The national, tax-payer funded organisation, whose charter says they represent all Australians... made that insane, libelous claim.
Because the ABC is feminist.
 | |
| Sarah Silverman preaches violent insurrection in the name of feminism. |
Showing posts with label ABC Australia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ABC Australia. Show all posts
Monday, 6 February 2017
ABC Australia openly claimed that Trump followers want chaos.
The national, tax-payer funded organisation, whose charter says they represent all Australians... made that insane, libelous claim.
Because the ABC is feminist.
Saturday, 10 December 2016
Feminist ABC claims cats are an antidote to masculinity
A response to https://archive.is/JFvDH
Archived from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-11/the-rise-of-cat-men-antidote-to-toxic-masculinity/8082618?sf45961113=1 11 Dec 2016 02:33:13 UTC
Masculinity is the quality of being male. It is not a disease. We do not need to be 'cured'.
An online movement of men is shrugging off the stereotype that 'cats are for girls'
Which isn't a stereotype outside of your imaginations. No-one cares.
We do not need your permission for anything. Our masculinity is OURS to define as we please. You do not get to police how we "male".
Rubbish. Cat ladies have far more cats than they should - in fact, it's suspected they are the victims of a parasite in the brain.
"[Toxo infection] may be linked to schizophrenia and other disturbances associated with altered dopaminc levels — for example, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and mood disorders.”" Joanne Webster, a parsitologist at the Imperial College London.
No evidence is presented for this, of course. It is simply asserted, in exactly the way antisemitic propaganda was asserted. The audience Listened and Believed everything that suited their prejudices. The idea of the Patriarchy dictating that men should not have cats makes perfect sense to the SocJus maniacs who lap this stuff up.
Yes. Some might. We call them "sane people". It meets every definition of frivolous to post pictures of your pets.
Experts? Gotta love those ABC weasel words. What experts? What are their credentials? With what skepticism were their claims met? What testing was done.
'Experts' claim everything, apparently.
Hey, ABC! Experts say your days are numbered; that more and more of your programs are getting the ax. Because instead of news - you post fluff stories and feminist propaganda. At a time fewer and fewer Australians identify as feminist.
Sure, you are very popular with that echo chamber - but it's getting tighter and tighter inside.
Sooner or later, you will implode into nothingness.
Or so the experts say - not taking any responsibility for that opinion myself, of course.
Gotta love those experts.
Because they are castrated. Do you have any idea what an uncastrated Tom is like? Of course you don't - that would be data that doesn't help you reach your desired conclusion. Throw that cherry aside, ABC!
So who is your expert?
Dr Heather Fraser?
http://www.flinders.edu.au/people/h.fraser
Huh! So her expertise is in feminism, and everything she does is viewed through a feminist lens. She has no scientific credentials, is never treated critically, and has no more credibility than a scientologist or a flat-earther.
She shares your faith - so you paint her as an expert. It's circular. How do we know this feminist belief is true? A feminist said it was.
the "rise of the metrosexual" man - sorry, you think dandies are new? Well, since your experts are feminists, not historians, that doesn't surprise me.
"It may also allow men to express a kinder, more thoughtful form of masculinity"
MAY. Speculation without any evidence. It may also cause them to levitate to the moon, or devour the souls of the innocent. Where the hell are your facts?
Where is the data showing that men who don't have cats are cruel?
Oh. Right. So you regard masculine men as bad men. Why does that not surprise me? You automatically rated feminine men as kind, because in your sexism, women are GOOD and men are BAD.
Bigots will do that; the members of their ingroup are always assigned positive values; the Others are demonised, and bigots have nothing good to say about them.
The only 'acceptable' man to a feminist is a feminised man. A neutered man. A spayed man.
Jesus bloody Christ!
The rest of your fluff piece just repeats itself - so I'll leave you to your man-hating.
May your kind be locked up in a room with other bigots until nothing is left but the remains of your vanilla lattes.
Archived from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-11/the-rise-of-cat-men-antidote-to-toxic-masculinity/8082618?sf45961113=1 11 Dec 2016 02:33:13 UTC
"an antidote to toxic masculinity"
Masculinity is the quality of being male. It is not a disease. We do not need to be 'cured'.
An online movement of men is shrugging off the stereotype that 'cats are for girls'
Which isn't a stereotype outside of your imaginations. No-one cares.
