Even though women can sabotage condoms or use them to get pregnant anyway, sometimes a long time afterwards.
The ‘theft’ itself was alarmingly easy to carry out. One night, after sex, I took the used condom and, in the privacy of the bathroom, I did what I had to do. Bingo.
So where is the Feminist outrage at the double standard?
An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can’t claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep.
https://archive.is/iXbjS from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/#.Uc9r3n3LfK4 archived 29 Jun 2013 23:21:11 UTC
I am very much reminded of the case of Julian Assange, who was alleged to have also lied about a condom.
I am superior to you because I don't do sexy shoots
So what did Emma say that makes her seem hypocritical?
"Do as I say, not as I do"
I find this whole thing about being 18 and everyone expecting me to be this object..I find the whole concept of being 'sexy' embarrassing and confusing.
Personally, I don't actually think it's even that sexy. What's sexy about saying, 'I'm here with my boobs out and a short skirt...have a look at everything I've got'? My idea of sexy is that less is more. The less you reveal the more people can wonder.
I am superior to you because I can do this then criticise you for doing this
“As I was watching [the videos] I felt very conflicted, I felt her message felt very conflicted in the sense that on the one hand she is putting herself in a category of a feminist, but then the camera, it felt very male, such a male voyeuristic experience of her and I just wondered if you had thoughts about that or if you had any of your own thoughts about any of it really …”(source)
Emma Watson, making it clear that Beyonce's body is not her choice; Feminists will sanctimoniously decide for women what they may do - they are the new puritans, but an especially hypocritical variety.
The trouble is, "Classical Feminism" never existed - what you are describing is egalitarianism.
When Dworkin et al took over the teaching of Feminism at universities, and shaped the leadership of Feminism, then they determined how the movement was defined. It's exactly the same as Communism.
Young Communists will often argue that Lenin, Stalin, Mao etc etc are all irrelevant, because the bulk of communists were really, really nice. But they didn't oppose the authoritarian policies, and as we see in America, are very content with opposing liberal ideals such as Free Speech.
Feminists, as a group, campaign against businesses such as newspapers and Hooters, that use female sexuality - they call it objectification. But the businesses do not force women to work for them. Is it not "their body, their choice"?
Emma: Feminism is about choice!
Feminism: We will decide your choices for you.
It's not technically the first time she's done topless modelling,
but it is interesting that what she was wearing in her recent shoot would be banned for strippers in some US States
And you can say "oh, they are just the radicals", but where are all the nice feminists protecting those women's choices? When feminists jump onto runways to attack models because they feel modelling is objectification, there's no condemnation of it by Feminist leaders.
One of the things that surprised me when I learnt Modern History was that most Nazis were nice. They had no idea they were bad people, they didn't do violence themselves, they were good folks... but they didn't oppose the ones who were doing the horrors, because their leadership said things that made them feel good.
It's the same with Feminism. Feminists don't oppose organisations like NOW, they don't speak up when #HeForShe says that men must learn to serve women, they just want their feelgood fix and if that hurts men and women ... so be it.
"The No More Page 3 campaign called for the banning of boobs from the pages of tabloid newspapers like the Sun, because, it claimed, pictures of topless women have no place in print media.
However, the official campaign’s Facebook page celebrated Watson’s shoot, sharing an article that said ‘Emma Watson’s boobs prove we still need feminism’.
Feminists can’t seem to make up their minds: are women publicly baring their boobs good feminists, or bad women?"
Archived from http://www.avclub.com/article/showrunners-call-rape-shock-value-plague-industry-247025 7 Dec 2016 06:03:04 UTC https://archive.is/K9t5O
Showrunners call rape-for-shock-value a “plague on the industry”
Do they? Because it's been there since the first works of fiction were created. Along with incest, murder and insanity. So - are they to be eradicated as well? Will perfectly inoffensive fiction be created by a committee of the politically correct?
"In the wake of controversy surrounding comments from Last Tango In Paris director Bernardo Bertolucci"
"I would say out of those 200 scripts, there were probably 30 or 40 of them that opened with a rape or had a pretty savage rape at some point"
Yes. It pushes emotional buttons. You can have a billion dead male bodies and people will yawn. One female rape, an the pulses are racing! One male rape? Oh, that's called a comedy.
Or Amy Schumer having a night out.
"We were not going to do that thing where it’s about how the hero’s wife and child were killed"
Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru - was it a simple electrical fault, as the Empire claimed?
Ahh, so you are not going to motivate your audiences to care about the situation. An interesting tactic! So Luke Skywalker's adopted parents, in the revised Star Wars, will not be shot and burnt, well - not sure of they were shot, but it's kinder to think that they were. Instead, they shall all sit together braiding each other's hair.
It would certainly make for a shorter story. Save a lot on production costs. And on hiring cinemas, because who the hell would pay money to see that?
People want horrors. They want pain. To purge themselves. This has been known since the time of the Greek civilisation - yet somehow it's news to these guys.
"Most notably, Variety cited HBO’s blockbuster Game Of Thrones—long criticized for its willingness to deploy rape as a method of shock"
criticised by feminists, not people who actually create stuff, yes. I noticed the readers of that book series were perfectly happy to make it into a mega-best-seller despite the fact that a few ideologues shrieked UNACCEPTABLE every time a fictional woman suffered.
