Blackface, whiteface and aussieface.

No-one really does blackface nowadays anyway.

Bert Williams. A black man doing blackface. I wonder what he thought of it all?

What is blackface? A caricature used in entertainment. Usually involves singing. Sure, the people are shown as buffoons, but that’s done of every ethnic grouping.

Even to poor kittens, alas. Always being stereotyped.

I’m Australian, and if you want to dress up as a silly caricature of my nation, I don’t care. Knock yourself out.

Preferably with the Adelaide ‘96, a smashing white wine with an lovely afterburn coming and going.



The thing is, it’s only racist if you genuinely believe that certain people are inferior on the basis of race.

Did Tim genuinely believe South Africans looked or acted like that?

Of course not. It’s a joke. It’s funny because it’s in bad taste.

When Snoop Dog does ‘white guy’, no-one gets offended. It’s a joke. We get it. There’s no malice.

Dwyane Wade Dressing as Justin Timberlake for Halloween.

A caricature of a popular celebrity? Oh no! How terrible!

Don’t care. It’s a joke.

This skit is geoblocked here, but it looks funny. Key & Peele In a sketch called "Das Negros" where two Black men are hiding from the Nazis--disguised as white Germans.


Seriously, the way to disempower things like blackface is to do blackface. Or whiteface, or yellowface, or Avatar-blue-face - it doesn’t matter.

By disconnecting the malice from the situation, by desensitising rather than the SocJus super-sensitising process... you change it from something that genuinely hurt people to a quaint reflection of a time that has passed.

When I hear jokes about Australians being convicts, i don’t find them funny, not because they insult my ancestors, but because that lacks wit. Genuinely looking into the absurdity of the time makes for good humour.

This is the sort of thing that was done to my ancestors. They would be put into masks designed to dehumanise them, and not allowed to speak to other prisoners. How that was supposed to make them better human beings I shall never understand.

But it’s funny too - because it is so fucking over the top.

Look at the size of those chains! Push that a bit further, make it caricature, and you have an excellent costume.

Desensitisation is important.

The reason this officer can endure the naked aggression of this woman is because he has had an officer shouting at him. He learned how to cope in a less dangerous situation and can now deal with her without taking his pistol and removing her brain from her skull, like most people would.

He is desensitised.



Here we have desensitisation training for someone afraid of spiders. (source)

Note: this is the exact opposite of how SoJus manages things, with it's trigger warnings and 'microaggressions' and 'safespace'.



And here we have the outcome. The phobia is gone. Until she visits Australia and something that size but venomous and aggressive spots her from across the room and runs her down like... but enough of my childhood...

We don't live in an era where white people are roaming about, looking to lynch a black man for touching a white woman. Black people have no sane reason to fear white people. If anything, in the US, black people should fear black people. Black on black violence is terrible, but it seems largely ignored.

The direction SocJus has taken instead is to make people neurotics, rather than helping them - to create a blind phobia, a fear and hatred of my kind.

The fact that many of them are white men themselves doesn't stop them in the slightest - these masters of doublethink imagine they are the exceptions to their rule, or that by punishing other white people, they eradicate the Original Sin of their birth.



Self-loathing flagellators are nothing new.

Feminist hates men because they know she hates men.

A reaction to https://archive.is/6LiLp

12 May 2016 20:09:29 UTC

archived from http://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/features/a20338/dating-while-black-and-feminist/



"Do you just...hate men?"

Total shot in the dark, but I'm going to say... yes.

I love the fact she never actually denies that. She's just mad he's allowed to ask the question.



"It was not the first time a man had asked me this question."



Yet men don't ask other women that question. Perhaps some alarm bells should be ringing? Some self-examination might be in order? No, of course not! Logic is for the enemy!



 "despite the fact that I'm not one to ever be silenced—especially by such a cheap, clichéd trick"



 There's no trick. It's a straight question that men keep asking you and you keep deflecting away from. You seem to be giving men the impression you hate them. I can see why.









"My partner, who'd asked me to teach him more about why women need safe spaces, was the one derailing the conversation."

No dissent past this point. Free thoughts will be confiscated!

You consider having your partner raise the worry that you hate him... derailling? You had something more important to talk about while watching TV?



WHAT THE FUCK WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THAT?




 "During sacred Netflix and Chill time."



 Ok, I don't know if you hate men, but we sure as fuck hate you now. Your partner was reaching out to you with an incredibly important question - the one that would determine whether or not you have a future - and you want to focus on the TV instead.



 Fuck. You.


"Talk about fragile masculinity."



Oh yes, it's a sign of how fragile masculinity is that we have feelings other than lust and anger. That we care if our partners love us.

Feminists love to claim men are emotional cripples who can't express their feelings
- then despise them when they express their feelings

What. A. Bitch.






""In this patriarchal society, women are socialized to coddle male egos and not to ask 'too much' of men or risk losing everything "



Women - in all 'patriarchal' societies - ask men to DIE for them - and most men go and do it.