"they're giving others permission to embrace a gentler, more thoughtful kind of masculinity."
We do not need your permission for anything. Our masculinity is OURS to define as we please. You do not get to police how we "male".
"Myles Loughran is a cat man. 'Cat man' as in, 'cat lady', but with a Y-chromosome."
Rubbish. Cat ladies have far more cats than they should - in fact, it's suspected they are the victims of a parasite in the brain.
"[Toxo infection] may be linked to schizophrenia and other disturbances associated with altered dopaminc levels — for example, obsessive-compulsive disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and mood disorders.”" Joanne Webster, a parsitologist at the Imperial College London.
"For too long, there's been a stereotype about cat guys."
No evidence is presented for this, of course. It is simply asserted, in exactly the way antisemitic propaganda was asserted. The audience Listened and Believed everything that suited their prejudices. The idea of the Patriarchy dictating that men should not have cats makes perfect sense to the SocJus maniacs who lap this stuff up.
"some might dismiss men's pussy PDAs as frivolous"
Yes. Some might. We call them "sane people". It meets every definition of frivolous to post pictures of your pets.
1.
characterized by lack of seriousness or sense:
frivolous conduct.
2.
self-indulgently carefree; unconcerned about or lacking any serious purpose.
3.
(of a person) given to trifling or undue levity:
a frivolous, empty-headed person.
4.
of little or no weight, worth, or importance; not worthy of serious notice:
a frivolous suggestion.
 |
| Kittens are cute, but pictures of them lack serious purpose, and it reflects on the state of the ABC that they now focus on them |
US Captain L Woods with Australian prisoners of war
This is the sort of thing the ABC used to focus on,
before it decided that was all too toxic and masculine.
Now all it does is cats on rhoombas.
Why does the ABC still exist?
Why is it paid for by men when all it does is shit on them?
"experts say "
Experts? Gotta love those ABC weasel words. What experts? What are their credentials? With what skepticism were their claims met? What testing was done.
'Experts' claim everything, apparently.
Hey, ABC! Experts say your days are numbered; that more and more of your programs are getting the ax. Because instead of news - you post fluff stories and feminist propaganda. At a time fewer and fewer Australians identify as feminist.
Sure, you are very popular with that echo chamber - but it's getting tighter and tighter inside.
Sooner or later, you will implode into nothingness.
Or so the experts say - not taking any responsibility for that opinion myself, of course.
 |
| Why is it the ABC only wants to know about castrated males, and can't even be bothered to check how different masculine (un-neutered) cats look like? Is it because, in their view, every male should be given the snip? |
Gotta love those experts.
"Why are cats considered feminine?"
Because they are castrated. Do you have any idea what an uncastrated Tom is like? Of course you don't - that would be data that doesn't help you reach your desired conclusion. Throw that cherry aside, ABC!
So who is your expert?
Dr Heather Fraser?
http://www.flinders.edu.au/people/h.fraser
Over the course of her academic career Heather has taught many courses, including: Critical Social Work, Anti-Oppressive Practice, Feminist Policies and Perspectives, Theorising Inequality, Social Policy, Social Work Research, Advocacy and Social Action, Community Work, Groupwork, Communication Skills and Narrative Analysis. At Flinders she has also taught: Social Work Theories of Intervention Gender and Sexuality; and Child Welfare.
Huh! So her expertise is in feminism, and everything she does is viewed through a feminist lens. She has no scientific credentials, is never treated critically, and has no more credibility than a scientologist or a flat-earther.
She shares your faith - so you paint her as an expert. It's circular. How do we know this feminist belief is true? A feminist said it was.
the "rise of the metrosexual" man - sorry, you think dandies are new? Well, since your experts are feminists, not historians, that doesn't surprise me.
"It may also allow men to express a kinder, more thoughtful form of masculinity"
MAY. Speculation without any evidence. It may also cause them to levitate to the moon, or devour the souls of the innocent. Where the hell are your facts?
Where is the data showing that men who don't have cats are cruel?
"A previous study, in 1998, found that men who were identified as liking cats were rated by participants as less masculine and more feminine than men who liked dogs"
Oh. Right. So you regard masculine men as bad men. Why does that not surprise me? You automatically rated feminine men as kind, because in your sexism, women are GOOD and men are BAD.
