My thoughts on "Titwindows and boobsocks"

I think it's terrifying that Kate says that artists "must be held accountable".


That is straight out of every bloody fascist regime. Will she demand they be forced to repent for drawing women who are prettier than she is, that like having sex with men? Will there be executions for the likes of Frank Cho?

I play to win! GG! D.Va Cosplay

1:57:15 There's two ways of looking at the boob-butt pose. a) it's physically possible - female cosplayers have demonstrated it. (Note: The cosplayer here is doing the 'boob-butt' pose that drives feminists berserk - that they claim is impossible for real women to do.)

Can't find the particular shots i was thinking of but you can see similar examples here: 










b) it's an example of how comics show human 'reality' rather than objective reality - our senses are not like cameras, we see the world by taking a chunk of time and working out what is happening from that - thus the camera shows a still but we see a variety of stills and create an illusion of motion - to depict that in a comic means you can't just replicate the camera's viewpoint.

A lot of good comic art from history is a composite in one frame of several distinct actions.

This was understood implicitly. Now everyone has cameras and expects the world to look exactly like cameras show it as being - which robs the art of dynamism. e.g. "Saga of the Super-Sons" image

The speech clearly takes farrrr longer than the motion of removing the poster. Several minutes are compressed in on panel to an instant of time.

Same story in this Batman and Robin pop-art piece.

Eadweard Muybridge was actually quite shocking, because for the first time he revealed that the camera could not and did not depict reality in the way the human visual system does.

See this Elk's motion below - it actually appears to be quite static. A 'realistic' depiction is thus robbing the image of information it needs for a human to see it as in motion.

Kate Bush.

I see her, and my heart flutters, oh!

"Tits and dicks are not the same" - in fact that is exactly what feminists argue when it's convenient for them - and they want to say that breasts are asexual - then they argue the opposite when they claim that touching a breast is rape - which implies it is a sexual act.

You can't have it both ways.

In fact, why are feminists objecting to male depictions of women that show nipples - when feminists didn't wear bras deliberately because they didn't think nipples should be something to be ashamed of (i was there in the seventies and i actually kinda miss those times e.g. Kate Bush to the right).


Should we #HideTheNipple or #FreeTheNipple? They seem to want it both ways. Nipples must be exposed, but men can feel no joy from them?

I don't know, Feminists?

Why is it you cannot make your mind up about this question?
The answer is, of course - female sexuality good, male sexuality  - baaaaad!

http://oglaf.com/oriel/

Buzzfeed hypocrites - it's only sexist when men do it

From an article on why women judging men on their butts is empowerment while men judging women is eye-rape.

Katelyn Elizabeth

"Because men can be ogled and still be treated like people, while women get ogled and treated as objects"

You can justify any atrocity with that logic. It's not even true that women are treated as objects; you aren't put to death if you damage an object, and if you 'rape' one, people think you are just absurd and pathetic.

Women are not objects, and the only times they were treated as objects were the same as that when men were.

So you are saying injustices against your tribe can be justified by imagined injustices in the past. That argument is always used for genocide. The Hutus and the Tutsis; the Nazis and the Jews; we've seen it all before, over and over.

You see an act and describe it as wrong. You see it again, and decide it is now right - it was done by your side - against the enemy - how can it be wrong?

There is no justice to your kind. There is certainly no equality beyond endless lip-service.

You make me wish there was a hell, just so you and the rest of your hypocritical harpies could meet some sort of justice. Instead, I shall just use you as yet another example of how corrupt your movement has become, to recruit others to my cause.

Fare poorly.

Objectification

According to Feminists,
it is impossible to be a free agent,
a sapient being,
unless you are not desirable to men.

whoneedsfeminism: I need feminism because we are subjects, not sexual objects

Feminists say "men think women are objects".

You don't give an object two Nobel prizes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie

or give it the power to have men decapitated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_I_of_England

or to rewrite laws and start wars.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher

Women who aren't Feminists don't know to be weak.

http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/smart-beautiful-deadly-19-year-old-russian-sniper-roza-shanina-54-confirmed-kills/

They don't need to be empowered.

They don't need to be saved.

http://military.wikia.com/wiki/Women_Airforce_Service_Pilots

No-one needs Feminism.

They need to feel their courage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svetlana_Savitskaya

To fight besides men, united, against the evils of the world

http://tribune.com.pk/story/761757/kurdish-female-fighters-face-is-militants-in-iraqs-north/

instead of against men, knowing only hate for men...

http://bloviatingzeppelin.net/tags/archbishop-andre-joseph-leonard/

---

See Also:

NSFW: Why do Feminists hate sex?

The Nonconsensual Sexualization of the Sexual Sexosystemssssss

From Antifeminist Egalitarian

27th Aug 2013 | 5,315 notes

misandry-mermaid:

“Let’s say a woman is trying to be seductive. What the hell makes you think you’re the one she’s trying to seduce? And if you aren’t, what the hell makes you think you have any right to shove yourself into her business?

Your thoughts are your own: you are free to notice her, think about her, fantasize, etc.–you are not free to involve her, through actions or words that disclose what’s going on in your pants, unless she specifically consents and makes it clear.

It astonishes me to no end that men have a problem with this. A lot of guys wouldn’t appreciate being hit on by someone they’re not interested in–but they expect women to accept it.”

— Nahida S.N., The Nonconsensual Sexualization of Unintending Young Women (via cyberteeth)

Let’s say every person in the world believes this. Let’s say one of those people, a woman, is trying to be seductive. None of the men or women around her can be sure who she’s trying to seduce, so none of them approach her.

Eventually she decides that she will just have to approach the man she’s trying to seduce. She does, and she starts to flirt with him.

He is outraged. “How dare you approach me?! Does it look like I’m trying to seduce you?! I’m just trying to have a beer with some friends!” He looks her up and down. “I might have been interested in you, if you hadn’t actually approached me and made it clear that your were interested in me! Get away from me you pervert!”

All of the man’s friends echo his sentiments, and a security guard, noticing the hubbub, swiftly removes the seductive woman from the premises. “If you’re going to incite disorderly behaviour with such inappropriate sexual innuendo, you’re not welcome here.”

All across the world men and women alike are having similar experiences to the seductive woman. Sex is extremely rare, but everybody wanks a lot while having fantasies about each other. Politicians are panicking because reproduction has all but ceased, and birth rates are plummeting. Eventually, the human race becomes extinct.

In the last moments of her life, the last human alive thinks to herself, probably in Chinese, “why did feminists have to be offended by ordinary human social interactions?”

Feminist apologise for being wrong about Objectification!

Women rate images of men more highly the larger their penises are, according to a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.


Gosh, so women objectify men as much as vice versa? Who knew? I can't wait to see all the apologies from Feminists.. I mean, they respond to facts and reason, right?

(*crickets*)

Yep, yep, faced with this evidence, they'll be sure to change their ways.

(*wolves howl in the distance*)



Any day now...






















any day...