Jesus bloody Christ. If you don't want to "coddle male egos" - i.e. have a supportive relationship - then don't. No-one is forcing you to.

Piss off with your sisterhood and you can bitch together about how periods are caused by Patriarchy - we don't care.







" Do they get that our society is so deeply invested in preserving patriarchy that groups of old white men throughout the country"

From http://s20.photobucket.com/user/dtomchay/media/HLHBnl9.jpg.html

Raaah! (*cut to scenes of hordes of old white men rampaging through the city streets*)





 "are succeeding at stripping women of their legal rights "



 Citation needed. Name one right men have that women do not. I know of many women have that men do not.




" in the year 2016?"



Oh no! It's [current year]. How come I don't have everything I want when it's [current year]?



" While some men may think Black women making $0.64 to the dollar of what men make isn't fair"

No, it's a crime.  Men made it a crime. You are lying.


" who's ready to chip in that $.36 to even it out?"

We are willing to trade higher total earnings for you dying at eleven times the rate - which is what we do to get those big bucks, the extra money comes from the harder jobs that you avoid.

But I noticed you also ignore the fact that ethnically asian people earn way more than you do. Maybe it's because they work hard and get degrees that will give them good incomes instead of bloody Social Justice degrees?



"who's actually interested in doing the hard, long work of decolonizing heteronormative relationships? "

You think heterosexuality is abnormal, despite the massive amount of evidence against you? So why write this shit-piece whining about heterosexual relationships if you don't think being heterosexual is normal? Go have sex with your cat or something - we don't care so long as you don't keep us awake at night!


"Who is ready to decolonize the world?"

Feminists, apparently. Not going to be a lot of people if you get rid of heterosexual relationships.



"Because toxic masculinity isn't just unfair, or annoying, or detrimental—it kills women."

Citation needed. Most deaths from violence are of men. But lets imagine that men really are these horrible monsters of the Feminist imagination.

Grr! Argh!

...

YOU JUST WROTE AN ARTICLE ON HOW ANGRY YOU WERE THAT YOUR LOVER ASKED YOU IF YOU HATED MEN - AND IN THE ARTICLE YOU EXPLAIN... THAT MEN ARE MONSTERS.

If we are monsters, then (do i really need to spell this out?)


then indeed you fucking do hate men. Your lover was right, and your every word is a lie not only to the reader but to yourself.

"The leading cause of death for Black women and girls ages 15-35 is domestic violence or intimate partner violence. "

Citation needed. Lesbian DV rates are higher, so if anything all you are pointing out is that modern women are living very safe lives.


"Black women suffer the highest rates of intraracial violence."

Citation needed. White people suffer from violence from back people in the US far more than vice versa, so I'm not sure if you really want to play that card.


"And it starts in small, seemingly innocuous ways, like sitting on a panel and whining about its lack of inclusion instead of giving your seat to a qualified woman of color who could do it better anyway."

Citation needed. One of the reasons we don't just give jobs away according to your privilege point system is because the person who can do it better is the one who competes for the fucking job. Just giving a job to someone because you think they have the 'right' skin colour is what other countries have done, yes.



So that's what you want to build? Why not head off to Zimbabwe - plenty of fellow believers in that racist bullshit over there!

This is what happens when the ideologues give out jobs to the 'right' people,

not the people who earn the position the hard way. (source)

"It's denying you're a misogynist because you "don't hate women," without realizing that thinking women deserve less than you isn't love."

Nor would it be hate, you stupid twat, even by your own logic. I don't hate bugs or trees or goldfish but I do see them as lesser beings.

Even if your partner did think that your life was less important than his - fucking unlikely, I know which of you is more likely to die for the other if shit goes down - that wouldn't mean he hated you. and you haven't advanced one whit of evidence that he saw you as a lesser being.

Three young men, each in different parts of theater nine, who gave their lives to protect their girlfriends. (source)

Moodley was stabbed at about 8.30pm at the Fordsburg Square flea market
after shopping with Jagar on Saturday, April 26 as he tried to defend his future wife. (source)

Men give their lives to put women first
- and I have to wonder is it that Feminists don't know that
- or they do
but expect it from their disposable servant class?

From http://www.anesi.com/titanic.htm

Men die for women. We love women more than our lives.

But we do not love all women - we love the women who deserve our love.

Your claim that we must worship all women - and get nothing in return - is just madness, and abusive madness at that, and we do not and will not do your will, and you are welcome to leave our society and our company, and form your own in the company of your toxic Sisterhood

- and the only response from us will be a collective round of applause.

Ultra-short entry: What do Feminists mean by Diversity?

Women’s college enrollment gains leave men behind

Discriminating against men is good;
against white men is doubleplusgood!

All people are equal, but some are more equal than others.

Tell me again how Feminism stands for equality?