Bigots will do that; the members of their ingroup are always assigned positive values; the Others are demonised, and bigots have nothing good to say about them.
The only 'acceptable' man to a feminist is a feminised man. A neutered man. A spayed man.
Jesus bloody Christ!
The rest of your fluff piece just repeats itself - so I'll leave you to your man-hating.
May your kind be locked up in a room with other bigots until nothing is left but the remains of your vanilla lattes.
Wednesday, 20 April 2016
Australian Politicians and the ABC agree - all men and boys are evil, all women, bloody saints!
Are they focussing on domestic violence or violence against white women by white men? Because most DV is reciprocal, women initiate more than men, DV is higher in the lesbian community...
But you know all this, oh ABC, and the facts don't matter to you, because anti-male propaganda is the ABC's style now.
'Dismissive' phrases such as "boys will be boys"? That's a statement of fact. Only a Feminist would see that as something to be condemned.
"he did it because he likes you"
Yup. And girls do that too. Which you would know if you cared about the truth, even a smidgin. Young people often have no way of negotiating a relationship or dealing with rejection - and that applies to both sexes, and to gay and lesbians as well.
"women are often blamed for attacks against them".
Yes. By criminologists. Who are treating them as if they were as responsible for their actions as men are. If you hit someone, and they hit you back, you are responsible for the result.
Yes. By criminologists. Who are treating them as if they were as responsible for their actions as men are. If you hit someone, and they hit you back, you are responsible for the result.
IF YOU DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO HIT YOU, TRY NOT HITTING THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE.
"men are excused"
Absolutely bloody garbage, and if the ABC wasn't full of screaming man-haters, they'd point that out - with a few seconds of research, you can show attacks by men on women are treated with incredible seriousness - but the reverse? Is just laughed at.
"Domestic violence survivor Ann O'Neill has backed the new campaign, saying it will be a crucial tool in preventing violence against women."
How will demonising men stop violence against women? Considering lesbian DV is higher? Pushing men out of relationships with women might serve Feminism - but it certainly won't decrease the violence women experience.
"Each week in Australia, one woman is killed at the hands of her current or former partner."
No source is ever given, and no mention of how many men are killed in the same way, or that lesbians kill their partners too, or that kids are mostly killed by their mothers.
All that is always swept under the rug by the ABC.
" the Coalition has faced heavy criticism for cutting funding to the very services that domestic violence victims need to access, including homeless shelters and community lawyers."
None of which exist for men. Our homeless shelter is the prison, our domestic violence shelter is the grave.
Further Reading:
Monday, 7 March 2016
ABC News claims men are unfit to lead.
A new report shows that companies with gender-diverse boards performed 7% better than companies with male only boards. Juliet Bourke from Deloitte Australia joined us to discuss
Posted by ABC News 24 on Monday, 7 March 2016
Let's imagine we live in a universe where this is true.
How do you reconcile this with the claim by Feminists that it regards men and women as equals?
Here you are - evidence ...
(which I'd guess is manufactured by Feminists and is as reliable as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion)
"The research, by the Centre for Gender Economics and Innovation and Infinitas Asset Management"
(Have a look at the composition of the advisory board of this Centre for Gender Economics - one token male vs 6 women advisers.)
Gender Economics?? Well that research'll be falsifiable, testable and peer reviewed no doubt... only kidding, it's Feminist! Logic is Patriarchy!
Can you imagine if any other group did that? If Catholic Economics came up with a report claiming boards with Catholics were superior? Or Scientology Economics did the equivalent?
Can you imagine if any other group did that? If Catholic Economics came up with a report claiming boards with Catholics were superior? Or Scientology Economics did the equivalent?
Circular reasoning - feminists did research to prove feminism was correct, well, that's such a shocker)
evidence says that men are just plain subhuman. Given leadership of a company, they drive the performance down.
Well, clearly, making men do all the horrible tasks - that currently result in their deathrate at ten times what women experience - is good and just. In fact, it might well be argued that genocide would be a kindness - how else can you deal with these inherently inferior cockroaches?
Feminists hate men.
Feminists hate men, and part of that expression is to lie to their faces about it, but to do that hate every day, in every way that they can.
