Caitlin Stasey is a lying, hypocritical slut - and this is the face of Feminism?

Caitlin Stasey

This women is promoting her soft porn site as being 'empowering', and it is praised as 'courageous' by other feminists.

You know what courage is?

You know what isn't brave? Taking your clothes off. Worse, calling it brave degrades all the achievements of the genuine heroes.

http://herself.com/caitlin/

"I know it troubles many people for me to refer to myself as a lesbian considering I have a male partner."

Yes. Because that is not what a lesbian is. Bisexuality IS a thing.

"it was just understood that I was born cisgendered"

It is just understood because it is the most likely result. Transgendered people are rare. Assuming someone isn't until proven otherwise is a rational response.

"No one anywhere ever should EVER be able to tell a woman what is right for her body regarding her reproductive rights."

Equally, no man should ever be forced to labour for a woman's reproduction - if she wants a child without his consent, why must he pay for her happiness? That is not justice, and an egalitarian movement would never support that inequity.

"Contraceptives should be free"

Why just contraceptives? Toilet paper is important, as is water, food, shelter, clothing... heck, why not just say everything should be free.

BECAUSE REALITY DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.

Somebody has to pay for it. when you demand something be free, all you are doing is transferring the costs to someone else. You are saying "I want it - but I don't want to work for it".

Any economy founded on those principles ends up turning into a state where someone with a gun is pointing it at a worker, telling them to labour so someone else gets stuff for free.

"Women are fucking durable & powerful."

Yet can fall apart if someone wears a shirt with pictures of women on it, or calls them 'bossy'. That's not strong. That's not durable. That is WEAK.

And that's what Feminism teaches women to be - ultra-fragile, always ready to take offense, shrieking like the Princess and the Pea over the least inconvenience.

"What are your feelings on monogamy?

It’s so pointless, painful & archaic."

I often point out that Feminism wants the destruction of marriage. Feminists tell me it's a myth; i then point to quotes by feminists saying otherwise; they respond by telling me they aren't TRUE feminists.

Well, is she not a TRUE feminist? Because that's hilarious!

"Do women treat you differently than men?

Women are more empathic, considered, honest & tactile. The more I experience the men the more I’m experiencing their bias & privilege."

Right. She's a man-hater. Tell me again that feminists don't hate men. Tell me again that feminist don't see women as superior to men.

"the constant pursuit of women by strange men"

Maybe the word 'constant' is confusing to her? Because when real women are filmed on the street - they do not have men following them all the time, or even most of the time, and, oddly enough - it was MEN that made that behaviour ILLEGAL.

"How do you define feminism?

As a group of people pushing forward to total & inarguable equality."

LIAR! You just said that women were better.

"ANIMAL FARM" WAS NOT A GUIDE AS TO HOW TO BEHAVE.

"If being a woman, by today’s standards, benefits you then you aren’t benefiting."

That's gibberish. If something is benefiting you - YOU ARE BENEFITED.

Was she high during this? Or had some section of her brain been removed by her hate-cult during indoctrination?

"my kindness & flirtation were grounds to expect sex from me"

Well, it's certainly not kind to give off mixed signals, it's manipulative, it's called being a bitch, and I've seen women who do that to other women too - and those women are hated just as much.

It's a shitty thing to do to people. Caitlin Stasey is a horrible, amoral, self-entitled bitch, and I genuinely hope she realises it one day.

"How do you feel about the media’s portrayal of women?

It depicts us as sexless unless corrupt"

Uh huh. so we'll just ignore all the naughty but nice girls throughout the history of cinema now, shall we?

" hairless unless masculine "

Yes, men are hairy compared to women, and so it's hardly surprising that men sexually select for women with less body hair. women with excess body hair usually have hormonal problems, causing difficulties with fertility.

BIOLOGY IS NOT OPPRESSING YOU.

" helpless unless evil"

There's been kick-ass women in media since the invention of film. This woman is a professional victim. She does not want to see anything positive in the world when it's done by men, she hates us that much she's willing to erase all the heroines of media history.

