Why do Feminists hate Fathers?

The rhetoric is that they fight for equality...

The reality is they fight only for women
- so long as they are the right type of women.

Why do Feminists demand this man be separated from his son?

In Australia, and in some other western countries now,
Feminists have created new laws to forbid these two travelling together by public transport.

This 110 year old man is considered too dangerous to travel in a carriage with a woman,
even if it's with his 90 year old daughter.

Presumably his "male gaze" shoots out like lasers, incinerating the Damsels in Distress. (source)

Feminists claim to be oppressed - yet what other lobby group in the last century has had so much political power over the Parliaments and Senates of democracies?

http://siryouarebeingmocked.tumblr.com/post/143246032914/most-powerful-american-feminist-organization-kills

NOW claims credit for healing the sick, raising the dead, and inventing the cappuccino

https://archive.is/nw7GF webpage capture saved from  http://now.org/blog/how-feminism-and-now-have-helped-men/#comment-326997 19 Jun 2015, 21:08:04 UTC

This is the most dishonest thing I have ever read. As others have said, Joseph Goebbels would be proud.

"LGBT rights are women’s and men’s rights"

Feminist have been no friend to gay and transexual men. Sorry, I watched them applaud as gay men were arrested here in Australia. Seriously, do you know nothing of the history of feminism?? Transmen and women have been vilified as gender traitors and psuedo-women. They were banned from meetings.

From http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/08/04/woman-2

Robin Morgan, the keynote speaker, said:

I will not call a male “she”; thirty-two years of suffering in this androcentric society, and of surviving, have earned me the title “woman”; one walk down the street by a male transvestite, five minutes of his being hassled (which he may enjoy), and then he dares, he dares to think he understands our pain? No, in our mothers’ names and in our own, we must not call him sister.

"When feminist groups changed the norms of sexual behavior"

In some parallel universe? In this one, medical scientists working on the pill and hippies who had nothing to do with feminism were responsible. Meanwhile, feminists argue that women who have sex with men are gender traitors, and have done since the 1960s. c.f. "The Feminist Initiative" for an example, or anything by Dworkin et al.

"Feminism has fought against sexual violence, including sexual violence against men."

Oh yes, Mary P. Koss fought very hard to make sure women who raped men could be prosecuted... what's that? She did the opposite? Deliberately? How shocking! And feminists fought for immunity to rape charges in Israel and India? No! How can it be? It's not like the Duluth Model defines violence as masculine!

Oh wait, it does. And NOW is it's biggest fan. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/duluth-and-vawa-power-and-control.html

"Feminism fought for an end to gendered segregation at work and in school...  boys and girls have equal access to education."

Absolute nonsense; it's fought hard to deny men the ability to teach at schools on the grounds they are all secret pedophiles (all the while ignoring the torrent of female teachers diddling their pupils).

Men used to teach school everywhere. Feminists pushed them out and now male teachers are becoming as rare as hen's teeth.

And feminists constantly call for quotas for women and scholarships for women, and male education plummets. Fewer and fewer men can get a degree now.

 Feminists want men to do jobs, of course - the dirty, dangerous jobs - but nothing else. You'll never see a quota for women working in sewage, up power lines, down mine pits or clearing mine fields.

Men are *useful* apes to them - nothing more.

" VAWA protects male victims of domestic violence."

Rubbish. It does the opposite. Primary Aggressor laws mean that a man who calls for help had better have a recording of the violence against him or he will be the one arrested. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/primary-or-predominant-aggressor-laws.html

In Australia, thanks to VAWA exporting it's model world wide, women have a helpline to call for help from DV - and men get a line to confess they have hurt a woman. You need help? Go to hell, male scum. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/tthe-duluth-model-of-misandry.html

"Feminists have long fought for economic justice for both women and men."

Rubbish. The Feminist Initiative fights for special male-only taxes, Feminists fight for tax exemptions to female only goods, they fight for scholarships for women and claim men are overpaid by as much as 30 cents in the dollar - despite the repeated testimony from economists to the contrary.

They have no interest in justice. Justice is paying men more because they work harder, they work longer hours, they do more dangerous jobs that result in a death rate a magnitude higher in the workplace. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/basic-research-you-say-dont-mind-if-i.html

Feminists don't think that's just; they want women to be paid the same but have cushy, safe jobs? http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2015/05/childcare-workers-to-be-paid-as-much-as.html

 How will that work? They don't seem interested in pushing women into those nasty jobs. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2015/05/feminists-plan-to-cut-mens-wages.html

NOW, I know you love lies - but do you have to be this obvious? Why not paint MRAs as being responsible for school shootings, or claim economists are part of the global conspiracy against you? Stick to fear and hate; it's what you are best at. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/now-feminism-and-historical-revisionism.html

NOW, Feminism, and Historical Revisionism

http://web.archive.org/web/20070708213232/http://michnow.org/jointcustody507.htm interests me because it keeps coming up in debates between feminists, who claim they want joint custody, and anti-feminists, who point out that their actions directly contradict this.


http://np.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/2xk11d/cmv_feminism_isnt_the_answer_for_men/

wrt89 says:
 Feminists fight AGAINST men’s rights.

(screenshot; right click/view image to see large view)

Here are some examples to prove my point.

Father’s rights group want shared parenting (equal custody) to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit. They feel that men should not be punished for being men, and that women should not be awarded custody to their kids simply for being women. Currently women are awarded primary custody almost all the time, even if the husband was the stay-at-home Dad and the woman was the breadwinner.

Feminists fought against this. You can read NOW’s own statement here. Also note their usage of anti-male lies, i.e. “fathers are abusive, don’t give them custody.” That is from 1997, but still remains valid today.