A reply to Philip DeFranco

I am superior to you because I don't do sexy shoots

So what did Emma say that makes her seem hypocritical?

"Do as I say, not as I do"

I find this whole thing about being 18 and everyone expecting me to be this object..I find the whole concept of being 'sexy' embarrassing and confusing.

Personally, I don't actually think it's even that sexy. What's sexy about saying, 'I'm here with my boobs out and a short skirt...have a look at everything I've got'? My idea of sexy is that less is more. The less you reveal the more people can wonder.

https://archive.is/IJtp2

archived from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/4421737/Emma-Watson-describes-her-concept-of-sexiness.html

6 Mar 2017 12:43:18 UTC

I am superior to you
because I can do this
then
criticise you for doing this

“As I was watching [the videos] I felt very conflicted, I felt her message felt very conflicted in the sense that on the one hand she is putting herself in a category of a feminist, but then the camera, it felt very male, such a male voyeuristic experience of her and I just wondered if you had thoughts about that or if you had any of your own thoughts about any of it really …”(source)

Emma Watson, making it clear that Beyonce's body is not her choice; Feminists will sanctimoniously decide for women what they may do - they are the new puritans, but an especially hypocritical variety.



The trouble is, "Classical Feminism" never existed - what you are describing is egalitarianism.

When Dworkin et al took over the teaching of Feminism at universities, and shaped the leadership of Feminism, then they determined how the movement was defined. It's exactly the same as Communism.

Young Communists will often argue that Lenin, Stalin, Mao etc etc are all irrelevant, because the bulk of communists were really, really nice. But they didn't oppose the authoritarian policies, and as we see in America, are very content with opposing liberal ideals such as Free Speech.

Feminists, as a group, campaign against businesses such as newspapers and Hooters, that use female sexuality - they call it objectification. But the businesses do not force women to work for them. Is it not "their body, their choice"?

Emma: Feminism is about choice!

Feminism: We will decide your choices for you.

It's not technically the first time she's done topless modelling,

but it is interesting that what she was wearing in her recent shoot
would be banned for strippers in some US States

And you can say "oh, they are just the radicals", but where are all the nice feminists protecting those women's choices? When feminists jump onto runways to attack models because they feel modelling is objectification, there's no condemnation of it by Feminist leaders.


One of the things that surprised me when I learnt Modern History was that most Nazis were nice. They had no idea they were bad people, they didn't do violence themselves, they were good folks... but they didn't oppose the ones who were doing the horrors, because their leadership said things that made them feel good.

It's the same with Feminism. Feminists don't oppose organisations like NOW, they don't speak up when #HeForShe says that men must learn to serve women, they just want their feelgood fix and if that hurts men and women ... so be it.

Objectification: It's fine when she does it.

Emma's true self finally revealed!

Further Reading:

The "No More Page 3" Campaign. https://archive.is/PiSkf

Hooters objectifies women? https://archive.is/fF8FW 3 Mar 2017 02:03:05 UTC



Feminists are body-shaming ME', claims model who was savaged
after starring in 'Are You Beach Body Ready?' ad

'That b**** ruined my walk!': Model explains why she PUNCHED topless feminist protester who stormed Paris Fashion Week

Feminists point out that no, feminism is not about choice

Maybe the whole thing was just trolling?

Excerpt from Battle of the boobs:

"The No More Page 3 campaign called for the banning of boobs from the pages of tabloid newspapers like the Sun, because, it claimed, pictures of topless women have no place in print media.



However, the official campaign’s Facebook page celebrated Watson’s shoot, sharing an article that said ‘Emma Watson’s boobs prove we still need feminism’.

Feminists can’t seem to make up their minds: are women publicly baring their boobs good feminists, or bad women?"

"If equality means treating women as badly as men, I want no part of it"

Female soldier, liberating women from ISIS
while Feminists focus on manspreading by tired men on trains.

Who does more for women?

(source)

(source)

A reaction to http://www.sheknows.com/living/articles/1120821/drafting-women

"If equality means sending my daughters to war, I want no part of it"

You want no part of equality? Strangely enough, neither do most of your enemies. The weird thing is, some of those - also - draft women for war.