Feminists imagine a world where the top jobs are filled by them, and them alone, while men fill the graves, men scrape the sewers and fry up power poles, men bow and scrape before them fearful of accusations of "microaggressions" like man-breathing.
And the ABC? Does it represent the people? Of course not. It represents Feminists. Every day, it will present their PoV as truth. It's a propaganda outlet for a hate movement. It takes the money of men, claims to exist to serve men - then undermines them at every opportunity.
Saturday, 12 December 2015
The ABC bias is ever more blatant
When I say the ABC is biased, people are usually confused by what type of bias I refer to. They think of it as left-wing perhaps (which it is by staffing, overwhelmingly) although I actually see it as somewhat fairer than you'd expect in that matter.
A survey of over 600 Australian journalists, conducted by a senior academic from the University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, has cast a revealing light on the political beliefs of Australian journalists.
It shows that over 40 per cent of ABC journalists support the Greens, over 30 per cent support Labor, and just 15 per cent support the Coalition.
Liberal and National voices are, despite this, occasionally heard on their programs, and there is criticism of Labor governments when they are in power. In that left-right political axis, they do make some effort at fairness, at least.
However, examine http://www.abc.net.au/news/topic/feminism
Compare the topic of "antifeminist". Doesn't exist according to the ABC? Yet at least antifeminism gets some representation from other news sources.
Women Against Feminism - I Don’t Need Feminism To Perpetuate The Myth http://t.co/tyCb3aPLqp #WomenAgainstFeminism pic.twitter.com/3ne3CWRrZf— WomenAgainstFemimism (@womenagainstfem) July 31, 2014Now, imagine if their stories had that many topics which were pro-Labor, for example. And none that were pro-Liberal.Yet most people aren't Feminists. The ABC, supposedly "Australia's most trusted source of local, national and world news", only represents a minority PoV. It doesn't acknowledge any other perspective, except occasionally with quotes from their ideological enemies, demonising the alternatives.
It's like if it only reflect the viewpoints of Muslims, and if anyone disagreed with that, and asked for other voices to be heard, they responded with "but why do you hate Arabs? You must hate Arabs, if you aren't pro-Islamic!"
It's a manipulative tactic, a deflection, but one that has served them well.
Here's a typical example of an ABC story.
"The resource has ruffled some feathers before even being released publicly, with criticisms from men's rights groups..."
So do they interview any of those groups? Or even quote the criticisms? Open the market place of ideas?
Heavens, no! They will only ever interview Feminists on why opposition to them is wrong, naturally!
Heavens, no! They will only ever interview Feminists on why opposition to them is wrong, naturally!
Can you imagine if they were to do this with the Liberals and Labor members? If every time Liberals spoke up against Labor policies, the ABC would interview someone from Labor, who would inevitably dismiss their opponents as reactionaries and lunatics, instead of ever printing the Liberal Party PoV?
p.s. there was a very good video on the erasure of men in the media - for example, reporting one hundred sailors drowned, instead of one hundred men drowned - even though all the sailors were men - which is followed by the emphasis on the victimisation of women.
Boko Haram slaughtered tens of thousands of school boys, for example - and the ABC etc never even reported it. They became frantic when a few hundred school girls were kidnapped, however.
The video was there for years, but Feminists complained about it constantly, and Youtube crumbled. And so that antifeminist voice was silenced.
Most people aren't Feminists. They do not believe there is some global conspiracy by men against women. But they are isolated - they never hear from others like themselves. They are manipulated, and their sources of information are controlled.
We, men and women, want to protect women - and we are constantly told by the media that if we do not support Feminism, then women will be hurt.
The Feminist always says: "if you don't love Feminism, the bunny will get it, and it will be your fault."
Don't let them twist you.
Don't let them get away with their lies.
Friday, 4 December 2015
Clementine Ford, the ABC's favourite Damsel in Distress?
Does the ABC love professional victims?
Does it adore the manipulative ploy of the fainting couch?
"A group of women are tackling online abuse by naming and shaming "trolls" in a twitter campaign.... Earlier this week, a man lost his job after he wrote a sexually explicit post on writer and prominent feminist Clementine Ford's Facebook wall." (source)
Who is she? Someone who loves vile language:
"Sydney author and columnist, Kerri Sackville, is leading the charge against the trolling[sic] and says she is sick of seeing women maliciously threatened online."
 |
| From http://antifeminismaustralia.com/news/clementine-ford-man-bashing-quotes/ |
http://www.fighting4fair.com/uncategorized/fireclementineford-a-case-study-in-feminist-hypocrisy/
https://archive.is/ZCkwI
"Hey #Sunrise get f***ed" was written across her chest. https://archive.is/MiUPS#selection-2357.4-2357.31
No mention of that in the ABC, of course. Feminists can do no wrong.
