I have zero interest in football. Zero interest in most sports, really. But I'm glad it entertains most people and don't have a problem with that.
Apparently there's some program called 'lingerie football'? I have no idea how that works. The football is just an excuse, I'm guessing. Now it's been said that the existence of this is sexist. Ok, here's my argument why it isn't.
The test for sexism is to gender-swap the scenario.
If there was some TV show where, to appear, men had to wear male lingerie, would men refuse? Not for a heartbeat. Men like attention (and money!) just as much as women. I doubt there's any profit in it, however.
Feminists continually emphasise that women just don't care as much about male appearance as vice versa; it's usually in the context of why women are *better* than men. So a show based on the visual appeal of men is just not going to be as profitable, surely. However, the beauty of today's cheap cameras etc is there's nothing stopping a Feminist group from creating this show and broadcasting it, so long as they skip the radio waves. Kickstarter, IndieGoGo et al all exist for this purpose. Digital TV is dirt cheap.
And all you have to do in business is make more money than you spend, and you are a success.
So instead of doing this, Feminists want to ban the lingerie football thing on the ground men looking at women and having teh sexi thoughts means women lose out. That's right, every sexual desire a man experiences ruins the purity of women.
Why is that?
I confess: I like porn.
Shocking, huh.
I have no problem at all with male sexuality, male masturbation, etc. Not particularly keen on observing it, any more than football, but I'm not opposed to it either, just like football.
It does fascinate me how far people will go to repress it.
Look at circumcision. In the west, this was seen by non-Jews as an abhorrent practice, the ritual mutilation of babies as a limited human sacrifice. Then it was plugged as way to stop boys masturbating, and it achieved respectability. Then it was the norm, and almost no-one remembered why they had agreed to it.. it was done because it was done.
Why is it Feminists and other authoritarians are so violently opposed to liberty? To 'live and let live'? To others doing things they don't want to do for themselves? To burning books, instead of writing them, to slapping hatecrime laws on their opponents instead of articulating and refining their arguments?
I saw someone last night, who believed, along with her audience, that arguments for the existence of the Patriarchy were unnecessary, because it was so true that it existed that any argument would only serve the Patriarchy. To doubt is heresy; to reason, satanic.
This is the mentality that lead to the Spanish Inquisition, to the re-education camps of the Communists, to the mental asylums and lobotomies of sane people whose crime was simply that they didn't conform.
We have to do better than that.
Apparently there's some program called 'lingerie football'? I have no idea how that works. The football is just an excuse, I'm guessing. Now it's been said that the existence of this is sexist. Ok, here's my argument why it isn't.
The test for sexism is to gender-swap the scenario.
If there was some TV show where, to appear, men had to wear male lingerie, would men refuse? Not for a heartbeat. Men like attention (and money!) just as much as women. I doubt there's any profit in it, however.
Feminists continually emphasise that women just don't care as much about male appearance as vice versa; it's usually in the context of why women are *better* than men. So a show based on the visual appeal of men is just not going to be as profitable, surely. However, the beauty of today's cheap cameras etc is there's nothing stopping a Feminist group from creating this show and broadcasting it, so long as they skip the radio waves. Kickstarter, IndieGoGo et al all exist for this purpose. Digital TV is dirt cheap.
And all you have to do in business is make more money than you spend, and you are a success.
So instead of doing this, Feminists want to ban the lingerie football thing on the ground men looking at women and having teh sexi thoughts means women lose out. That's right, every sexual desire a man experiences ruins the purity of women.
Why is that?
I confess: I like porn.
Shocking, huh.
I have no problem at all with male sexuality, male masturbation, etc. Not particularly keen on observing it, any more than football, but I'm not opposed to it either, just like football.
It does fascinate me how far people will go to repress it.
Look at circumcision. In the west, this was seen by non-Jews as an abhorrent practice, the ritual mutilation of babies as a limited human sacrifice. Then it was plugged as way to stop boys masturbating, and it achieved respectability. Then it was the norm, and almost no-one remembered why they had agreed to it.. it was done because it was done.
Why is it Feminists and other authoritarians are so violently opposed to liberty? To 'live and let live'? To others doing things they don't want to do for themselves? To burning books, instead of writing them, to slapping hatecrime laws on their opponents instead of articulating and refining their arguments?
I saw someone last night, who believed, along with her audience, that arguments for the existence of the Patriarchy were unnecessary, because it was so true that it existed that any argument would only serve the Patriarchy. To doubt is heresy; to reason, satanic.
This is the mentality that lead to the Spanish Inquisition, to the re-education camps of the Communists, to the mental asylums and lobotomies of sane people whose crime was simply that they didn't conform.
We have to do better than that.
Monday, 2 December 2013
Rape is NOT a gendered issue, so stop treating it like one.
dontneedfeminism:
40% of rapists are women
The Predictors of Sexual Coercion Against Women and Men
Study of 7,667 university students from 38 sites: 3.0% of men reported forced sex
Study of US college women - 12% of the respondents reported ever using any type of force strategy while 43% reported using a coercion strategy and 92% reported using a seduction strategy to initiate sex.
Men often coerced into sex: study
Rape in the military is rampant, and it affects more men than women due to their disproportionate numbers.
Among inmates reporting staff sexual misconduct, ~ 65% reported a female aggressor (A few highlights)Female inmates in prison (4.7%) or jail (3.1%) were more than twice as likely as male inmates in prison (1.9%) or jail (1.3%) to report experiencing inmate- on-inmate sexual victimization.
Sexual activity with facility staff was reported by 2.9% of male prisoners and 2.1% of male jail inmates, compared to 2.1% of female prisoners and 1.5% of female jail inmates.Up to 15.7% of US prisoners experience rape in 12 month period
Men Outnumber Women Among American Rape Victims(about prison rape)
94% of sexually abused youth in correctional facilities reported being abused by female staff. Only 40% of the staff is female
2004 Study of teacher sexual misconduct. Those that are punished/reprimanded (96% male, 4% female) and those reported by students (57% male, 43% female)
3 in 4 B.C. boys on street sexually exploited by women
65% of the survivors who tried to tell a therapist, doctor, teacher or other professional were not believed the first time they disclosed. Overall, 86% of those who tried to tell anyone were not believed the first time they disclosed.
Male Statutory rape victims forced to pay child support
Female Pedophiles Cause Children More Harm, According to Research by University of Bergen, NorwayAccording to multiple studies, 59% to 80% of male sex offenders were sexually abused by females.
“59% of the rapists had been heterosexually molested.”
Other studies showed: 66% (Groth, 1979) and 80% (Briere and Smiljanich, 1993).
Yet 99% of those convicted for rape, are men (page 27)
Men and women are both capable of being victims and perpetrators. Rape is NOT a gendered issue, so stop treating it like one.
(reblogged from Tumblr)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)