So I'm not sure how you are going to impose this weird female supremacism since undermining America will only likely lead to you being in one of those systems instead.

"Though our nation hasn't had a draft since the 1970s, selective service registration remains a reality for young men. I admit that, as a mom to two young girls, the draft is not something I have ever given much thought to."

So you didn't care about equality until it turned out equality meant your daughters could die like your sons would.

(source)

That's called Selective Sociopathy. You have lost the ability to feel empathy for men.

Half of your soul has died.

"But here’s the thing about equality: Men and women are not equal."

Then equality is a foolish goal, and Feminism should give up.

"sending women off to war does not present an equal opportunity to women by nature of the fact that women are physically different from men"

It doesn't take a lot of strength to be a pilot, and
women might even be better suited to the role
because being small is an advantage

You think war is an opportunity? Do you not hear your own words? This is about obligations.

We men are obliged to defend our country. Why aren't you women?

(source)

Are you saying you are too weak to pick up a gun? It's funny that women in other countries manage it.

Oh, is it just feminist women who are too feeble?

Fair enough.

Then if they are too pathetic for that job,
then banning them from other physical work
becomes completely reasonable. You can't have it both ways.

But here's the thing: weak men get drafted.

(source)

And a lot of combat has no physical component now. Drones, for example. Or mine clearing.

Tell me why women cannot clear mines? That only men's lives should be sacrificed?

Because that's what it's really about, to Feminists.
#HeForShe.

Men should die so women don't have to.

Even some muslim countries are looking into
gender-neutral conscription. (source)

You see women's lives as more valuable than men's.

You hate equality, and love supremacy.

The Feminist response:

@HTRCADE @Bayonethics We'll laugh when they draft Women during a World War & American population declines due to war + low birth rates! 🇺🇸

— GirlsLikeUs (@FemalesLikeUs) June 16, 2016

@FemalesLikeUs You think women will be safe at home during WW3? I admire your optimism! #FeminismIsCancer

— brett caton (@bcaton2) June 16, 2016

Screenshot in case of deletion.

A woman, 'safe' at home, in Tokyo.
Charred to ash, with what could be her child dead beside her.

Slain by conventional weaponry.

No-one is safe during a war big enough to mean conscription for men.
At least arming women would mean they could shoot at their enemy.

Wikimedia Commons: Koyo Ishikawa

I found this discussion of the Feminist response to possible gender neutral conscription in Tumblr. The screenshots are very revealing of what Feminists really think of equality.

http://kamiyu910.tumblr.com/post/146034426688/ive-been-reading-tweets-and-stuff-about-the

Also, if you need further evidence that this is a mainstream Feminist position, see:
We Already Draft Women In Times Of War, which argues that women should be protected from dangers and kept safe inside because their wombs make them too precious to risk - ironically, the same argument that Islamists use, and that used to be condemned... by Feminists.

My counter-argument is:

a) where the hell is the safety in keeping them at home, when bombs, missiles, and bullets cut down civilians routinely in any big war, and the only reason they aren't killing Americans is there's been no big wars since WW2, and Vietnam - the last war of conscription - was a demonstration of the failure of conscription for anything less than a big war

b) this would only protect women with viable wombs anyway - who, if conscription applies, would be forced to reproduce, which is something not even the Nazis did - conscription forces men to fight and die, after all; force, not choice, is the whole point of it

c) Realistically, if the war is so terrible that unforced human reproduction wouldn't replace the numbers, then you are fucked anyway because some other party will waltz in and take over - humans take decades to reproduce, and it takes hours or days to land troops - the author has no fucking idea how militaries work!

---

See Also:

Apranik (source)

"Female emperors ruled over the many dynasties of the Persian Empire. Many ancient Persian cities and states were ruled by women and had their army totally under control of female commanders.


Women in Persia were very honored and revered; they often had important positions in the Courthouse, Ministries, Military, State and Treasury Department, and other official administrations. Women were treated like Goddesses esteemed as mothers of creation before the barbaric invasion upon Persia. " (source)

Note:

I haven't seen confirmation of these claims outside Feminist websites. Feel free to cite sources to the contrary in the comments.

