Showing posts with label hatecrime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hatecrime. Show all posts

Thursday, 11 August 2016

Criticism of Islam is now hatecrime

Apparently, our lovely Lords and Masters in Parliament passed a bill saying that religious vilification is now hatecrime. http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/act-parliament-passes-religious-vilification-laws-20160804-gqlagu.html

Pointing out, for example, that only one religion pushes gay men out of buildings will get you a fine or a term inside with murderers and rapists, until you learn that it is a religion of peace.




So keep your mouth shut and your thoughts to yourself, unless you are a member of that religion, in which case you now have free rein!

There's no way SocJus will allow you to be prosecuted; instead, they will claim it is the fault of toxic masculinity and capitalism that you raped children and threw a bomb into a hospital.

Indeed, Australia has already seen SocJus rolling out laws that protect discrimination against men - so long as they are white men, of course!















I shall now commit a hatecrime.



https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1c/Charlie_Hebdo_Tout_est_pardonn%C3%A9.jpg


This qualifies, as it offends Muslims.

"Vilification can include social media posts, actions in a workplace and wearing clothes, signs or flags that would incite hatred, contempt, ridicule or revulsion."


Yes, ridicule is counted, despite it being the essence of Free Speech - something that Australia agreed to when it signed up to the UN declaration of Human Rights.


How ashamed I am that the Labor Party and Liberal Party - indistinguishable now - voted as one on this.

Even The Guardian agrees this is a step towards tyranny. For fuck's sake - too extreme for The Guardian?!!






Sunday, 31 July 2016

Feminists can imprison men for off-colour jokes

Paloma Brierley Newton speaking to reporters outside court.
Paloma successful imprisoned a man for hatecrime, after he sent her a joke she didn't like.

When asked why she didn't just block him, she replied "why do you hate all women?"
Yes, that was a joke. She really did have him destroyed, however.

https://archive.is/JqOGH

31 Jul 2016 21:52:32 UTC

"Zane Alchin, 25, from Caringbah, was sentenced ... for using a carriage service to menace"

So what did he say that was so terrible?

"feminists don’t get any action, so when you rape them it feels 100 times tighter”


This is obviously a joke, as even rapists don't want to stick their dicks in... her... (*shudder*)



"to menace"?


How was he menacing anyone?

Feminists joke about drowning boy babies
just in case
they grow up to become antifeminists.

It's totally cool when they do it, amiright?
He might have been annoying, true, but he made no credible threats. Heck, I remember hearing jokes about tossing babies into blenders. Don't recall anyone being arrested for hatecrime back then.



Perhaps it was because we understood that making a joke is nothing like actually doing something?



This man didn't threaten anyone, all he did was make a few crude jokes. Now, I agree they are in bad taste - but if you don't want to read his stuff, it's trivial to block someone on facebook.

Feminists justify laughing at the weeping of men as being a joke...

They justify laughing at the genocide of men as a joke..

... and physical assault? That's fucking hilarious to Feminists!

What feminists have decided is not only that they don't want to hear jokes directed at them, but you aren't allowed to make them in the first place. And they are the ones running the country.

Feminists constantly make the claim that they are an oppressed class, savaged by evil man-beasts as a part of the global conspiracy by all men against all women.

This is from a feminist video clip, where she is pretending to rape a man with a dildo as a joke.
It is perfectly legal, because a feminist is doing it.

If a man made the gender reversed joke, it would be a crime.
Fainting Couch Feminists
are always ready to be offended,
always ready to be threatened,
always ready to claim to be powerless.

Yet they can get men destroyed on a whim.

Who, exactly, is powerless?

Who, exactly, is the oppressed?

Parodying Feminism is now hatecrime?
Why is it Feminists cannot take a joke?



Morgan was one of the founders of Modern Feminism,
and has
- with the aid of other man-haters like Dworkin
- shaped the movement in her image.

Feminists write our laws.

Feminists hate half of humanity.

Why do we give them that power?


Who is really in power here?

Who is it who gets to ruin someone's life over a joke?



Follow-up:


Apparently I wasn't sufficiently clear when i said I was joking about Paloma imprisoning a man. He is currently at large, albeit with severe restrictions on his freedom, and - potentially -  will remain so.