She's painted as a damsel in distress. Oh woe! Where is her fainting couch? Someone has called her a rude word - a word she calls other people all the time.
She is a fanatical feminist - and feminists hold that that word is positive, that slutty behaviour is a good thing, that home wrecking should be celebrated (c.f. Laci Green).
So let's summarise - she has no problem calling other women sluts, she belongs to a movement that claims being a total slut is fantastic, she allies herself with people who boast about destroying homes, she publicly uses offensive language at Sunrise with impunity - and she is your hero, ABC?
I remember when you had a reputation for objectivity, for not being politically partisan. How far you have fallen.
Oh, one last thing - a troll is someone who just wants to stir up the ants and see them run about.
You have no evidence these people are insincere - all you know is that they express opinions feminists don't like.
I remember when you had a reputation for objectivity, for not being politically partisan. How far you have fallen.
Oh, one last thing - a troll is someone who just wants to stir up the ants and see them run about.
You have no evidence these people are insincere - all you know is that they express opinions feminists don't like.
troll
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument
https://archive.is/GfwEN
by Alien EntitySeptember 22, 2002
Update: March 3rd, 2016
Guess she doesn't like it when you call her out!
Tuesday, 3 November 2015
"He beats me. I'm scared", says the ABC, of the terrible man-beasts roaming the country!
Nov 2015 10:58:04 UTC
"There’s no safehouse or women's refuge in Charleville"
Is there a safehouse or men's refuge in the whole of Australia?
"Peggy Sue represents the good and the bad in relationships"
No, it represents feminist propaganda: c.f. The Duluth Model of Misandry
Real DV is often reciprocal, and when it isn't, it's female initiated. http://pb.rcpsych.org/content/35/1/33.1
And it's interesting that the ABC will always ignore that fact.
"It's always the women that have to flee from their household"
An opinion stated as fact. How unusual.
WHERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE.
" if harsher penalties were imposed on offenders who breached domestic violence orders, women could feel safe to stay in their communities"
Because all women are heterosexual, of course, and no men are gay.
http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2014/09/domestic-violence-likely-more-frequent-for-same-sex-couples.html
Woops! DV is higher in non-het relationships. Maybe women can do bad things too? Is that possible, ABC? Is that idea just blowing your mind?
Wife kills husband with hammer, waits 2 weeks to call 911
Here's a scenario. Woman cheats on husband. Husband finds out, wants divorce. She'll get half - but she wants sole custody.
All she has to do is call a DV helpline.
"He beats me. I'm scared".
No evidence is required. He's presumed guilty. He's locked out, homeless, lost access to his own kids. He'll lose the court case. His life is over.
And then maybe he'll go nuts and kill the judge or his wife or himself - and then that will be used as evidence that all men are wicked and all women victims, and that more and more and more help is needed for these damsels in distress.
Yet whenever someone points out that if men are truly so terrible - WHY DON'T WOMEN LEAVE? - they will be shouted down as misogynists.
Think about it. In no other situation do oppressed people voluntarily stay with oppressors. "A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" is the fundamental principle of Feminism - something taught as fact to children in schools now.
So all these man-haters can leave. They don't need men, they claim? Prove it.
Maybe we can put them all in Tasmania, seal it off so they don't have to see any of us horrible rape-monsters, and they can live - and die - in their Femtopia.
And the rest of us can get on with the business of running a civilisation.
Sunday, 21 June 2015
"Females with heart disease are dying in hospital at higher rates than men"?
https://archive.is/qD0Zo saved from http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2015/s4258793.htm 22 Jun 2015 03:11:35 UTC
"Females with heart disease are dying in hospital at higher rates than men"
Who cares if they are dying in or out of the hospital? What are the figures for men and women DYING OF HEART DISEASE?
"every hour of every day an Australian woman dies of heart disease."
How awful. How many men? More? Less?
Cherry-picking, how does that work again?
