Male Education reference

http://stoppity.tumblr.com/post/82727407579/bastardlybrendan-sjhetalia

Text in case original source gets closed down:

sjhetalia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VVKyesBzDAs
Meanwhile, on the Girl Scouts own website on Education:

• Female kindergarteners (83%) are somewhat more likely than their male counterparts (79%) to exhibit the following positive social behaviors: ease in joining others in play; ability to make and keep friends; and positively interacting with peers. (ChildTrends.org, Child and Youth Indicators Databank: Kindergartners’ Social Interaction Skills, 2006)
  
• In 2005, female fourth- and eighth-graders both scored higher on average in reading than their male counterparts. (National Center for Education Statistics, The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2005)

• A slightly higher percentage of females than males completed high school in 2005 (87% compared with 85%, respectively). In 2005, females were also more likely than males to have completed some college (62% compared with 52%, respectively) and to have received at least a bachelor’s degree (32% compared with 26%, respectively). (ChildTrends.org, Child and Youth Indicators Databank: Educational Attainment, 2006)

• In 2004, 9% of females ages 16 to 24 were high school dropouts, compared with 12% of males. Females comprise one-half of the population and make up 43% of the dropouts in this age group. (ChildTrends.org,Child and Youth Indicators Databank: High School Dropout Rates, 2006)

• In 2000, sex differences occurred in science course taking but not in mathematics. More females than males completed courses in advanced biology, Advanced Placement (AP) or International Baccalaureate (IB) biology, and chemistry. Males completed physics and AP/IB physics courses at higher rates than females. (National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators, 2006)
  
• In 2000, women earned more than half of the degrees awarded in psychology (78%), biological/agricultural sciences (59%), and social sciences (55%), and almost half (47%) in mathematics. However, women received 21% of bachelors degrees awarded in engineering, 27% in computer sciences, and 43% in physical sciences. (National Science Foundation, Science and Engineering Indicators 2006)
  
• For girls ages 8-12, aspirations after high school are largely educational and professional: 93% for college education; 76% for a career; 67% for marriage; and, 63% for children. (The Girl Scout Research Institute,Teens Before Their Time (2000))

On Civic Engagement and Volunteering:

• For girls ages 11-12, 73% reported improving the world around them as their favorite activity (i.e., activities related to the environment or helping others). (The Girl Scout Research Institute, The Ten Emerging Truths: New Directions for Girls 11-17 (2002))
  
• Girls ages 11-17 participate in student government at markedly increasing levels: 5% of girls ages 11-13; 12% of girls ages 13-15; and 20% of girls ages 16-17. (The Girl Scout Research Institute, The Ten Emerging Truths: New Directions for Girls 11-17 (2002))
  
• More young women aged 15 to 25 participate in the following activities than young men: raising money for charity (27% for women vs. 22% for men); regular volunteering for non-political groups (21% vs. 16%); active group membership (22% vs. 18%); membership in political groups (17% vs. 15%); and, participating in a run/walk/ride for charity (20% vs. 15%). (Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, The Civic and Political Health of a Nation, 2006)

• In the 2004 election, 55% of females ages 18-24 reported registering to vote, compared with 48% of males the same age. Similarly, 45% of females reported actually voting, compared with 39% of males. (ChildTrends.org, Child and Youth Indicators Databank: Youth Voting, 2006)

• From 1990 to 2000, consistent young volunteers were more likely to be female (14 percent) than male (11 percent). They were also more likely to be from higher SES households. (National Center for Education Statistics, Volunteer Service by Young People from High School through Early Adulthood, 2003)
  
• From 1990 to 2000, females (50%) were more likely than males (38%) to volunteer in high school, but no differences were detected between the sexes two years out of high school (38% for males and 39% for females). Male volunteering declined further to 29% by the eighth year after scheduled high school graduation; no change was detected in female volunteering (37%). (National Center for Education Statistics, Volunteer Service by Young People from High School through Early Adulthood, 2003)
  
• As of 2003, female college graduates were more likely than their male counterparts to have volunteered in the past year (50% vs. 43%). Among those who had volunteered, women were more likely than men to have served in educational or religious institutions, while men were more likely than women to have done other volunteer work with children or to have participated in poverty or neighborhood improvement projects. (National Center for Education Statistics, Where Are They Now? A Description of 1992–93 Bachelor’s Degree Recipients 10 Years Later, 2006)
  
• College students follow the national trend in volunteering, with females (33%) volunteering at a higher rate than males (26.8%). Both male and female college students were more likely to volunteer for an educational or youth services organization than any other type of organization: 33.6% of male college students, and 30.2% of female college students volunteered at an educational or youth services organization. With a little over 22% of both male and female college students, religious organizations remained the second most popular place for volunteering among both genders. (Corporation for National and Community Service, College Students Helping America, 2006)

I left out few points on the education section simply because the only thing it showed is that girls and boys have different interests they excel at.