" We’re not allowed to be gross "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roseanne

"intelligent"

If you look at couples, the man is usually portrayed as stupid and the woman much more intelligent. See "Family Guy", "The Simpsons", http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WomenAreWiser

"How do you think the world at large views women?

As mothers, sluts, virgins, or wives."

And yet it keeps putting them in charge of nations, gives them sniper rifles and tanks, awards them Nobel Prizes, sends them into space...

Oh wait. Maybe she's from some alternate dimension. Because, ON THIS PLANET, it's nothing like that.

"Have you ever experienced sexism or sexual harassment within a workplace?

...A woman once called me a slut, I assume as a joke, and I’d never even once spoken to her."

THAT IS NEITHER HARASSMENT NOR IS IT SEXISM. It is an expression of a negative opinion. She thinks you sleep around. WHICH YOU DO. YOU SAID THAT YOU DID THAT. DO YOU NOT HEAR YOURSELF.

"How have you dealt with conflict?

By flipping out & raging."

Yep, that does not surprise me in the least. Her sort love to lash out and then blame the nearest man for their violence. I pity that poor boy in her life. http://www.helpguide.org/articles/abuse/help-for-abused-men.htm

"Have you ever been verbally abused or threatened because of your gender?

I’m sure I’m only cat called because I’m a woman

Since feminists classify 'hello' as cat calling (not kidding, see the video where a model walks the streets, it's counted as harassment when someone wishes her a good day), then yes, I'm sure her life is one endless round of weeping.

So what happens when a man of equivalent attractiveness does the same thing?

Oh.

The same thing happens.

It's almost like this had nothing to do with gender and everything to do with the fact that attractive individuals get a lot of attention. Gosh. But she only cares when it happens to woemn - because she really does love equality, don't you believe her?

" and verbally thrashed online because I’m a woman"

No, it's because you are a hypocrite, a liar and, as you pointed out, a slut.

You are also a proud prick-tease. I don't know if you beat your partner too, but frankly, it wouldn't surprise me.

" I once had a man stalk me for over a year"

I'm so sorry for him. What if he had caught up to you?

Women stalk men - and other women. Again, it's not a gender issue.

"What are you feelings on motherhood?

On one hand it’s overrated I’m sure & expected of us and on the other I’m sure it’s magical. I don’t believe a nuclear family is conducive to wholesomeness or fullness so motherhood as a concept is changing. A mother and father can be combined in one individual & I think gendered parenting is on the out."

What's that, Feminists? Feminism ISN'T AGAINST THE FAMILY? That's a myth spread by it's enemies?

She's against the family. Are you saying... she's not a TRUE feminist?

"Women – Love each other, support each other, defend each other."

But not men, of course - they are the 'other'. A lot of hate groups work that way. they are very loving to the in-group - and place the responsibility for all evil at the feet of those outside.

May her life be short and unpleasant, and on her passing, may it's bile and spite be soon forgotten.

What do real feminists do?

blackjackgabbiani said: I have actual, real-world experience as a feminist, doing real political work, and the way you claim that it's ignorance to say that the anti-equality people aren't feminists is garbage. They AREN'T feminists because they don't work for equality. They don't meet the one single definition required for it. Egalitarianism is a whole made of parts, and feminism is in fact one of those parts. Claiming that people don't know what they're talking about just because they disagree with you is crappy.

draumbouy-deactivated20150111:

WHAT AN ADORABLE LITTLE ANECDOTE.

now lets all snap back to reality here and look at FACTS.

let’s look at what real feminism has done in the real world.

Now, theres no question that feminists did some great things for womens rights. but they’ve also done a whole lot of bad for both genders as well, especially in recent years.

many of the first feminists where white supremacists.

feminist have campaigned and fought against equality for both genders on many occasions

many feminist leaders were borderline genercidal. In fact Valerie Solanas, who helped to shape modern patriarchy theory, and who’s writing is still taught today in womens studies classes, not only attempted to assassinate Andy Warhol, but also wrote a book called the S.C.U.M. Manifesto (or feminist Mein Kompf), which was about gendercide, and she is still hailed as a feminist hero to this day. this book is still used in womens studies classes despite the fact that it proposes reducing the male population to 10% and using them for breeding purposes.