"The Heart Foundation thinks there's a dangerous perception that heart attacks mostly affect men."
Which they will now refute with facts... no? No facts today? Tomorrow maybe?
"Julie-Anne Mitchell is the health director of the Heart Foundation."
Well, I'm sure she will treat men and women equally - and not be completely sexist. I mean, that would be terrible if something supported by the government were only interested in the needs of people based on their sex, right?
That would be, by definition, sexual discrimination. There's no chance of the government paying our taxes to sexist bastards, now, is there?
" three times as many women will die of heart disease as they will of breast cancer."
They are really focussed on whether or not you are dying IN HOSPITAL - surely it's the DYING part which is the problem?
"The Heart Foundation says 21 per cent of Australian women are dying in hospital of heart disease, compared to 14 per cent of men."
Nope, they really are obsessed. If you are dying as a homeless man, unable to get a hospital bed, well, stuff you, we have to worry about these women in their nice hospital beds! We can't spare the love for you, mate!
"There are a range of reasons as to why women are not doing as well when it comes to heart disease as men. "
Are there? Yet so far, all that's been talked about is hospital deaths, not overall mortality rates.
https://archive.is/j65jY saved from http://www.aihw.gov.au/deaths/leading-causes-of-death/#leading-sex 22 Jun 2015 03:08:03 UTC
Gosh. When we look at real figures, suddenly it's men dying, not women. Huh.
"But doctors aren't exactly sure why the cardiovascular surgery rates for women are lower."
Maybe because they aren't in need of it as much? Because more men are dying of it? Despite there being fewer men overall?
"BRIDGET BRENNAN: If they do survive in hospital, women are more likely to go on to have a second heart attack."
Yes, compared to the men who just have their funeral to look forward to.
"We do find that women's outcomes after being discharged from hospital are not as great as men"
As someone who is far more likely to be dead as an outcome as a result of my gender I am not quite sure how they come to that conclusion. A fate worse than death? Daytime television, perhaps?
" I do believe that women have most of it. "
Most of what? The ABC's support? The public tax expenditure? Endless amounts of gynocentric propaganda from the ABC - how incredibly shocking.
It's is a nice bit of irony to see "ABC Fact Check" right next to this article - when they haven't done any.
Remember folks! Feminism is Equality(TM), but some are more equal than others...
Saturday, 30 May 2015
Suddenly, the Sydney Morning Herald notices DV isn't always straight.
https://archive.is/5VqrJ
Saved from http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/domestic-violence-a-silent-epidemic-in-gay-relationships-20150530-1mm4hg
30 May 2015 10:32:40 UTC
MRAs have been saying this for years. WA is notorious for it's helplines, for example: I don't know if it still does, but it had two: one for women and one for men.
Saved from http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/domestic-violence-a-silent-epidemic-in-gay-relationships-20150530-1mm4hg
30 May 2015 10:32:40 UTC
MRAs have been saying this for years. WA is notorious for it's helplines, for example: I don't know if it still does, but it had two: one for women and one for men.
The one for women was to get help for being a victim from a man.
The one for men was to confess abusing a woman.
I made complaints etc - never heard anything about it.
And whenever the ABC says anything about DV, it shows that same model - based on radical feminism - called the Duluth Model - which holds that all DV (and really, everything bad) is caused by masculinity.
Whenever they want to talk about DV, they'll interview an 'expert' -self-appointed, of course - who will explain that it's all because boys read comic books and play video games instead of studying feminism and learning to hate themselves.
The government will occasionally pipe up to cry crocodile tears at the plight of DV victims (meaning women).
In fact, one of the best moments in recent history was when the NSW police force showed a picture of a DV victim - a man - and feminists went mental and demanded it be taken down. There were thousands of pictures of women and one of a man - but that was too much.
https://archive.is/nka54
Saved from http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/male-victims-of-domestic-violence-police-facebook-post-stirs-debate-on-controversial-issue/story-fni0cx12-1227189639460
30 May 2015 10:47:11 UTC
https://archive.is/nka54
Saved from http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/male-victims-of-domestic-violence-police-facebook-post-stirs-debate-on-controversial-issue/story-fni0cx12-1227189639460
30 May 2015 10:47:11 UTC
For feminism to work, male victims must be invisible. They must be erased.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)