A Norwegian documentary called The Gender Equality Paradox proves that this is not socially enforced but rather because the minds of boys and girls are different it is natural for girls and boys to have separate interests and abilities.

Female teachers have been shown to grade down boys, unless they act like the girls.

~Mod Prussia

Feminist hates men because they know she hates men.

A reaction to https://archive.is/6LiLp

12 May 2016 20:09:29 UTC

archived from http://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/features/a20338/dating-while-black-and-feminist/



"Do you just...hate men?"

Total shot in the dark, but I'm going to say... yes.

I love the fact she never actually denies that. She's just mad he's allowed to ask the question.



"It was not the first time a man had asked me this question."



Yet men don't ask other women that question. Perhaps some alarm bells should be ringing? Some self-examination might be in order? No, of course not! Logic is for the enemy!



 "despite the fact that I'm not one to ever be silenced—especially by such a cheap, clichéd trick"



 There's no trick. It's a straight question that men keep asking you and you keep deflecting away from. You seem to be giving men the impression you hate them. I can see why.









"My partner, who'd asked me to teach him more about why women need safe spaces, was the one derailing the conversation."

No dissent past this point. Free thoughts will be confiscated!

You consider having your partner raise the worry that you hate him... derailling? You had something more important to talk about while watching TV?



WHAT THE FUCK WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THAT?




 "During sacred Netflix and Chill time."



 Ok, I don't know if you hate men, but we sure as fuck hate you now. Your partner was reaching out to you with an incredibly important question - the one that would determine whether or not you have a future - and you want to focus on the TV instead.



 Fuck. You.


"Talk about fragile masculinity."



Oh yes, it's a sign of how fragile masculinity is that we have feelings other than lust and anger. That we care if our partners love us.

Feminists love to claim men are emotional cripples who can't express their feelings
- then despise them when they express their feelings

What. A. Bitch.






""In this patriarchal society, women are socialized to coddle male egos and not to ask 'too much' of men or risk losing everything "



Women - in all 'patriarchal' societies - ask men to DIE for them - and most men go and do it.



Jesus bloody Christ. If you don't want to "coddle male egos" - i.e. have a supportive relationship - then don't. No-one is forcing you to.

Piss off with your sisterhood and you can bitch together about how periods are caused by Patriarchy - we don't care.







" Do they get that our society is so deeply invested in preserving patriarchy that groups of old white men throughout the country"

From http://s20.photobucket.com/user/dtomchay/media/HLHBnl9.jpg.html

Raaah! (*cut to scenes of hordes of old white men rampaging through the city streets*)





 "are succeeding at stripping women of their legal rights "



 Citation needed. Name one right men have that women do not. I know of many women have that men do not.




" in the year 2016?"



Oh no! It's [current year]. How come I don't have everything I want when it's [current year]?



" While some men may think Black women making $0.64 to the dollar of what men make isn't fair"

No, it's a crime.  Men made it a crime. You are lying.


" who's ready to chip in that $.36 to even it out?"

We are willing to trade higher total earnings for you dying at eleven times the rate - which is what we do to get those big bucks, the extra money comes from the harder jobs that you avoid.

But I noticed you also ignore the fact that ethnically asian people earn way more than you do. Maybe it's because they work hard and get degrees that will give them good incomes instead of bloody Social Justice degrees?



"who's actually interested in doing the hard, long work of decolonizing heteronormative relationships? "

You think heterosexuality is abnormal, despite the massive amount of evidence against you? So why write this shit-piece whining about heterosexual relationships if you don't think being heterosexual is normal? Go have sex with your cat or something - we don't care so long as you don't keep us awake at night!


"Who is ready to decolonize the world?"

Feminists, apparently. Not going to be a lot of people if you get rid of heterosexual relationships.



"Because toxic masculinity isn't just unfair, or annoying, or detrimental—it kills women."

Citation needed. Most deaths from violence are of men. But lets imagine that men really are these horrible monsters of the Feminist imagination.

Grr! Argh!

...

YOU JUST WROTE AN ARTICLE ON HOW ANGRY YOU WERE THAT YOUR LOVER ASKED YOU IF YOU HATED MEN - AND IN THE ARTICLE YOU EXPLAIN... THAT MEN ARE MONSTERS.

If we are monsters, then (do i really need to spell this out?)


then indeed you fucking do hate men. Your lover was right, and your every word is a lie not only to the reader but to yourself.

