Showing posts with label sexual harassment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexual harassment. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 May 2016

Feminists to outlaw "looking" and "commenting" by men as sexcrime.

In fact, one of the way humans reproduced was that they spoke to each other, even when they did not know each other beforehand. This would now be classed as harassment, of course, and should be punishable with severe penalties for any male found doing it, or, if two women are involved, any male found being near by when it happens.


Stop looking at her with your lust,
you rapist!

This graffiti in a neighborhood in Cairo is emblazoned with the words "no harassment" in Arabic.
Here we have a Feminist dealing with men in the approved fashion,
by killing them as the cockroaches that they are.



A reply to

"We want men to stop"


https://theconversation.com/we-want-men-to-stop-honking-their-horn-at-women-because-they-respect-them-not-for-fear-of-punishment-57337

5 May 2016 10:16:30 UTC

(It's been interesting that this street harassment is defined so broadly that any human interaction can be counted. I remember how harassment used to be defined, and that one of the key words was that it was repeated after the person said "no".)

Looking or commenting about these strong and empowered wimmin
is further proof that all men hate all womyn of colour.

The removal of men's eyes and tongues should be mandatory
to prevent more brave and stunning wymyn
from suffering from their gaze.

Let's define our terms.


http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/harassment

" the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands."

Extending that to comments like "hello" and acts like "looking longer than an undefined length of time" is a sign of how brave and empowered strong wimmin of colour have become that they no longer need to worry about "speaking English" or "being sensible".


Having solved the problem of harassment by imprisoning all the males, the next level of approach would be their gentle and harmless extermination, followed by a cleansing incineration and burial.

However, the problem of how to continue funding into harassment continues. Since women cannot, by definition, be responsible for harm - that's the basis of the Duluth Model, after all - the logical solution is, of course, to simply re-designate some of the women as men.

Then they can be blamed for such crimes as "glancing" and "commenting".


Whilst some misogynists might argue that this will result in human extinction, and other white men might mansplain to us beautiful strong and empowered femmes that this wouldn't result in anything but the destruction of Western civilisation at the hands of some "sane" culture (which is ableist, racist and transphobic as well), we all know that utopia is the only possible result.

https://static-secure.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2015/3/27/1427476979699/Andrea-Dworkin-009.jpg
"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp
with a high-heel shoved in his mouth,
like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
We have Listened and Believed. All praise the word of Dworkin!






"Bianca Fileborn receives funding from La Trobe University to undertake research on street harassment."

So it's not like she's going to find anything but the need for more funding. The fact that the many street cameras/phones etc don't show any evidence of the 'epidemic' is just proof of how nasty men are - they turn invisible whenever they attack a strong and empowered wymyn of colour.

"Victoria State Government provides funding as a strategic partner of The Conversation AU"

So this is taxpayer funding being used to create new laws that will imprison men who look at or speak to their 'betters' - women.

FUCK OFF, YOU CUNTS.

And I say that with all due respect.




Further Reading:

Cat Calling:



Male Gaze:


Saturday, 12 October 2013

The Nonconsensual Sexualization of the Sexual Sexosystemssssss

misandry-mermaid:
“Let’s say a woman is trying to be seductive. What the hell makes you think you’re the one she’s trying to seduce? And if you aren’t, what the hell makes you think you have any right to shove yourself into her business?

Your thoughts are your own: you are free to notice her, think about her, fantasize, etc.–you are not free to involve her, through actions or words that disclose what’s going on in your pants, unless she specifically consents and makes it clear.

It astonishes me to no end that men have a problem with this. A lot of guys wouldn’t appreciate being hit on by someone they’re not interested in–but they expect women to accept it.”
— Nahida S.N., The Nonconsensual Sexualization of Unintending Young Women (via cyberteeth)
Let’s say every person in the world believes this. Let’s say one of those people, a woman, is trying to be seductive. None of the men or women around her can be sure who she’s trying to seduce, so none of them approach her.

Eventually she decides that she will just have to approach the man she’s trying to seduce. She does, and she starts to flirt with him.

He is outraged. “How dare you approach me?! Does it look like I’m trying to seduce you?! I’m just trying to have a beer with some friends!” He looks her up and down. “I might have been interested in you, if you hadn’t actually approached me and made it clear that your were interested in me! Get away from me you pervert!”

All of the man’s friends echo his sentiments, and a security guard, noticing the hubbub, swiftly removes the seductive woman from the premises. “If you’re going to incite disorderly behaviour with such inappropriate sexual innuendo, you’re not welcome here.”

All across the world men and women alike are having similar experiences to the seductive woman. Sex is extremely rare, but everybody wanks a lot while having fantasies about each other. Politicians are panicking because reproduction has all but ceased, and birth rates are plummeting. Eventually, the human race becomes extinct.

In the last moments of her life, the last human alive thinks to herself, probably in Chinese, “why did feminists have to be offended by ordinary human social interactions?”




Wednesday, 2 October 2013

To the mothers of sons everywhere


Imagine Albert, Ethan and Anton are your three, much loved sons, and Janet is your daughter, that you raised with your husband Bill .

You have taught them to be good, to respect women, and they never say anything that isn't correct or do anything that isn't correct. They attend the rallies as allies, they applaud at the slutwalks and look forward to earning less relatively than their fathers did.

They leave, and travel the world.

Albert, at 16, goes to India. There, a woman decides to take him without his consent. Albert is shattered, he can't believe a woman would betray him like that, he's been so good.. he goes to the cops, who laugh at him. She didn't break the law.

Ethan, who hasn't heard of Albert's fate, is in France, hanging out with his lesbian friend. She spots some cutie walking past, and points her out. Ethan sees her now, and looks... but is seen. Ethan is charged with looking intently, and imprisoned... for three years. Inside, he will be raped and brutalised. He will learn to hate women. He will take his revenge before dying.

Anton hears of their fates. Embittered, he commits crimes with Janet, who shares his every misdeed.  He is sentenced to jail for decades, where he will escape by ending his life. She gets weekend detention and therapy.

Bill, in Europe, campaigns against these injustices - and is arrested for antifeminism. He should have kept quiet, known his place.

"You should have had girls", your friend says. "They're never any trouble".

"But what about Bill"?

"He had it coming", she laughs.






Saturday, 28 September 2013

A wittle pway

Andreya: Breasts are asexual! Stop sexualising breasts!
Carol: (*walking past*) Your hair looks lovely!
Andreya: Thank you!
Brett: So breasts aren't any more sexual than hair?
Andreya: Of course they aren't, it's only men who claimed they were any different!
Brett: Ok then.. your breasts look lovely!
Andreya: How dare you! That's sexual harassment! Guards, arrest this fiend for sexcrime!


If breasts are just asexual, why do breasts swell during arousal? Why is it that women’s brains seem to process nipple and genital stimulation in the same way?

"stimulation of the nipple activated an area of the brain known as the genital sensory cortex. This is the same brain region activated by stimulation of the clitoris, vagina, and cervix."(source)

"As she gets more and more aroused, her breasts will swell a little and her nipples will become more prominent." (source)