Now i know what you’re gonna say, NOT ALL FEMINISTS.

Feminism is a political movement. It has leaders. The rest of the people who join it, like the bloggers on tumblr, inherently support them by supporting feminism. Its not a big enough party to have multiple sects. Political parties motives are determined not by the supporters, but by the people who lead them, the people who do fundraisers, and organize protests, and slutwalks. The people who create the propaganda. The ones who write the literature, and who teach the women’s studies courses and plan their curriculums. Those people are far more influential than a sixteen year old with a blog and a few hundred followers.

The thing is, even your definition of feminism is wrong. The name itself should tell you that this is a gendered movement. Im assuming you’re going by the Websters definition.

Now im gonna do a breakdown on why even by its very definition feminism isnt for equality.

fem·i·nism

'fem??niz?m/

noun

1. the advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.

   That link will take you to the ACTUAL definition of Feminism. now Websters did in fact say sexes but its secondary definition said

     “organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests" which even by Websters is still in favor of women. The oxford english dictionary also says that feminism is indeed about women.

   You are probably asking yourself why this is even a problem. Aren’t women the ones who still need rights? Well see that may have been true twenty years ago but now it really isn’t. The main problem with the definition of feminism is that it enforces this idea that men live in some ideal world that women should want to live in. Idealizes our situation has the negative effect of erasing our problems. So even by its very definition feminism is already fucking up the idea of equal treatment and consideration.

men actually have less rights than women. men are also demonized as rapists due to unequal rape laws that favor women. when you analyze the situation you’ll find that women rape almost as often as men (about 40% of rapists are women) and men are raped just as often if not more than women.

Men want protection against false rape allegations. They feel that a man’s life should not be ruined simply on the allegation of a woman who may be a vindictive liar. Currently, a woman can accuse a man of rape for no reason, and the man’s name is splashed in the paper and his life is ruined. So, they fought for laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.

Feminists fought against this, causing it to fail. Also see here, the London Feminist Network campaigning to defeat the proposal.

Men want an end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.

Feminists fought against this, arguing that no woman should be sent to jail, even women who had murdered multiple people.

Men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.

Feminists fought against this by trying to suppress evidence showing that half of domestic violence is done by women, by threatening the researchers with bomb threats, death threats, etc. Modern, younger feminists are doing it as well.

The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting primarily in having only male batterers criminally pursued.

Men want female rapists to be arrested, charged, and convicted with rape. In Western countries, women are rarely punished when raping men, due to the biased legal system. In some countries, women cannot be punished when raping men, since rape is defined as a male-perpetrated crime.

Feminists fought against this in India, arguing that “there is a physicality [in] rape” and that it would make things “more complicated for judges.”

Feminists fought against this in Israel, claiming that changing the law would result in men filing false rape claims.

Men don’t want to be thrown in jail because they lost their jobs and temporarily cannot pay child support.

Feminists fought against this, trying to lower the amount to $5000 before a man is guilty of a felony for not paying child support. If a man loses a decent-paying job, he will now be a felon, go to jail, lose his right to vote, AND be unable to find future jobs—if he cannot regain an equal-paying job within a few months.

Men want equal economic support and help from the government. When the recession hit, male-dominated fields like construction lost millions of jobs, while female-fields like education and healthcare gained jobs. So the government proposed an economic stimulus for those fields.

Feminists successfully fought against this, arguing that it was discrimination to support men, and caused the government to give money to women who didn’t deserve it. Hundreds of professional feminists complained against the “sexism” of helping men (who had lost jobs) and not women (who had gained jobs).

A representative of the Michigan National Organization for Women testified in opposition to the Revocation of Paternity Act, which stopped the old law which stated that if a woman was married and cheated on her husband, the resulting child is considered to be legally the husband’s and the biological father had no legal rights to fight for custody or parenting time with his biological child.

In 2008, a law was passed in England and Wales that allowed long-term domestic violence victims who killed their abuser to be charged with the lesser charge of manslaughter, but this only applies to women.