However.

If this is true... how the Hell can it be reconciled with the Feminist dogma that Patriarchy was oppressing women for all time in all places? That Feminism was needed to save women?


Why were Feminists opposed to the ERA? Conscription!

Feminist professor ties to weasel her way out of the draft.

Feminist hates men because they know she hates men.

A reaction to https://archive.is/6LiLp

12 May 2016 20:09:29 UTC

archived from http://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/features/a20338/dating-while-black-and-feminist/



"Do you just...hate men?"

Total shot in the dark, but I'm going to say... yes.

I love the fact she never actually denies that. She's just mad he's allowed to ask the question.



"It was not the first time a man had asked me this question."



Yet men don't ask other women that question. Perhaps some alarm bells should be ringing? Some self-examination might be in order? No, of course not! Logic is for the enemy!



 "despite the fact that I'm not one to ever be silenced—especially by such a cheap, clichéd trick"



 There's no trick. It's a straight question that men keep asking you and you keep deflecting away from. You seem to be giving men the impression you hate them. I can see why.









"My partner, who'd asked me to teach him more about why women need safe spaces, was the one derailing the conversation."

No dissent past this point. Free thoughts will be confiscated!

You consider having your partner raise the worry that you hate him... derailling? You had something more important to talk about while watching TV?



WHAT THE FUCK WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THAT?




 "During sacred Netflix and Chill time."



 Ok, I don't know if you hate men, but we sure as fuck hate you now. Your partner was reaching out to you with an incredibly important question - the one that would determine whether or not you have a future - and you want to focus on the TV instead.



 Fuck. You.


"Talk about fragile masculinity."



Oh yes, it's a sign of how fragile masculinity is that we have feelings other than lust and anger. That we care if our partners love us.

Feminists love to claim men are emotional cripples who can't express their feelings
- then despise them when they express their feelings

What. A. Bitch.






""In this patriarchal society, women are socialized to coddle male egos and not to ask 'too much' of men or risk losing everything "



Women - in all 'patriarchal' societies - ask men to DIE for them - and most men go and do it.



Jesus bloody Christ. If you don't want to "coddle male egos" - i.e. have a supportive relationship - then don't. No-one is forcing you to.

Piss off with your sisterhood and you can bitch together about how periods are caused by Patriarchy - we don't care.







" Do they get that our society is so deeply invested in preserving patriarchy that groups of old white men throughout the country"

From http://s20.photobucket.com/user/dtomchay/media/HLHBnl9.jpg.html

Raaah! (*cut to scenes of hordes of old white men rampaging through the city streets*)





 "are succeeding at stripping women of their legal rights "



 Citation needed. Name one right men have that women do not. I know of many women have that men do not.




" in the year 2016?"



Oh no! It's [current year]. How come I don't have everything I want when it's [current year]?



" While some men may think Black women making $0.64 to the dollar of what men make isn't fair"

No, it's a crime.  Men made it a crime. You are lying.


" who's ready to chip in that $.36 to even it out?"

We are willing to trade higher total earnings for you dying at eleven times the rate - which is what we do to get those big bucks, the extra money comes from the harder jobs that you avoid.

But I noticed you also ignore the fact that ethnically asian people earn way more than you do. Maybe it's because they work hard and get degrees that will give them good incomes instead of bloody Social Justice degrees?



"who's actually interested in doing the hard, long work of decolonizing heteronormative relationships? "

You think heterosexuality is abnormal, despite the massive amount of evidence against you? So why write this shit-piece whining about heterosexual relationships if you don't think being heterosexual is normal? Go have sex with your cat or something - we don't care so long as you don't keep us awake at night!


"Who is ready to decolonize the world?"

Feminists, apparently. Not going to be a lot of people if you get rid of heterosexual relationships.



"Because toxic masculinity isn't just unfair, or annoying, or detrimental—it kills women."

Citation needed. Most deaths from violence are of men. But lets imagine that men really are these horrible monsters of the Feminist imagination.

Grr! Argh!