"The leading cause of death for Black women and girls ages 15-35 is domestic violence or intimate partner violence. "

Citation needed. Lesbian DV rates are higher, so if anything all you are pointing out is that modern women are living very safe lives.


"Black women suffer the highest rates of intraracial violence."

Citation needed. White people suffer from violence from back people in the US far more than vice versa, so I'm not sure if you really want to play that card.


"And it starts in small, seemingly innocuous ways, like sitting on a panel and whining about its lack of inclusion instead of giving your seat to a qualified woman of color who could do it better anyway."

Citation needed. One of the reasons we don't just give jobs away according to your privilege point system is because the person who can do it better is the one who competes for the fucking job. Just giving a job to someone because you think they have the 'right' skin colour is what other countries have done, yes.



So that's what you want to build? Why not head off to Zimbabwe - plenty of fellow believers in that racist bullshit over there!

This is what happens when the ideologues give out jobs to the 'right' people,

not the people who earn the position the hard way. (source)

"It's denying you're a misogynist because you "don't hate women," without realizing that thinking women deserve less than you isn't love."

Nor would it be hate, you stupid twat, even by your own logic. I don't hate bugs or trees or goldfish but I do see them as lesser beings.

Even if your partner did think that your life was less important than his - fucking unlikely, I know which of you is more likely to die for the other if shit goes down - that wouldn't mean he hated you. and you haven't advanced one whit of evidence that he saw you as a lesser being.

Three young men, each in different parts of theater nine, who gave their lives to protect their girlfriends. (source)

Moodley was stabbed at about 8.30pm at the Fordsburg Square flea market
after shopping with Jagar on Saturday, April 26 as he tried to defend his future wife. (source)

Men give their lives to put women first
- and I have to wonder is it that Feminists don't know that
- or they do
but expect it from their disposable servant class?

From http://www.anesi.com/titanic.htm

Men die for women. We love women more than our lives.

But we do not love all women - we love the women who deserve our love.

Your claim that we must worship all women - and get nothing in return - is just madness, and abusive madness at that, and we do not and will not do your will, and you are welcome to leave our society and our company, and form your own in the company of your toxic Sisterhood

- and the only response from us will be a collective round of applause.

Review of Solusek's Eye in Everquest 2

You like steering, right?

For hours? In a game? Where if you make any mistakes, you have to start again?

And none of it makes sense? Why are there these walkways without railings? That giants who can't fly walk up and down? Don't they worry about the fall? It's not marshmallow down there!

And there's no sense either - why make everything twisted, it's more work and less safe?


Of course, the answer is - from a game dev perspective - that you want to slow down the players. You ration out the fun. If it takes ten hours of mindless trudging and occasional deaths - that's ten hours of content you don't have to create.

And they have to do it for each character. This quest is pretty much essential - there's a slight shortcut, but mostly you are just going to have to bite it and do it and afterwards you can relax and close down Everquest 2 and wonder if there is anything better you can play in future.

There's a way around it - level up a character in a second account - and people do this solely for this purpose. The character has a summoning ability. Their existence in the game is solely to summon other characters to the end of that awful run.

And the game devs never closed that loophole, despite the fact that second accounts like that cost them money.

So here's my advice - find which character class it is that can do this, make them of the race that can teleport to where someone else stands, and level that character up to the point they can port someone else. After that point, they can stand forever at the end point and never be used for anything else.

Yay?

Be a Man. Get Married. Make Women Rich. Die.

A reaction to https://youtu.be/EtvfHnZMcOY

" is it possible that married men have more sex and make more money than their single counterparts"

In 1992, John Cleese married American
psychotherapist,
Alyce Faye Eichelberger,
but the pair went on to divorce in 2008
- a move that cost him £12million of his fortune
(source)

No, because marriage - as in the case of John Cleese - has a built-in financial incentive for women to end it.

A man and a woman are married, divorced, and she ends up with more than half his assets - for no other reason than her sex?

Why?

And in the US, marriage can result in a man going to jail because he can't pay his wife - not based in actual earnings, but what the judge imagines he might be able to earn hypothetically.

Once he has gone to jail, his ability to attain employment is permanently impaired. He will still be sent back to jail over and over if he can't make the payments he can't possibly afford to make.

"Married men are motivated to maximize their income."

Absolutely - by doing jobs that result in their deaths at eleven times the rate of women. They pay with their lives, so that their ex-wives will benefit. Yay?

"They work more hours", leading to more injuries, disability and earlier death. It also results in a gender wage gap, which is seen as being a problem.

In Australia, feminists solved that one by paying men less per hour for the same work. Yay?