The planet he was living on, however, was not so lucky.

http://i.makeagif.com/media/1-20-2014/R4dNiC.gif


Feminists do not forgive, and they do not forget. Consider yourself warned.

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01608/Andrea_Dworkin_1608899f.gif

Wednesday, 13 July 2016

"I think you are beautiful" is now hatecrime, thanks to Feminism

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3687983/Wolf-whistling-HATE-crime-Police-force-starts-recording-uninvited-verbal-engagement-men-women-category-racist-abuse.html

"The force has spent three months training officers and staff on misogyny hate crime, and said it covers ‘incidents against women that are motivated by an attitude of a man towards a woman’."
https://archive.is/6vcV4#selection-1117.159-1125.271

A hate crime is simply any incident, which may or may not be deemed as a criminal offence, which is perceived by the victim or any other person, as being motivated by prejudice or hatred.

Feminists PERCEIVE straight men as being motivated by hatred.
Why should we give their feelings power?

Even if you hated men
- wouldn't you want the women who want men
to be able to find them?

Misogyny hate crime, in addition to the general hate crime definition, may be understood as incidents against women that are motivated by an attitude of a man towards a woman, and includes behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman. 

Examples of this may include unwanted or uninvited sexual advances"

So they have moved the goalposts of misogyny so any incident that any woman dislikes is interpreted as a crime against all women everywhere. Any sexual advance or anything "which is perceived by the victim or any other person", i.e. Feminists, who perceive everything a man does as being motivated by prejudice or hatred.

How do Feminists get away with conflating a sexual advance with a hatecrime?


Repetition! They love the term "cat-calling" because it means anything they want it to - it's never clearly defined. It's about feelings, not facts.



Say you hate Julia Gillard, like me. You say "I hate Julia Gillard!"

Well, that's hatecrime, you racist, and it means you will be punished.

Say you are a Muslim and you say "I hate homosexuals and atheists, and look forward to implementing Sharia so we can kill them all" - well, that's just diversity and if you object to that, you're sexist!

"Police, who have been working with Nottingham Women’s Centre on the subject, added that the crime includes ‘behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman’. "

"behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman"

Hmm.

Like the words "I think you are beautiful" or "Would you like my phone number?"

That is now hatecrime.

Telling someone that you find them attractive... is hatecrime.

But only if it's from a man to a woman, of course.

Lesbians, you can do any bloody thing to women and the cops will just look the other way! Go for it! We don't care!

 I Was Raped By A Woman At A Party, And No One Did Anything

"There were seven of us at the sleepover. One woman showed particular interest in me, and started asking me questions about my love life. I thought nothing of it -- people are interested in others' relationships all the time, right?
I told her my marriage was on the rocks and I was upset that I hadn't had sex in quite a while. She looked into my eyes and I thought I noticed a hint of longing in her eyes as she said, "But, you're so sexy. You deserve to have sex." "








Final note:


This is some feedback I had on this by a Feminist.

Yeah.

They really are a horrible group of people.











Wednesday, 1 June 2016

EU gives Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and Microsoft 24 hours to censor all 'hate speech'

http://hri.ugis.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/image/fsps_0.jpg
Remember when Social Justice meant fighting for Free Speech?



http://www.mirror.co.uk/tech/eu-gives-facebook-twitter-youtube-8089780

Facebook European Union

Also see Facebook Signs European Union Pledge To Suppress Loosely Defined ‘Hate Speech’ And Promote ‘Counter Narratives’

Who determines what is hatespeech? Feminists do. What is the official definition?

"public incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin".
Maria Abbasi was burned to death.

It's now a crime to criticise the culture that does this.

Incitement to violence is already a crime - but to hatred?

Religions - literally - demonise other religions. Will they be banned? Of course not.

Most Feminists are critics of Christianity. Will they be banned? Heck no, they protect their own.

Feminists call me a "white c*nt" all the time. If I report it - I'm told piously by Facebook that that is acceptable, but when i called a Feminist a goblin, I was banned for 24 hours.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/lowres.cartoonstock.com/animals-kangaroo-kangaroo_court-court-legal_preceding-law-wpa0873_low.jpgFeminists vilify all males, all whites, all straights and even everyone who isn't transexual, and they do it with impunity because they are judge and jury of the kangaroo courts.