Robert Crumb, racism, and Je suis Charlie

Response to http://wimpygirlfriend.tumblr.com/post/107814202648/1-2-3-this-is-an-artist-you-are-standing-with


1, 2, 3
This is an artist you are standing with when you say “Je Suis Charlie”. The New York Observer published an interview between American cartoonist Robert Crumb (who lives in France) and NYO writer Celia Farber about the Charlie Hebdo shootings, who instead of criticizing or even noting Crumb’s controversial presence in the cartooning world, she flatters and agrees with the 71 year old. The most troubling statement by Farber was, "These guys were not trying not to offend, and that’s what an American media-conditioned mind cannot understand. The idea that yes, you offend those who abuse power.”

Charlie Hebdo’s incessant depictions of Muslims and their faith is not a satirical comment of those who abuse power; Muslims are a marginalized group in France, and Hebdo is the white industry that holds and abuses power via the media. Crumb and others have been writing off Hebdo’s legacy of islamaphobic content as ‘traditional satire unique to French culture’. It is too common for white artists and writers to justify their racism by claiming an activism against terror and “totalitarianism” in a postmodern culture through attacking the systematically oppressed with “satire”. 


Crumb later notes how in response to the shootings and his solidarity with Hebdo, he created a special drawing titled “The Hairy Ass of Muhammed”, which will be published in Liberation, as well as another drawing by his wife Aline. Farber called the acts “brave”, whereas his caption for the drawing was “A Cowardly Cartoonist”.
Robert Crumb has never had an interesting or informed comment about art, his own art, or politics in his life. As seen above, his ‘revival of folk art and culture’ is a sorry excuse to draw out the most hateful, racist images, and I am sad that he was even contacted from his mindless hole in France for an interview.

2:36 PM on Sunday 11th January 2015 with 1 note

"Charlie Hebdo’s incessant depictions of Muslims and their faith is not a satirical comment of those who abuse power"


Which has nothing to do with your point, which is that Robert Crumb is racist. Islam is not a race. No matter how much you seem to wish it was.

If you wish to argue the point that " depictions of Muslims and their faith is not a satirical comment " then you have to show those depictions. If you are afraid to do so - then you have no case.


" Muslims are a marginalized group in France, and Hebdo is the white industry that holds and abuses power via the media"

Really? And your evidence is?

So far, I've seen Muslims slaughtering Hebdo. Seems to me this 'power struggle' is rather one sided.

Since you don't seem capable of presenting any evidence to back up your rant, I'm just going to dismiss it.

"Robert Crumb has never had an interesting or informed comment about art, his own art, or politics in his life. "

Not interesting? So those people who experiences the emotion known as interest upon encountering his work were... ghosts? Holograms? What? Because a metric fuckload of people have done so, to the point where his stuff is always being reprinted. Yours? Nope.


When you die, you will be forgotten instantly. In fact, when I finish this post, it will be like you never were. Like a fart in a lift, you were unpleasant - but mercifully brief.

A hundred years from now, people will still be talking about him.

"As seen above, his ‘revival of folk art and culture’ is a sorry excuse to draw out the most hateful"

Actually I'd regard those as loving - since they parody the old racist depictions, making them absurd and ridiculous.

This is Mr Crumbs ideal. Notice the emphasis on the muscular legs, the large rounded buttocks. He is a fetishist, a lover of dominance and submission. He wants to dominate a dominant woman - to ride her.

He's obsessed with it, and it constantly is expressed in his art, which you would know if you weren't a low rent fascist with a yearning for atrocity.

You don't draw that which you hate with ideal characteristics.

Robert loves art that shocks - that is beautiful, that is ugly, that is carnal and fearful. He is fascinated by emotion - by imagery that pushes buttons.



These figures are greatly distorted, yes - but racist? How does it show him? As a tiny boy-man with an inflated head and an absurdly large hat.  And how does he draw her? with hate?

No, that's lust!




His depictions of sexuality are often bestial and disturbing.




(A symbolic depiction of his wife is usually the object of his desires in his artwork - they have a really complicated relationship, and I have to admit I'm envious of it. It's a kinky love, and it's been their since they were young, so many years ago. It's... passionate.)




But is Crumb racist?



A racist person exaggerates the beauty of their own kind and the ugliness of others. Crumb?



He twists everyone and everything, to show the absurdity of it all. It's a joke - but it's life, it's wonderful.



Compare that to genuine racism.



Here, the 'aryan' figures are stylised as beautiful and perfect...




and ever so fucking bland.


Only the enemy is distorted.

Crumb's not a racist. He's as ruthless with himself as he is with everyone else. White, black, whatever.








Note where he clings - as the black man was doing?

One thing i have noticed about racists - not only do they not usually want to fuck the people outside their race - but they don't usually imagine them as GOD...



He does both, with cheerful obscenity.

And when he's not joking?



He draws black people as... people. Lively, thoughtful, diverse.

Admired.



Heroic.

" I am sad that he was even contacted from his mindless hole in France for an interview. "

No doubt free speech makes you weep and rend your garments - or does it make you reach for a knife, a gun or a bomb? And what will you do to me, now I have disagreed with you? Will you cut off my head, and present it as a trophy?

Fuck you, vile tape-worm, burrowing into dung. You think you can kill me too?

See you in Hell.

Je suis Charlie