In Sweden, they want a "man tax" - in addition to all the extra taxes men pay for working the extra time already - so that men will have to subsidise women who will need to work less and less as a result.

"Men have some kind of willy bonus in that they earn 10% to 20% more"

Feminists will often repeat variations of this - yet they never seem to be able to point out which companies are breaking the law by doing this, or explain why companies would want to decrease profits by hiring men when they can get an all woman workforce to do the same job for less money.

In effect, men are becoming a worker caste whilst women can become the idle rich, the parasite class carried by the men they despise.

Yay?

" after marrying at 19 and having kids, Taulbee’s perspective changed"

Yup. Being a father is important - and you are conflating parenthood and marriage. Kinda funny because he can kiss those kids goodbye when she leaves him.


"Taulbee quit his factory job and joined the Army, where he made significantly more money and received housing and health care paid for by the military."

Interesting tactic to push there - we men should sign up and risk death. Women don't have to, of course. No push here for women to risk their lives.

Marriage is about benefiting women and persuading men that they won't be loved without it. But the divorce rate proves they certainly won't be loved with it - that all it does is incentivise their destruction.

You say we aren't MEN unless we join up? You'll give us the White Feather unless we sign?

Haha, stuff you! We ain't falling for that trick again, bitches!

---

Further reading

Estranged wife of soldier who was awarded £1.1million when Taliban bomb left him severely brain damaged 'wants his last £200,000' after she walked out on him on Valentine's Day (source)

Wage gap links

Hope they all still work!

1. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/
2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250672504707048.html
3. http://money.howstuffworks.com/gender-gap1.htm
4. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-13/don-t-blame-discrimination-for-gender-wage-gap.html
5. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/davidgreen/9666597/The_gender_pay_gap_does_not_exist/
6. http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf
7. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/
8. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-gender-wage-gap-is-a-myth-2012-07-26
9. http://www.businessinsider.com/actually-the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-a-myth-2011-3?op=1
10. http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/41131660349/the-so-called-pay-gap
11. http://tgjesusfreak.tumblr.com/post/59991585178
12. http://wwww.examiner.com/x-22884-Canada-Politics-Examiner~y2010m2d22-Gender-pay-gap-is-not-what-activists-claim
13. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/vickiwoods/7957186/Sorry-ladies-Im-not-worried-about-wage-gaps.html
14. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/opinion/22Sommers.html?_r=1&hp
15. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/09/the_wage_gap_myth.html
16. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa3pKN3XUKM&feature=youtu.be
17. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/economy/06women.html?_r=2
18. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/biggest-shock-fridays-payroll-report-sorry-men
19. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/07/share-of-men-in-labor-force-at-all-time-low/?src=recg
20. http://www.businessinsider.com/women-in-tech-make-more-money-and-land-better-jobs-than-men-20
21. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedType=R
22. http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=10630664
23. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
24. http://www.ksee24.com/news/local/Young-Women-Earn-More-159818705.html
25. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html
26. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/03/14/jobs-where-women-earn-more-than-men/
27. http://www.womenintechnology.co.uk/news/young-women-earn-more-than-men%E2%80%94news-800761492
28. http://www.womensviewsonnews.org/2011/10/young-women-now-earn-more-than-men-in-uk/
29. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedTy%E2%80%A6
30. http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/03/15/optout.revolution/
31. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23413243
32. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/Careers/06/13/dads.work/index.html
33. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-04-equal-parenting_N.htm
34. http://www.sify.com/news/women-stay-away-from-math-out-of-their-own-free-choice-news-scitech-kk1lubiiiee.html
35. http://www.science20.com/news_articles/women_science_no_discrimination_says_cornell_study-75984
36. http://www.payscale.com/career-news/2009/12/do-men-or-women-choose-majors-to-maximize-income
37. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html

#NSFW #FreeTheTracerButt!

Tracer is unimpressed with the whole debacle. See if you can pick which classic soft porn image they are referencing here...

My reaction to

OVERWATCH REMOVES TRACER'S BUTT POSE!

If Tracer makes people uncomfortable because she's sexual, I have to wonder about how those people reacted when women were wearing yoga pants - sometimes with very little else - in public.



From what I saw, there were a lot of young women, sometimes maybe 16, who wore those and who clearly did so to attract attention. I was surprised that sometimes the pants were transparent and you

could see the washing instructions on their underwear, which concerned me as I wasn't sure the owner had been following them correctly. I did try and point this out in the lift but I fear she misunderstood my intentions. Anyway, the doctor has said there was only some permanent damage and I just have to avoid contact sports and wear a helmet from here on.

But back to Tracer.