I don't like most religions, and i particularly dislike Islam. If that one religion ceased to exist, the world would fall into peace. Perhaps another ideology would emerge that was as toxic - poverty is one of the drivers of it's attraction, after all.

It used to be Communism and Fascism that produced terrorism and war. Perhaps in the future, Feminism will be remembered in exactly the same way.

There's a (censored) discussion on Twitter about it on the tag

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

The Framework

The Framework demands the outlawing of “group libel” that it defines as “defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group…or members thereof, with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges.”

The Framework said it hopes to take “concrete action to combat intolerance, in particular with a view to eliminating racism, colour bias, ethnic discrimination, religious intolerance, totalitarian ideologies, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-feminism and homophobia.”

I am an antifeminist.

For me to say, in public, that feminism erases the crimes of female rapists would become a crime itself - regardless of whether what I say is true.

For me to point out that the gender wage gap is a useful lie, that the global conspiracy of 'Patriarchy' is a myth, or that feminists reinforce gender stereotypes when they are useful ("male tears"), judge others by their appearance so long as they are male ("neckbeards", "fedora-wearers"), and sex-shame men whenever possible with terms like 'creep' and sleaze' whilst demanding females cannot be judged

.. to unveil blatant hypocrisy in condemning the outfits of the dancers in "Blurred Lines" whilst going on topless slut-walks, and always, always, portraying men as wicked, demented, mutated shadows of women.. even to the extreme of making plans to exterminate our kind

to simply mention this as I do now could result in my incarceration.

Feminist Dogma holds that the Patriarchy exists because old white men act for the benefit of all men. Look at the image below. Doesn't this test your faith even a *little*?


Friday, 18 October 2013

EU to ban antifeminist speech

"“Group libel” means: defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group as defined in paragraph (a) – or members thereof – with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges."

So ridiculing feminism is a crime? People ridicule political movements they oppose all the time; why is feminism so privileged that it cannot even be criticised?

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf – The European framework national statute for the promotion of tolerance – full text (in English)

And since when did feminism prove it's points? Is the Patriarchy Hypothesis something that's ever been subjected to rigorous examination?

Well, it can't be after this is passed. That would be "subjecting it to false charges". Charging it with being wrong, or actively deceitful.

So who gets to decide what's a true charge and what's false? It does.

Judge, jury and executioner all in one.

Discussion here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/suggested-reading/eu-to-ban-anti-feminist-speech/

Sunday, 6 October 2013

Why do MRAs compare Feminism and Nazism?

It's not like feminists are throwing people into gas chambers!


But.. have a look at this argument.

The Nazis were around well before the heavy-duty violence and the gas chambers. And for quite some time they operated in a manner that paralleled in many ways the more recent activities of feminists.

(By making)  this comparison, it brings to the attention of people the kind of forces that gave rise to Nazism and it makes them understand a little better the horribleness of discrimination and demonisation.

Both feminism and Nazism have
  • discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code
  • promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally
  • promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labelled as ‘parasites’
  • promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed
  • promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated
  • demonised the target group by labelling them as perverts and sexual criminals
  • sought to break the target group away from their families
  • promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society
  • disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own ideology
  • disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters
  • used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out
  • promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent ‘victims’ of the targeted group
  • demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group e.g. preferential job placements for women 
  • discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace 
  • perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in the law e.g. in family courts
  • arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the courtroom e.g. in sex-assault cases. 
  • arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to ‘prove’ their innocence e.g. in sex-assault and domestic violence cases
  • arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be deemed ‘a crime’, e.g. where nowadays the ‘feelings’ of women rather than the behaviours of men are the determinants of what constitutes ‘a crime’
  • arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her - at her whim - to be a worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby - with all the ramifications of this - regardless of how the father might feel about it all (also sexual harassment, etc.) 
  • arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of the privileged group for the very same crime e.g. in domestic violence and murder cases. 
  • arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have to pay child support
  • arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the targeted group were shown undue leniency - and were often actually applauded for their actions
  • arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences, e.g. domestic violence, sexual harassment
  • arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group e.g. alimony, child custody. 
  • arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised e.g. biased ‘hate speech’ laws.
  • punished those who protested against the prevailing ideology; e.g. for being politically-incorrect.
  • effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology
  • consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group
  • ran government-funded educational courses in universities (e.g. Women’s Studies, Title IX) and in schools to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group. 
  • persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group, e.g. “A women needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” “Men think about sex every 15 seconds.”
Bar the heavy violence and the gas chambers - which came towards the end of the Nazis hold on power - feminism and early Nazism are rather similar.