In California and Montana, a woman can name any man she likes as the father, he gets a letter in the mail, if he does not prove he isn’t the father within 30 days he is now the father and must pay. He cannot contest it. And DNA tests to prove paternity are not considered proof by the courts.

Women who falsely accuse a man of rape, who would be sent to prison for 10+ years if convicted, only gets fined or a slap on the wrist.

There is also the gender bias in the Probation Departments:

A higher score on the Probation Assessment Tool (PAT) means a recommendation that could lead to eventual dismissal of charges. A lower score means probation or lockup, not to mention the juvenile delinquent tag. [Judge] Hunt claims PAT routinely rewards girls with 14 extra points for gender alone, while boys get 0. 

Then there are studies that show women who fail to pay child support are incarcerated only 1/8th as often as men with similar violations.

The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting in having mostly male batterers criminally pursued, and female batterers left alone.

Men who are falsely accused of rape can have their names published and their lives ruined even if they are not convicted or charged - their accuser is protected and is likely to face no punishment, or a light one.

• Feminists skewed the Definition of Domestic Abuse, resulting in only male abusers being arrested and female abusers not.
• Feminists’s DV training hurts Police training
• Feminist Mary Koss denies male rape victims.
• Feminists violently protesting against Warren Farrell at U of Toronto
• A mob of feminists at a recent protest attacking and sexually molesting a group of Rosary-praying Catholic men who were peacefully protecting the cathedral in the city of San Juan from threats of vandalism.
• Feminists disrupt a forum for battered men
• Feminists fought a law for equal custody to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit. Multiple times.
• Feminists started a campaign against Father’s rights groups
• Feminists fought against laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.
• Feminists fought against a law to end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.
• Feminist fought against men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.
• Feminists in India and Israel fought against female rapists being arrested, charged and convicted of rape.
• Feminists fought against a economic stimulus for male-dominated job such as construction, etc.
  
• Feminist fought a law against  Paternity Fraud.
• Feminist Harriet Harman has publicly requested employers to hire women in preference to White men if both job candidates are equally
• Equality Minister,feminist Patricia Hewitt, was found guilty of breaching the Sex Discrimination Act by “overlooking a strong male candidate for a job in favour of a weaker female applicant”.
• Elected in 2009, the lesbian feminist prime minister Johanna Sigurdardottir has vowed to “end of the Age of Testosterone
• Feminists want to peeing while standing illegal
• Erin Pizzey had to flee the UK because she and her family received death threats and her dog murdered all because feminists didn’t like that she discovered women were equally as violent as men.
• Also Suzanne Steinmetz and her children received death threats and bomb threats she discovered that  the rate at which men were victimized by domestic violence was similar to the rate for women.
• Richard Gelles and Murray Straus  have all received death threats from feminists, simply for publishing their findings (that female-to-male family violence was equal to the rate of male-to-female violence).
• Feminists say Men can’t be raped. 
  
  
• Feminists defend female raping minor.
• Feminist defends why fucking an 8 year old boy isn’t rape.
• Most feminists backed studies are bullshit.
• Beyond reasonable doubt doesn’t apply to rape.For men only
• Feminist changes mind on rape culture when her son is falsely accused.
• Feminists primary aggressor clause discriminates against males.
• Feminists cover up female domestic abuse stats.
• Jezebel mocks men who are abused.
• Feminists make sure the gov doesn’t spend money on male shelters or male research.
• Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide.
• Feminists stage mock murders to scare men. 
• Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism.
• Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands.
• Propaganda campaign against male fathers wanting custody.
• Feminists wish to slander accused names before convicted. 
• Try to shut down female prisons.
• Create rape laws that exclude female rapists.
• Make it impossible to charge women with rape.
• Feminists against equal custody.
• Female felons should serve home sentences.
• Told judges to be lenient on women.
• Feminists cover up female domestic violence.
• Feminists don’t want the gov to help unemployed men.
• Feminists launch campaigns to help girls only while boys are doing worse in every facet of education.
• Males who were raped as a child still have to pay child support.
• Women should have the right to put a child up for adoption before the father gets custody.
• Feminists against beyond reasonable doubt when it’s male rapists.
• 5 rights feminism ignores for men.
• Feminists blame males for their abuse.
• The primary aggressor clause where only men get charged with abuse.
• Shame men into going to war.
• Feminists dismiss female child rapists.
• Feminists say men can’t talk about domestic abuse.
• Feminists mock a man who has his dick cut off.
• feminists attack church.
• Feminists shut down a festival about gender equality for including men.
• Feminists hope MRA’s die.
• Feminists against fathers day.
• Feminist makes up fake assault stories. 
• Female reporter bullied by feminists at the National Young Feminist Leadership Conference