...

YOU JUST WROTE AN ARTICLE ON HOW ANGRY YOU WERE THAT YOUR LOVER ASKED YOU IF YOU HATED MEN - AND IN THE ARTICLE YOU EXPLAIN... THAT MEN ARE MONSTERS.

If we are monsters, then (do i really need to spell this out?)


then indeed you fucking do hate men. Your lover was right, and your every word is a lie not only to the reader but to yourself.

"The leading cause of death for Black women and girls ages 15-35 is domestic violence or intimate partner violence. "

Citation needed. Lesbian DV rates are higher, so if anything all you are pointing out is that modern women are living very safe lives.


"Black women suffer the highest rates of intraracial violence."

Citation needed. White people suffer from violence from back people in the US far more than vice versa, so I'm not sure if you really want to play that card.


"And it starts in small, seemingly innocuous ways, like sitting on a panel and whining about its lack of inclusion instead of giving your seat to a qualified woman of color who could do it better anyway."

Citation needed. One of the reasons we don't just give jobs away according to your privilege point system is because the person who can do it better is the one who competes for the fucking job. Just giving a job to someone because you think they have the 'right' skin colour is what other countries have done, yes.



So that's what you want to build? Why not head off to Zimbabwe - plenty of fellow believers in that racist bullshit over there!

This is what happens when the ideologues give out jobs to the 'right' people,

not the people who earn the position the hard way. (source)

"It's denying you're a misogynist because you "don't hate women," without realizing that thinking women deserve less than you isn't love."

Nor would it be hate, you stupid twat, even by your own logic. I don't hate bugs or trees or goldfish but I do see them as lesser beings.

Even if your partner did think that your life was less important than his - fucking unlikely, I know which of you is more likely to die for the other if shit goes down - that wouldn't mean he hated you. and you haven't advanced one whit of evidence that he saw you as a lesser being.

Three young men, each in different parts of theater nine, who gave their lives to protect their girlfriends. (source)

Moodley was stabbed at about 8.30pm at the Fordsburg Square flea market
after shopping with Jagar on Saturday, April 26 as he tried to defend his future wife. (source)

Men give their lives to put women first
- and I have to wonder is it that Feminists don't know that
- or they do
but expect it from their disposable servant class?

From http://www.anesi.com/titanic.htm

Men die for women. We love women more than our lives.

But we do not love all women - we love the women who deserve our love.

Your claim that we must worship all women - and get nothing in return - is just madness, and abusive madness at that, and we do not and will not do your will, and you are welcome to leave our society and our company, and form your own in the company of your toxic Sisterhood

- and the only response from us will be a collective round of applause.

Helen Croydon's a bit of a nightmare, isn't she!

Should men exist for the pleasure of women? Helen Croydon shits all over everyone who doesn’t think so, including Christina Hendricks.



Well, I know who I prefer!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/11589761/Sorry-Christina-Hendricks-Ill-never-be-a-yes-wife.htm

"Sorry, Christina Hendricks, I'll never be a yes-wife"

No-one's asking you to be, luvvy, they wanted an equal. But for you, a relationship is all about a man serving your needs. Well, I hope you and your slave are very happy - but i pity any poor fool who gets close to you, because you can legally sabotage the birth control, get preggers, and rip that poor sod off for all he's worth.

The word “compromise” seems to feature highly in people’s relationship rule book."

And if a man was taking the stance you take, you'd denounce him as as anachronistic Patriarch.

"I see it as an anochranistic killjoy"

I see you as a loathesome boil on the bottom of society. Look, darlin', I get it. You hate men. You really, really hate men, the last thing you want to do is make any of them the least bit happy - and as a self-entitled Princess, you expect, nay DEMAND, they make you happy for nothing in return.

Well, that is not a bloody romance, that's servitude, and we aren't having it.

"The last thing I expected was her advice for women to go all Stepford Wives."

The Stepford Wives never compromised, THEY SUBMITTED. THEY HAD NO NEEDS EXCEPT SERVICE. WHICH IS WHAT YOU WANT FROM MEN. DO YOU NOT SEE THE HYPOCRISY? CAN YOU REALLY BE THIS BLIND?