(source)


And with regards to the Gas Chambers... Have you ever noticed how popular The Female Man is, even now, still getting new editions out, still preaching the extermination of all men, nary a critical word from Feminists anywhere... a book that, if you substitute 'Jew' for 'Man', would perfectly fit into Hitler's Final Solution?

Saturday, 5 October 2013

A genderation gap

They sat together, discussing the weekly newspaper. It was a brilliant day, just a little too hot, a little too early in the season, which was another record set in decades of records broken for heatwaves and wild weather.. he had never thought he would miss the gentle dank rains of his childhood here.

"It's like what you say those Feminists do."

He wasn't quite sure where that had come from. Sometimes she seemed to be having a conversation with someone else, or picking up from where they had been years ago. She was far more lucid during the day, but even so, he knew she was slipping, and there was less time left than he cared to think about.

He looked over the articles he had been reading out to her. Which had triggered this off? Should he ask? She could get terribly upset if she was reminded of her problem, or suspected him of pussyfooting around her... bit of a catch-22, sometimes.

Oh, right. He had been reading out the story of a meeting by MRAs, which had been attacked by a group of Feminists. Despite being filmed, the police wouldn't intervene, except when the men involved started fighting back.. and even then it was just to arrest the men.

"They really did do this, Mum. See, it's in the paper.."

"Oh, you can't believe everything you read!"

"Mum, it's everywhere. The group says they had to defend themselves against anti-feminist attacks.. they are quite open about what they've done".

"It's that bloody Rupert Murdoch!"

"He's dead, Mum. The Murdochs don't own papers anymore, they're strictly blogotainment... "

She interrupted: "He was always making up those lies!" Her face was flushed and he realised he had better calm her down in a hurry. She could have another stroke, or worse..

"Never mind that, Mum.. what about I get you an iced tea?"

"Bloody lies! About that bomb! I never planted a bomb!"

He walked quickly to the counter, not wanting to hear any more.

"What... what is she talking about?" he thought, horrified. He remembered the cell they had been in as a child, and the looks the women used to give him. They were not friendly looks. They didn't ... like... men.. but he was tolerated as a small child. He didn't look enough like the enemy. Not yet.

He tried to think about a bombing. There had been that attempt on Malcolm Frasier. Wasn't that from Amanda Marga or ... well, some name like that?

They had denied it, but had hung nevertheless. Treason was still a capital offense, back then, although he was pretty sure it was life imprisonment instead now.

Damn, it was a woman at the counter.... don't look longer than 8 seconds, that's looking intently. Three years at Her Majesty's Pleasure, which mostly involved involuntary sodomy. Her Majesty, Queen Dianna. One sadistic bitch.

He looked at the menu, and grabbed his wallet. If he looked at her hands, did that count? Best to put the money on the counter.

The order blurted, change returned (only nearly dropped this time, it's not easy if you can't see it), and little number received... his hand was shaking a little. He would have loved a coffee too, but he was nervous enough as it was.

Could she have done it?

No surely not.. but they could have. Those women with hate in their hearts, the books of gendercide lining their shelves; they dreamt of violent revolution and joked of the screams of men... bathing in male tears, they called it. That was just talk, wasn't it?

Just talk. Just talking about opposing feminism was a hatecrime now.

Suddenly he wished he knew how to build a bomb himself.

He pushed that thought down.

She'd fallen asleep, face slack against the wall. He'd wake her when the tea arrived. He slipped on his reflective sunglasses so no woman could accuse him of male gazing, and stared at the sky. It was blue, empty of the merest hint of cloud, but somehow he knew something dark and ugly was blowing from the south.