And you seriously wonder why women don’t want to be a part of the feminist movement?

Wage Gap Myth links

1. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/
   
2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250672504707048.html
   
3. http://money.howstuffworks.com/gender-gap1.htm
   
4. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-13/don-t-blame-discrimination-for-gender-wage-gap.html
   
5. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/davidgreen/9666597/The_gender_pay_gap_does_not_exist/
6. http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf
   
7. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/
   
8. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-gender-wage-gap-is-a-myth-2012-07-26
   
9. http://www.businessinsider.com/actually-the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-a-myth-2011-3?op=1
   
10. http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/41131660349/the-so-called-pay-gap
    
11. http://tgjesusfreak.tumblr.com/post/59991585178
    
12. http://wwww.examiner.com/x-22884-Canada-Politics-Examiner~y2010m2d22-Gender-pay-gap-is-not-what-activists-claim
13. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/vickiwoods/7957186/Sorry-ladies-Im-not-worried-about-wage-gaps.html
14. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/opinion/22Sommers.html?_r=1&hp
15. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/09/the_wage_gap_myth.html
16. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa3pKN3XUKM&feature=youtu.be
17. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/economy/06women.html?_r=2
18. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/biggest-shock-fridays-payroll-report-sorry-men
19. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/07/share-of-men-in-labor-force-at-all-time-low/?src=recg
20. http://www.businessinsider.com/women-in-tech-make-more-money-and-land-better-jobs-than-men-20
21. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedType=R
22. http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=10630664
23. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
24. http://www.ksee24.com/news/local/Young-Women-Earn-More-159818705.html
25. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html
26. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/03/14/jobs-where-women-earn-more-than-men/
27. http://www.womenintechnology.co.uk/news/young-women-earn-more-than-men%E2%80%94news-800761492
28. http://www.womensviewsonnews.org/2011/10/young-women-now-earn-more-than-men-in-uk/
29. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedTy%E2%80%A6
30. http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/03/15/optout.revolution/
31. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23413243
32. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/Careers/06/13/dads.work/index.html
33. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-04-equal-parenting_N.htm
34. http://www.sify.com/news/women-stay-away-from-math-out-of-their-own-free-choice-news-scitech-kk1lubiiiee.html
35. http://www.science20.com/news_articles/women_science_no_discrimination_says_cornell_study-75984
36. http://www.payscale.com/career-news/2009/12/do-men-or-women-choose-majors-to-maximize-income
37. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html

From http://afpe-ask-blog.tumblr.com/post/107959628549/i-agree-that-there-are-bad-feminist-and

Ruby Hamad has no idea what science is, but wants it to apologise immediately.

"How to apologise for sexism: a scientific study"

Dated November 27, 2014 - 8:56AM

Ruby Hamad

Ruby Hamad recently came to my attention for claiming that terrorism is the result of masculinity.

Apparently those muslim women who donate to terrorist causes like IS, and those muslim women who strap explosive belts to themselves, or fill a baby carriage with an IED, are just puppets of the Patriarchy, and can't be held responsible for anything they do, ever.

So it's hardly surprising that her grasp of science is about as good as her grasp of politics.


"given that the criticism was initiated by science writers Rose Eveleth and Ed Yong, I felt that it was both valid and worthwhile."

Wow. Two journalists possessed an opinion you liked. Gosh. Well, it has to be true, then, doesn't it? We'll just ignore all the dissenting views; two journos agreed with you; it's now Truth(TM).

"After all, who is better placed than those within the scientific community to discuss if and how such imagery affects women working in these fields?"