It's interesting that the people objecting to her on the grounds she harms women
never seem to consider that some of the fans of sexy women are
(dramatic music)
.... other women!

I adore the artist who creates the pin-ups on the right.

I made a mistake with a mod in Fallout 4 and it wiped
all the artwork by that man from my settlements.

So many hours work undone (*cries inconsolably*)

If Tracer is bad because she's sexual, then the orthodox Jews, the Islamists etc have just as much right to look at any computer game where a woman's arms are uncovered and scream *"you are making me uncomfortable, you filthy slut"*, presumably whilst waggling a long bony arm in disgust, and the developer should, under their pressure, fold like a soaking wet cardboard box being abused by a cat.

From http://imgur.com/iciaOWH

Of course, religious groups mostly don't have that power in the West. Censorship is largely frowned on.

Good grief, she's cute. Can I skip this article and just spend my life crushing on her adorableness?

Mostly.

One group is State backed. One group can get books burnt and games pulled from shelves, one group can push a man to tears on the best day of his life because he was wearing a shirt made by his lovely friend that they didn't like because it showed women that were prettier than they were.



One group that has the power to teach, in schools, that heterosexuality is not normal, and that tiny children should be given hormones to change their biology permanently and sometimes fatally.

One group that calls for special improved public transport - but only for their group - and the others can ride the dregs left over.

One group. Starts with a F. Ends in an -ism. Pretty much like the other group we fought and defeated all those years ago.

Tracer don' care! She busy!

Can you guess the name?

---

Further Thoughts:

It's interesting that there are so many women who are happy to play characters Feminists feel are demeaning. Perhaps what Feminists really feel is jealousy?

Note: She is doing the 'boob-butt' pose that drives feminists berserk - that they claim is impossible for real women to do.

I play to win! GG! D.Va Cosplay

https://cosplayheaven69.tumblr.com/post/144888322600/cosplayers-spcats-team-country-south-korea

Feminists to outlaw "looking" and "commenting" by men as sexcrime.

In fact, one of the way humans reproduced was that they spoke to each other, even when they did not know each other beforehand. This would now be classed as harassment, of course, and should be punishable with severe penalties for any male found doing it, or, if two women are involved, any male found being near by when it happens.

Stop looking at her with your lust,
you rapist!

Here we have a Feminist dealing with men in the approved fashion,
by killing them as the cockroaches that they are.

A reply to

"We want men to stop"


https://theconversation.com/we-want-men-to-stop-honking-their-horn-at-women-because-they-respect-them-not-for-fear-of-punishment-57337

5 May 2016 10:16:30 UTC

(It's been interesting that this street harassment is defined so broadly that any human interaction can be counted. I remember how harassment used to be defined, and that one of the key words was that it was repeated after the person said "no".)

Looking or commenting about these strong and empowered wimmin
is further proof that all men hate all womyn of colour.

The removal of men's eyes and tongues should be mandatory
to prevent more brave and stunning wymyn
from suffering from their gaze.

Let's define our terms.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/harassment

" the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands."

Extending that to comments like "hello" and acts like "looking longer than an undefined length of time" is a sign of how brave and empowered strong wimmin of colour have become that they no longer need to worry about "speaking English" or "being sensible".


Having solved the problem of harassment by imprisoning all the males, the next level of approach would be their gentle and harmless extermination, followed by a cleansing incineration and burial.

However, the problem of how to continue funding into harassment continues. Since women cannot, by definition, be responsible for harm - that's the basis of the Duluth Model, after all - the logical solution is, of course, to simply re-designate some of the women as men.

Then they can be blamed for such crimes as "glancing" and "commenting".


Whilst some misogynists might argue that this will result in human extinction, and other white men might mansplain to us beautiful strong and empowered femmes that this wouldn't result in anything but the destruction of Western civilisation at the hands of some "sane" culture (which is ableist, racist and transphobic as well), we all know that utopia is the only possible result.

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp
with a high-heel shoved in his mouth,
like an apple in the mouth of a pig."

We have Listened and Believed. All praise the word of Dworkin!

---

"Bianca Fileborn receives funding from La Trobe University to undertake research on street harassment."

So it's not like she's going to find anything but the need for more funding. The fact that the many street cameras/phones etc don't show any evidence of the 'epidemic' is just proof of how nasty men are - they turn invisible whenever they attack a strong and empowered wymyn of colour.

"Victoria State Government provides funding as a strategic partner of The Conversation AU"

So this is taxpayer funding being used to create new laws that will imprison men who look at or speak to their 'betters' - women.

FUCK OFF, YOU CUNTS.

And I say that with all due respect.

---

Further Reading:

Cat Calling:

Male Gaze: