Showing posts with label sexism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexism. Show all posts

Friday, 13 May 2016

Feminist hates men because they know she hates men.

A reaction to https://archive.is/6LiLp

12 May 2016 20:09:29 UTC

archived from http://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/features/a20338/dating-while-black-and-feminist/



"Do you just...hate men?"

Total shot in the dark, but I'm going to say... yes.


I love the fact she never actually denies that. She's just mad he's allowed to ask the question.



"It was not the first time a man had asked me this question."



Yet men don't ask other women that question. Perhaps some alarm bells should be ringing? Some self-examination might be in order? No, of course not! Logic is for the enemy!



 "despite the fact that I'm not one to ever be silenced—especially by such a cheap, clichéd trick"



 There's no trick. It's a straight question that men keep asking you and you keep deflecting away from. You seem to be giving men the impression you hate them. I can see why.




https://saboteur365.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/we-hate-men1.jpg




"My partner, who'd asked me to teach him more about why women need safe spaces, was the one derailing the conversation."


http://southparkstudios.mtvnimages.com/images/shows/south-park/clip-thumbnails/season-19/1908/south-park-s19e08c13-in-their-safe-space_16x9.jpg?
No dissent past this point. Free thoughts will be confiscated!



You consider having your partner raise the worry that you hate him... derailling? You had something more important to talk about while watching TV?



WHAT THE FUCK WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THAT?




 "During sacred Netflix and Chill time."



 Ok, I don't know if you hate men, but we sure as fuck hate you now. Your partner was reaching out to you with an incredibly important question - the one that would determine whether or not you have a future - and you want to focus on the TV instead.


Reaction GIF: fuck you, angry, Bryan Cranston, Walter White, Breaking Bad
 Fuck. You.


"Talk about fragile masculinity."



Oh yes, it's a sign of how fragile masculinity is that we have feelings other than lust and anger. That we care if our partners love us.



Feminists love to claim men are emotional cripples who can't express their feelings
- then despise them when they express their feelings


What. A. Bitch.






""In this patriarchal society, women are socialized to coddle male egos and not to ask 'too much' of men or risk losing everything "



Women - in all 'patriarchal' societies - ask men to DIE for them - and most men go and do it.



Jesus bloody Christ. If you don't want to "coddle male egos" - i.e. have a supportive relationship - then don't. No-one is forcing you to.

Piss off with your sisterhood and you can bitch together about how periods are caused by Patriarchy - we don't care.







" Do they get that our society is so deeply invested in preserving patriarchy that groups of old white men throughout the country"


From http://s20.photobucket.com/user/dtomchay/media/HLHBnl9.jpg.html

Raaah! (*cut to scenes of hordes of old white men rampaging through the city streets*)





 "are succeeding at stripping women of their legal rights "



 Citation needed. Name one right men have that women do not. I know of many women have that men do not.




" in the year 2016?"



Oh no! It's [current year]. How come I don't have everything I want when it's [current year]?



" While some men may think Black women making $0.64 to the dollar of what men make isn't fair"

No, it's a crime.  Men made it a crime. You are lying.


" who's ready to chip in that $.36 to even it out?"

We are willing to trade higher total earnings for you dying at eleven times the rate - which is what we do to get those big bucks, the extra money comes from the harder jobs that you avoid.

But I noticed you also ignore the fact that ethnically asian people earn way more than you do. Maybe it's because they work hard and get degrees that will give them good incomes instead of bloody Social Justice degrees?



"who's actually interested in doing the hard, long work of decolonizing heteronormative relationships? "

You think heterosexuality is abnormal, despite the massive amount of evidence against you? So why write this shit-piece whining about heterosexual relationships if you don't think being heterosexual is normal? Go have sex with your cat or something - we don't care so long as you don't keep us awake at night!


"Who is ready to decolonize the world?"

Feminists, apparently. Not going to be a lot of people if you get rid of heterosexual relationships.



"Because toxic masculinity isn't just unfair, or annoying, or detrimental—it kills women."

Citation needed. Most deaths from violence are of men. But lets imagine that men really are these horrible monsters of the Feminist imagination.

http://mydisguises.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/eccc12ss-10.jpg
Grr! Argh!


...http://www.drodd.com/images13/monster-gif7.gif

YOU JUST WROTE AN ARTICLE ON HOW ANGRY YOU WERE THAT YOUR LOVER ASKED YOU IF YOU HATED MEN - AND IN THE ARTICLE YOU EXPLAIN... THAT MEN ARE MONSTERS.

If we are monsters, then (do i really need to spell this out?)


then indeed you fucking do hate men. Your lover was right, and your every word is a lie not only to the reader but to yourself.





"The leading cause of death for Black women and girls ages 15-35 is domestic violence or intimate partner violence. "

Citation needed. Lesbian DV rates are higher, so if anything all you are pointing out is that modern women are living very safe lives.


"Black women suffer the highest rates of intraracial violence."

Citation needed. White people suffer from violence from back people in the US far more than vice versa, so I'm not sure if you really want to play that card.


"And it starts in small, seemingly innocuous ways, like sitting on a panel and whining about its lack of inclusion instead of giving your seat to a qualified woman of color who could do it better anyway."

Citation needed. One of the reasons we don't just give jobs away according to your privilege point system is because the person who can do it better is the one who competes for the fucking job. Just giving a job to someone because you think they have the 'right' skin colour is what other countries have done, yes.

http://whitworth125.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/2W.1-Apartheid-simulation.jpg

So that's what you want to build? Why not head off to Zimbabwe - plenty of fellow believers in that racist bullshit over there!

http://www.economicshelp.org/wp-content/uploads/blog-uploads/2008/04/709px-ZWDvUSDchart.png
This is what happens when the ideologues give out jobs to the 'right' people,

not the people who earn the position the hard way. (source)



"It's denying you're a misogynist because you "don't hate women," without realizing that thinking women deserve less than you isn't love."

Nor would it be hate, you stupid twat, even by your own logic. I don't hate bugs or trees or goldfish but I do see them as lesser beings.

Even if your partner did think that your life was less important than his - fucking unlikely, I know which of you is more likely to die for the other if shit goes down - that wouldn't mean he hated you. and you haven't advanced one whit of evidence that he saw you as a lesser being.
Jon Blunk,  Alex Teves and Matt McQuinn were killed in the Aurora shooting, as they used their bodies to shield their girlfriends.
Three young men, each in different parts of theater nine, who gave their lives to protect their girlfriends. (source)

Man dies protecting girlfriend
Moodley was stabbed at about 8.30pm at the Fordsburg Square flea market
after shopping with Jagar on Saturday, April 26 as he tried to defend his future wife. (source)




Men give their lives to put women first
- and I have to wonder is it that Feminists don't know that
- or they do
but expect it from their disposable servant class?

From http://www.anesi.com/titanic.htm
Men die for women. We love women more than our lives.

But we do not love all women - we love the women who deserve our love.

Your claim that we must worship all women - and get nothing in return - is just madness, and abusive madness at that, and we do not and will not do your will, and you are welcome to leave our society and our company, and form your own in the company of your toxic Sisterhood

- and the only response from us will be a collective round of applause.

Sunday, 9 August 2015

Australian Government says it wants Social Justice for 'all' rape victims!

If you are man subject to domestic violence in australia, you can get help on this website... https://www.1800respect.org.au/get-help/

Because violence against women is unacceptable!
Errr... wait...

Just against women?

This is equivalent to having it say violence against straight people, or white people, or tall people... why narrow it down just to women, it takes MORE effort to do that than to just say "domestic violence is wrong".

So you try to get help...

https://www.1800respect.org.au/common-questions/who-can-i-talk-to-about-domestic-family-violence-or-sexual-assault/new-south-wales-counselling-services/

and it directs you to

"Women’s Health Centres

These regional services can also provide information and referrals for women who have experienced domestic and family violence or sexual abuse and assault.  "

Yup. It's pretty clear they aren't going to help you if you're male.

It also points to http://www.rape-dvservices.org.au/ who says:

"The organisation also provides counselling for women who experienced sexual assault in childhood from a number of Women’s Health Centres across NSW. "

So here's a question. Say you were born a girl, and were raped. You would get help. But say you were transgender... on the day you transitioned, you would be thrown out, no support, regarded as a victimiser automatically.

"Rape & Domestic Violence Services Australia is committed to upholding the rights of all people to live in a socially just, equitable and non violent society."

Social 'Justice'? So long as you're not male, of course.






Sunday, 2 August 2015

ANZ Australia announces it will now pay men less for the same work than women


- and the Australian Gov't approves!


http://isurvived.org/Pictures_iSurvived-2/Hungarian-jews_BW.GIF
https://archive.is/UUUKD
In each case (except in New South Wales), the legislation allows “special measures” to be taken and states that such measures do not constitute unlawful discrimination.

Huh. So justice for all - except the people the commissioners don't like?

https://stevenglassman.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/auschwitz-9.jpg

In essence, ANZ considers that paying extra superannuation contributions to female employees constitutes a special measure under the relevant legislation.

Like not paying Jews an equal salary would be. Oh sorry, I mean Jewish MEN. Discriminating against them is fine. And Aboriginal MEN. And gay MEN.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a0/In_memory_of_homosexual.JPG

In fact, I have to wonder who is protected from discrimination under this law?

Oh right - anyone not a MAN.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/Stroop_Report_-_Warsaw_Ghetto_Uprising_06b.jpg
Everyone was equal under the law in Nazi Germany, except, of course, for those for whom “special measures” applied.

ANZ also consulted with the Australian Human Rights Commission, which advised that in its view ANZ’s initiative “addressed an inequality in retirement savings between male and female employees” and was “consistent with the objects of the Sex Discrimination Act”.

Hmm. Aboriginals have less savings than white people. Should white people be paid less? Asians have more savings. Should they be paid less?

I look forward to an announcement by ANZ that Asian workers will now be docked wages because they work too damned hard.