"In the sixties, women could not take out a mortgage or start a business without a male guarantor. "

Which is freakin' irrelevant, historically dubious (there were lots of women in businesses) and totally ignores the fact men went to jail when their wives went into debt.

" a life partnership"
A partnership is something that benefits all parties involved. You cannot grasp the meaning of that word.

" because it enhances our lives "

Our lives.
OUR lives.
OUR LIVES.

PLURAL.

Look. I realise I have been treating you as a peer, and that's just wrong. There's no way you could be this stupid normally. Was it that your mother drank like a fish whilst smoking crack? Was there a brain tumour removed from your skull, with just enough left over for some resemblance of a human personality?

"I was a compromiser before I realised that life without a full-time bloke gives me a double bed to myself, allows me to stay out as late as I want and means I can drink juice from the carton"

The same carton of juice you give to your guests? With your backwash? Look, dental floss, learn how to use it, that crud floating in the glass is not extra fibre.

"If there really is such a thing as domestic bliss, the way to achieve it is not for women to say yes"

Rubbish. The only way for domestic bliss FOR BOTH PARTIES is if there's give and take. You want a slave. Go for it, some blokes are into that. But 99.99999% of male humanity doesn't want to be your disposable f**-toy, and the advice you are trying to shovel onto other women is to treat men like the contents of those panties you can't be bothered changing.

And we aren't going to take it, Sunshine.

See you in Hell.

Feminists plan to cut men’s wages

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/how-to-solve-the-gender-pay-gap-heres-an-idea-cut-mens-wages/article24170883/


I think we'll see this passing into law very soon, particularly if Hillary Clinton gets into power. The Feminist Initiative has said it will introduce male only taxes if it gets into power, and other Feminist political parties are sympathetic to the idea.

Combine that with reducing men's pay, and you'll have an Emma Watson style #HeForShe second class citizen coded into law.





The author completely ignores all the wage gap studies that say men earn more money by working longer and doing dangerous jobs (resulting in ten times the workplace fatalities). Feminists will still need someone to do those jobs.

How will they persuade their worker caste to continue to die for less pay, and higher taxes? How will they stop that caste from leaving the country for greener fields?



Feminists will have to use *force*. At some point, emotional manipulation will be insufficient.



But Feminists are physically weaker than men. Wat do?

Well, exoskeletons and drones might be a leveler. Some Feminists might be persuaded to don them and put their hatred of men into a physical form.



The use of "white knights" as shock troops is no doubt a part of the HeForShe scheme, but at some point males will notice they are killing other males in the name of equality... which might make most of them start to question their servitude, and then you have armed and trained rebels on your hands!

Unless Feminists devise a remote kill switch for their White Knights, I just don't see it happening.

Another solution might be to drug males from early on.


It's suggested that that is what ADHD medication is; however, I simply have seen no proof of this. It is very interesting that such a huge proportion of boys in education have now been declared mentally ill, and requiring a sedative in order to conform.

13.2% of boys have been diagnosed with ADHD. (source)

Doesn't it seem odd that previous generations of boys were able to get through their schooling without being drugged?

Sign up, sign up! Protect der ladeez, woncha, gennulmen?

feministontinder:

#allmencan use international women’s day as an opportunity to make a personal #heforshe commitment to empowering women in the name of gender equality. What’s yours?

“#allmencan use international women’s day as an opportunity to make a personal #heforshe commitment”

You want us to take your White Feather?



To volunteer in your army?




To assume our position as your eunuchs?



Because He is For She.



But She will give nothing to him in return?



That's your idea of equality?



Your movement keeps changing it's tune I noticed.



"We don't need you - please, defend us! We will leave you - won't you work with us?"



How should we react to your emotional manipulation?



https://oirishm.wordpress.com/2015/03/22/heforshe-campaign-reply-i-still-refuse-to-sign/

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2014/09/emma-plugs-new-improved-feminism-now.htmlhttp://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/reply-to-feminist-promoting-heforshe.htmlv

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2014/09/the-emma-attack-debunked.html