I dunno.

Women scientists maybe?

Who do ACTUAL FUCKING SCIENCE?


Instead feminist journos are her idea of experts - well they are the experts on the topic of HOW EVERY FUCKING THING IS ACTUALLY ABOUT GENDER POLITICS.

Landing a probe on a comet - yes, that is totally oppressing women everywhere. OPPRESHUNNNN!

Dr Matt Taylor, the European Space Agency's project scientist on the Comet 67P mission. [photo: YouTube]

The American Astronomical Society (AAS) released a statement outlining its position on the feminist crapfest that is Shirtgate.


What is Shirtgate?


So let's look at what they said.

unacceptable abuse has been directed toward the critics, from criticism of “over-active feminism”

Whatttt? They say simple criticism of “over-active feminism” is unacceptable abuse?

Islamist militants attacked French satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo with exactly that worldview.

The cartoon features a member of ISIS about to behead Muhammed and calling him an infidel. The caption reads, 'If Muhammad were to return...' In response to criticism, the magazine's editor Charb told the Cairo Post, '(ISIS) has failed to understand the concepts of Islam to a point where they could consider the Muslim prophet an infidel.' (source)

This shows that Feminism now runs the AAS and similar institutes, and will decide what it's members can do or say. Yes, they no longer focus on stuff, like, I dunno, PUTTING FUCKING PROBES ON COMETS, and now on maintaining Feminist conformity.

" Clearly, Hirsi Ali was unaware that to numerous professional science organisations, the issue was anything but trivial."

'Numerous'. It's still a fucking handful. Nevertheless, thanks to cretins like Ruby, I can well imagine Science in the West becoming just another branch of the Feminist propaganda machine. What will happen then?

Well, see, the thing is:


Even if Feminism wins in the West, and fucks it to the core, all it will mean is that those countries which aren't feminist will out-compete those who are. This is already starting thanks to countries which favour pragmatism over ideology; while Feminists are demanding all businesses run by their ideology and not capitalism, 'Communist' china - the most capitalist country on this planet - is growing and growing, while the United States and other western nations fade - just like the British Empire.

Feminism is heroin for countries - it might make them feel good for a while, give them pretty delusions, and fantasies of power - but anyone not using it grows stronger while those who do get sicker.

So China, which Sciences like fuck and doesn't give a damn about whether the results fit Feminist Theory, will be building bases on fucking Mars, while feminists are still screaming about how phallocentric the rockets sent there are.

Susan Dwyer, and why we must learn to stop worrying and love the Sisterhood.

The destruction of the presumption of innocence, a 1500 year old principle, is, in this Feminist's opinion,

"a welcome innovation"

"Despite the criticisms, a “yes means yes” policy is a welcome innovation in tackling sexual misconduct of all kinds"

ALL kinds? Great! So it will stop false rape accusations? Boy. That is one neat trick.

How, exactly, will it manage that?



" it targets the stereotypical attitudes about gender that lead to problematic sexual behavior"

 That women, like men, are able to articulate their opinions? Yes, I can see that would be very problematic, if you view women as frightened children.

 " if the new standard changes the conversation about sexual assault"

 Well, yes, it will now change it to "please do not charge me with sexual assault just out of a whim, which you can now do with impunity"

 "Consent creates a kind of moral magic"

 Strangly enough, law courts disagree with you. In every other arena, if you agree to something, then you agree to it. No magic there, sorry. Maybe... maybe I'm wrong! And Judge Judy is really a witch! Aieeee!

 But, yes, I can see YOU might find the notion of consent incomprehensible.

 "Some critics say that it is unclear what will count as affirmative consent"

 Yes. Because they asked the people enforcing it "what will count as affirmative consent". Still waiting on the answer, btw. Any day now. Any day.

 "the new standard does not require a signed contract between students before sexual activity may occur"

 Is that your legal opinion? Because the lawyers who've examined this say they have no idea how someone can establish consent. If they don't know, how come you do?

 Oh right. Magic. Sorry I asked.


