Feminists demand all sex be controlled by the State.

Feminists demand all sex be a crime for men unless they request permission from the State beforehand.

It will be licensed and regulated by Feminists in strictest adherence to the teachings of Dworkin et al.

http://www.dagensarena.se/opinion/infor-korkort-for-att-fa-ligga/


A driving license for lying [together as in having sex] should be of exactly the same reason that people with firearms license lock their weapons so the children do not access them.


"It’s as if George Orwell’s Junior Anti-sex League has occupied feminism."

---

Translation below

"Faced with a license to lie«
Published April 20, 2016 by Debate - 26 comments



Harassment, insults, threats, and in the worst cases, rape is a part of many girls' and women's lives. Something must be done - start with sex education, writes Klara Larsson, Laboremus and SSU Uppland.

Have you ever felt a hand on your butt when you have not asked for it? Have a sense of self-loathing washed over you after someone touched you in an intimate context? How fun is sex to you anyway? Does it worth? Do you do it because you want to and think it's nice or to the press and other factors confirmation weighs over?

All too often , the answers are hesitant on these issues among young people. Then research on human sexuality started really in the middle of the 1900s, it has begun revealed to us the delusions we have. The impact has been in the awareness of these started appearing.

On Girl Support Association 's website you can read that every third girl who visits a youth has been subjected to repeated insults and threats. Furthermore, 14 percent in the past year have been exposed to some type of sexual abuse. We should pay attention to this iceberg and begin to digest it as soon as possible. A »license« to lie is a reasonable solution.

Many of the boys who have gone too close or too far sexually with a young girl, often do not know about it. Sometimes do not even know the girl about it, something just feels wrong. Of all sexual assaults in 2013, 98 percent had been committed by men, according to statistics from the National Crime Prevention Council. Demonization of rapists makes the plot feels so far away from reality.

But the fact is that a rapist can actually be anyone - it is usually anyone. Most rapes are committed indoors by an acquaintance of the victim. So high rape statistics Sweden , according Girl's Shelter, in fact, makes it inconceivable that a few are going around the country and mass rapes 365 days all his years as sexually active.

What this shows? Well, that something must be done. The necessary ontet must become a part of every individual's daily life. I'm talking about sex education. As hard as it sounds it is, we have to sit and blush and talk about penises and snippor. The Public Health Agency (then National Public Health Institute) in its report Sex, health and wellness, from 2012 to sexual well-being, according to the World Health Organization , is part of the definition of a good health.

Sexual wellbeing is thus an important factor in our lives, in all cases, something that has a major impact on how we perceive our everyday lives. Therefore, we will talk about all the glands woman has in her abdomen so we understand how wet it must be for it not to be equated with a limp dick.

Have you for example heard of the prostate glands like the vulvans urethra? Without a proper sex education one turns to porn when you want to know how sex should be.

And yes, we should have the full examination on this, with the ability to get everything from A to F in the ratings. Without approval, you may not have sex. I could just as well have been able to propose an increase in the wealth tax or any other so-called "mad controlling«. But so far, I will not go, instead I suggest a solution to reduce the number of fractured (mostly girls) anus.

A driving license for lying [as in sex] should be of exactly the same reason that people with firearms license lock their weapons so the children do not access them.

Will their freedom to bear arms may be limited, then their freedom to go bananas with their sexual incompetence be. There is a risk of at least as much damage. It bleeds just do not, necessarily.

Klara Larsson , Laboremus and SSU Uppland district board

Why does Feminism hate humour?

Monty Python’s John Cleese Worries That Political Correctness Will Lead Us into a Humorless World, Reminiscent of Orwell’s 1984

And how does SocJus respond?

Text:

Francisco Gonzalez

"What members of the dominant class and culture call "political correctness" are simply demands for respect and common decency towards the less powerful. Humor only works between peers: otherwise is simply an exercise in dominance"

Screenshot:

Click to view full size

By William Merritt Chase - The Athenaeum:
Home - info - pic,
Public Domain,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2060164

"What members of the dominant class"


Class conflict? Oh! You are a Marxist. I'm terribly sorry for you.


So you think that you have two groups - the oppressed and the oppressors - and the oppressed ... can still manage to destroy their oppressors on a whim?


What sort of doublethink does it take to manage to feel oppressed by the class of people who exist at your whim? Who have no such power over you?



" demands for respect"


No. Respect is not your birth-right, you have to earn it. We are civil to each other, but we do not have to respect each other.


Saying that someone deserves respect simply because they are born is absurd, and is, I have noticed, almost always a one way transaction.


Example:


"boys must be taught to respect girls"


There is always a silence. The missing reciprocation, once remarked on, usually gets the deflection:


"why do you hate all women?"



" Humor only works between peers"

Prince Charles is 'most amused' at birthday evening of comedy

Garbage.


Royal families have had comedians entertain them for centuries - and yes, that does include a fair amount of teasing.

Only in totalitarian states does your rule apply, which is why it must be inviting to you - you want to sit in Stalin's chair, deciding who is allowed to laugh.

"in the Soviet Union telling political jokes could be regarded as type of extreme sport: according to Article 58 (RSFSR Penal Code), "anti-Soviet propaganda" was a potentially capital offense." (source)

Paizo Plows on!

Continued from http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2015/09/paizo-will-decide-what-you-may-play.html



“it's not 'censorship', the government isn't forcing people not to produce the game”

The idea that censorship only counts if it’s from the State is one often used by authoritarians to justify their actions. If a group burns your books, the books are burnt, regardless of whether the State sanctions it. That might be a Torah, a Bible, a copy of '1984'...

It’s all about silencing voices you don’t like - directly, by removing the offending texts; indirectly, by intimidating authors.

If the mob in Russia tells a journalist not to print an article, do you really think what a government sanctioned censor says matters a damn?

"..and even if they did it could very well still be legal”

If it was illegal, it would be acted on - so i have to wonder why you would even think, for a microsecond, that I was arguing it was illegal?


“ given that hate-speech and the like isn't protected under any law”

Hatespeech. How Orwellian that concept is. Certain words must be banned from being spoken. Certain thoughts may not be expressed.

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

   The Universal Declaration of Human Rights          

PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and  inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation  of freedom, justice and peace in the world, 

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in  barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind,

and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech   and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the   highest aspiration of the common people, 



Nothing there saying “it totally doesn’t count when non-State actors take away those rights”.



jessicalprice
https://archive.is/oMRPx

no other snapshots from this url

23 Sep 2015 17:09:58 UTC

But Crystal, there’s no way women and/or queer people could get jobs in games if there weren’t some sort of communist affirmative action thing going on. *eye roll*

Gary Gygax himself said that women’s brains aren’t suited to gaming, and as we all know, he was an expert on neurology.

“Gary Gygax himself said that women’s brains aren’t suited to gaming”

No reference, of course.

Gary's daughters, Heidi & Elise Gygax.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/27021778@N07/4453962120

 I guess he drove them so far away from gaming, they ended up in the middle of it... somehow...

".. as we all know, he was an expert on neurology”

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/02/men-women-brains-wired-differently
“stark differences exist in the wiring of male and female brains”

http://www.livescience.com/3808-men-women-differently.html
“men have nearly 6.5 times the amount of gray  matter related to general intelligence compared with women, whereas women have  nearly 10 times the amount of white matter related to intelligence compared  to men ... men and women excel at different  types of tasks”

You realise neurologists say men and women are differently wired? Claiming that women weren’t best suited for his games might have been perfectly correct?

I mean, look at what SocJus focusses on. Cool monsters? Dungeons? Mazes?

Nope!

http://funnyjunk.com/Gg+comic/funny-pictures/5561032/

Whether or not A has Y between their loins, or would they prefer X or perhaps Z?

SocJus is obsessed with gender to the point it cannot stop talking about it in a genre where the south wind can serenade the sea, a wall give birth, a sun spin slow thoughts.



SocJus.. is... small.

And Gygax wasn’t. I don’t care if he thought women didn’t like D&D - it was based on wargaming, and women traditionally always rubbished that, too.

But he never stopped women from entering into it. He never banned a game because women liked it and he didn’t. He never thought his personal morality had to be imposed on everyone else, his tastes had to be forced on everyone else.

Not like you do.

Not like Paizo does.

By definition, being a SJW means your Moral Compass is completely broken: http://t.co/vY7iQ8eaLu#GamerGate pic.twitter.com/zuWyALir9x

— Christi Junior (@ChristiJunior) October 4, 2015

Feminists hate being called fascists

... but don't seem to mind being fascists.

This was sent to me in response to http://brett-caton.tumblr.com/post/119326821982/did-you-really-use-1984-in-your-description-as-an

“like i literally just asked you if you related to completely unrelated topics“

No, you literally did no such thing.

“you called me fascist? do you even know what that word means?”

Gosh. I wonder.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

“   :  a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality  — J. W. Aldridge> “

And do feminists tend to totalitarian controls?

They censor art.

They burn books



They attack people who express opinions different to their own.


Feminism is hate
“I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honourable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them.” – Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor; “I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig.” – Andrea Dworkin; “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” – Sally Miller Gearhart

You don't think Orwell would find any of this familiar? He went to war to fight against people like that. He put his life on the line, and spent even his dying days fighting your kind.

You don't like being called a fascist? Yet you are happy to belong to a hate cult that describes people as inferior based on a genetic difference.

Huh.

It's not Feminism; it's Genderism; keep up!

The new Gender Advisor to the Chief of Defence was being interviewed on the ABC and she kept going on about how she would promote the interests of women.


She's not a 'gender' anything, she's a lobbyist, and has nothing to do with gender equality, but Feminism has taken to masking it's female  supremacist doctrine by putting the word 'gender' in place of 'women'.

It's bullshit.

General Hurley said today; “Ms McKay is a well-known advocate for women and I look forward to gaining her insight as we continue to work towards a more inclusive organisation... McKay will continue in her role as Executive Director of the Australian National Committee for UN Women” (source)

Gosh. I have to wonder if there's any chance, any chance at all, that she can do those two jobs fairly; one where she advocates for women only, the other where she is supposed to work for men equally.

The Framework

The Framework demands the outlawing of “group libel” that it defines as “defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group…or members thereof, with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges.”

The Framework said it hopes to take “concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia.”

I am an antifeminist.

For me to say, in public, that feminism erases the crimes of female rapists would become a crime itself - regardless of whether what I say is true.

For me to point out that the gender wage gap is a useful lie, that the global conspiracy of 'Patriarchy' is a myth, or that feminists reinforce gender stereotypes when they are useful ("male tears"), judge others by their appearance so long as they are male ("neckbeards", "fedora-wearers"), and sex-shame men whenever possible with terms like 'creep' and sleaze' whilst demanding females cannot be judged

.. to unveil blatant hypocrisy in condemning the outfits of the dancers in "Blurred Lines" whilst going on topless slut-walks, and always, always, portraying men as wicked, demented, mutated shadows of women.. even to the extreme of making plans to exterminate our kind

to simply mention this as I do now could result in my incarceration.

Feminist Dogma holds that the Patriarchy exists because old white men act for the benefit of all men. Look at the image below. Doesn't this test your faith even a *little*?