Initially the German government passed laws to exclude Jews from civil society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust
The Holocaust wasn't built in a day. The gas ovens were built brick by bloody brick, with little acts of discrimination masking the hatred underneath.

http://www.thevoiceleuven.be/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Adesoji-2.jpg

You can even force your victims to build the machinery of their execution, after a while.

Work - "The Wheelbarrow Kommando", drawing by Henri Gayot. (source)




The fact that the Australian Government approves of this galls me the most - and let's make it clear, this is occurring in a supposedly conservative government!



Continued in:

Men are not regarded as 'Human' thanks to Feminist legislation in Australia

On the Web:



http://archive.is/OmCWJ

archived from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:SCispHN2QQkJ:www.brainlabsdigital.com/pay-gap/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

31 May 2016 03:25:34 UTC


as they had censored the original to try and hide their fuckery. c.f. http://www.brainlabsdigital.com/pay-gap/ for the 'corrected' version.




http://bransrath.tumblr.com/post/114991047036/the-us-gender-wage-gap-is-a-myth


http://problematicparrot.tumblr.com/post/113960611111/debunking-feminist-myths-the-gender-pay-gap-if

More Sources:

  1. http://www.businessinsider.com/actually-the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-a-myth-2011-3
  2. http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2015/07/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-myth/
  3. http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-wage-gap-myth-that-wont-die-1443654408
  4. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/
  5. http://thefederalist.com/2015/05/06/there-is-no-wage-gap-feminists-want-equal-pay-for-unequal-work/
  6. http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/
  7. http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/feminist-equal-pay-myth-gets-debunked-thoroughly
  8. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/04/14/on-equal-pay-day-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-gender-pay-gap/
  9. http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/05/the-biggest-myth-about-the-gender-wage-gap/276367/
  10. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/harvard-prof.-takes-down-gender-wage-gap-myth/article/2580405
  11. http://watchdog.org/224999/democrats-gender-gap/
  12. http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2015/08/when-women-out-earn-men.html#.Vt4Ke5wrKUk
  13. https://www.aei.org/publication/the-gender-wage-gap-myth/
  14. http://www.marieclaire.com/career-advice/news/a15415/gender-pay-gap-women-outearn-men/
  15. http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds
  16. http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2015/04/gender_wage_gap_women_more_than_men_cities.html
  17. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a-yearly-reminder-that-the-gender-wage-gap-is-due-to-choice-not-discrimination/article/2563010
  18. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/02/01/no-women-don-t-make-less-money-than-men.html
  19. http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/11/27/if-there-really-is-a-gender-pay-gap-then-where-the-heck-is-it/#26d1af5f7c24
  20. http://freakonomics.com/podcast/the-true-story-of-the-gender-pay-gap-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/
  21. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html
  22. http://www.adamsmith.org/news/why-the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-myth-kate-andrews-writes-for-spectator-coffee-house/
  23. http://bigstory.ap.org/article/c167ab467bb5488e854c0a374b57f750/women-are-out-earning-men-corporate-finance
  24. http://www.theage.com.au/comment/pay-gap-due-to-womens-choices-not-gender-bias-20150307-13y5bl.html
  25. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3214854/Pay-gap-Women-earn-men-till-40s-20-woman-paid-men-age-group-decade.html
  26. http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2012/11/05/the_female_wage_gap_is_a_major_economic_myth_99969.html
  27. http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/

Thursday, 9 April 2015

Debunk Feminism

I got a lot of this from the amazing oratorasaurus  as well as other amazing antifeminists. I will add as I go along.

“The Wage Gap”
Domestic Violence
Rape Culture
Mens Issues
Female Privilege
Feminists being horrible

See also:

Debunking 5 common feminists arguments

Friday, 4 April 2014

CDC admits it uses Feminist definitions to impose sexism on it's services.

–]oneiorosgrip 2 points ago


In February of 2013 I sent a Freedom of Information act request to the CDC asking for the raw numbers from 2010 for the various areas of intimate partner and sexual violence, with a specific set of questions.


The CDC took almost a year to reply, sent me a PDF file with copy/paste errors in it that looks very much like it was thrown together at the last minute, and insisted on trying to tell me that it was useless before releasing it to me. Their explanation for why it was supposedly useless didn't address the interest I had in it.


In addition to the errors, there were issues with the information itself. There are areas in which the text makes the claim "The numbers of respondents reporting victimization in other categories not described above were too small to produce a reliable estimate and therefore were not included in the report" about types of victimization for which hundreds were listed reporting in response to other questions.

It's evident that there *were * enough respondents in at least some of those categories, and the CDC or the researchers themselves simply dodged the questions because they did not want to answer them.


It was in part because of that evasiveness that during the conference call, I point blank asked them why they refuse to call forced coitus rape when the victim is male if they're aware that it's rape when the victim is female.

The researcher on the phone literally could not answer the question - she stumbled over it for a few seconds before falling back on "because the experts said so." There was no actual reasoning - just, "because we said so."


We saw the "reasoning" behind Koss's decision to exclude female-on-male rape from the definition of rape. That is where the "expert" definition comes from.

What I got from them was an admission that they've allowed feminists to write sexism into their policy on sexual violence. It didn't even seem to bother them that much to admit it.

source