 "After all, it is the rare individual who can specify in advance of a particular sexual episode what actions she consents to. "

 Nice of you to point out it's only females who can't do this, but I'm afraid you need to refine it further. It's feminists who are incapble. The rest of us manage just fine.

 "Could you say beforehand whether you will not consent to having your wrists firmly held above your head during intercourse?"

 Yes. Is that really difficult? Oh right, I'm talking to someone who thinks consent is witchcraft.

 "What it does require is conversation"

 In the middle of sex. To put it bluntly, instead of fucking like animals, you will now have to chatter continuously - and since you cannot prove someoen verbally consented, unless you record the event (which may itself be a crime), then your partner can renege after the event. As has been frequently pointed out, as you no doubt know about and just don't care.

 "sex may not typically be considered a chatty activity, but in truth, it’s only cultural assumptions that make us feel awkward asking our partners whether a certain activity is OK with them."

 Oh right, all those scientists who say otherwise, jeez, what idiots they must be. They should stop doing science and do more gender studies, like you.

 "On reflection, it should strike us as odd that we are supposed to know what our partners want "

 If only there was some sort of communication which was non-verbal... gosh... if only some bright spark could have invented that millions and millions of years ago.

 " One cannot presume, without considerable discussion, what a new partner might or might not enjoy. "

 Which is why I have to aks each partner if they would like to have their nails removed with pliers.

 "in such relationships affirmative consent may not be required in any definitive form"

 Except it's been pointed out no exceptions exist in the legislation, so thank you for giving legal advice WHEN YOU ARE NOT QUALIFIED. YOU TURNIP.

 " one element of consent is always in play: It can be revoked at any time"

 Such as the second before a man ejaculates. Oh dear! He should have held it back! No doubt the next decade he spends behind bars being raped and beaten will teach him better control.

 "Although the change in policy is positive"

 in your opinion, which you are stating as fact.

 "Its adoption will not eliminate sexual assault on campus. "

 Finally got something right!


 "specialized victim support"

 For everyone? Or just women? It's just women, isn't it?

 "confidentiality and reporting protocols."

 Because the ability to face your accuser is so passe! If Jane Demoray wants to destroy Brent Smith, why, she can just say he done the deed, and be Believed. That's what your propaganda says we should do with 'survivors'. "Believe". Don't think!! Believe.

 " its adoption will, over time, change the perspective from which students and administrators view sexual misconduct"

 Yes. Student males will know that any sexual contact with a female can arbitrarily result in their destruction. Administrators will know that 1500 years of legal principle has been erased. Without any ballot on the matter, no referendum...Innocent Until Proven Guilty? Just. Gone.

 " only a morally repulsive assumption about women’s psychology would lead us to think that the policy increases the mendacity of those who report sexual assault."

 Ah. Ad hominem. How refreshing. It's been minutes since of your mob launched one at me. Did you want to tell me I have a stinky bottom too?


 " The change shifts the burden of proof from the accuser, who had to show that she resisted, to the accused, who must now show that he sought and received her consent"

 As I said. No more presumption of innocence. And no legal way is outlined to prove innocence. If accused, guilty. I'm surprised you bother with trials. Will you televise them? Will you make them confess, weeping, of their crimes against The Party?


 "The sexual abuse of women has a long and complex history"

 Oh, and here I was thinking feminism was about equality. EGALITARIANS WOULD HAVE SAID IT WAS EVERYONE'S SEXUAL ABUSE THAT MATTERED.

 " arguably, the causes of sexual assault on campus and the situations in which it occurs differ from those in wider society"

 I can argue the moon is a giant turnip, it doesn't make it true. YOU HAVE ADVANCED NO EVIDENCE. YOU MERELY WEASEL-WORD YOUR WAY THROUGH LIFE.

 "Susan Dwyer is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Maryland."

 I weep for the University of Maryland.

 "she specializes in areas at the intersection of moral philosophy"

 Yet seems devoid of any herself.


" constitutional law"

What? i don't see a law degree here. http://www.philosophy.umd.edu/people/dwyer#tabs-1

Was it bought over the internet? Hope you kept the receipt!

" feminist theory"

didn't see that coming. Really, what more do you need to say?

'manspreading'?