"If you’re going to do it, show it, and show it from the P.O.V. from the woman"
They half did that and you guys freaked. You really need to get your story straight, if only for an afternoon.
"don’t use it as a way to motivate a male character.”
Fine. Men are raped in prison all the time. Tell me about all the feminist stories where the woman who loves a male rape victim does something to avenge his pain.
I mean, there must be hundreds... dozens... one? Is there even one? Is there any single fiction a feminist has written where the value of a man's pain is enough for a woman to lift a finger?
Of course not, silly! Feminism is for everybody! Just not MEN.
"Here’s Melania Trump (right), America’s would-be first lady."
She was very excited by a chance to humiliate the slut who made her feel so ugly... I mean, who was terribly exploited by the Patriarchy and who needed saving from herself!
Feminist Initiative, Sweden's Feminist Political Party
Did she not read the memo? No proper Feminists likes that?
Unless... the one on the left actually identified as a woman, in which case it's perfectly proper!
I mean, I would have thought she'd be pleased to see women lying with other women, rather than being a horrible penis-loving gender traitor!
"Desi narrowminded conservative misogynist men"
If they are misogynistic, they hate women. It seems a bit strange that they'd be applauding this woman if they hated all women. This is a typical feminist tactic - when men say anything you don't like, just hit them with the slur that they hate all women.
Remember when a pop song drove Feminism into a frenzy?
You had a blonde white woman being used as an object!
...
But it was by a black woman, so that is the right sort of objectification!
Defining yourself as a body part is strong and empowering!
It's a terrible thing to say, because if there's one weakness men have is that most of them would give their lives for the women they love. But because the slur is impossible to disprove, feminists sling it about with malicious glee. They really are an appalling bunch!
But this is the strawman she's built here. Everyone mocking her hypocrisy in slutshaming Melania is being painted as conservative (which to Feminists automatically is heavily loaded with preconceptions - and is farcically untrue, many antifeminists are classically liberal).
Gay men who like Trump are clearly just narrow minded misogynists!
As for painting us as narrow-minded? Sweety, you're the one getting her knickers in a twist at the thought a woman might like to do things that make men's naughty bits stand up!
Feminists are happy to parade about with their vulvas hanging out
- but should you feel lust, they are ready with the shame!
So long as you are male, of course!
"Pornography/prostitution has nothing to do with women's emancipation"
Bullshit. Making money gives you power. Which is why people do it. You go down a coal mine or up a power line because it pays the bills, even when it means risking your life. Modelling or sex work is no different. Some people might enjoy their jobs, but almost all workers are doing it because they have to.
Feminism has no consistency.
Is sex work bad or good? Do strippers need to be saved? Is it ok for women to want men?
The only certainty is: "Men bad! Women good!"
That's how reality works. You don't get free stuff because you deserve it. You have to earn the stuff you want.
Feminists are naive communists. They think they can overthrow capitalism and have it that women just get free stuff because vagina.
THE WORLD DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY.
Outside of fantasy, food does not rain down from the sky. Houses do not build themselves. We earn our bread with the sweat from our brows and the blood from our blistered hands.
It's totally ok for female reporters to leer at and fondle a male athlete - but if this was gender reversed? Rape culture! Misogyny! Hatecrime!
"...something to do with sexual objectification"... something which has never been proven to exist, and is simply asserted time and again, a matter of faith.
Feminism: the doctrine that it is bad if a man does it, and good if a woman does it.
A man gazes with lust at a woman. The lust transforms her from a person into an object.
Only if it's a man, mind you. Feminists believe that female lust is pure. If women do to men what men do to women - it's totally ok, because... vagina!
This woman is too pretty! Unacceptable!!!
This nudity is acceptable to Feminism! It does not cause boners!
NO BONERS!!
But let's imagine a genie decided to make Feminist dogma true, and male lust could indeed 'objectify' women.
Why the hell would men allow them to be CEOS, Queens, even the leaders of Empires? Why would men commit suicide when their wives died, but not when their cars died? Why would a crime against a woman be treated so much more seriously than against a man?
And why would we punish women with jail sentences if we men thought of them as objects? Wouldn't we just destroy defective units?
It's funny how non-feminist countries have no problem with female soldiers, but feminist countries see women as weak, in need of protection.
Why the fuck would men give objects the vote? Give them guns and bombs and tanks? Give them the power to take life at a whim?
Feminist 'objectification' is superstitious clap-trap.
OR ISIT?!!
(DUM DUM DUMMMMM!)
See Also:
Women 'objectify men more than vice versa:
"Although all participants spent the majority of their viewing time looking at the genitals, female faces, and female bodies in the photos, women using hormonal contraceptives looked more often at the background of the photos and clothing than did men. That study also found that men looked more often at the female actors’ faces in the pictures than did women."
"Zane Alchin, 25, from Caringbah, was sentenced ... for using a carriage service to menace" So what did he say that was so terrible?
"feminists don’t get any action, so when you rape them it feels 100 times tighter”
This is obviously a joke, as even rapists don't want to stick their dicks in... her... (*shudder*)
"to menace"?
How was he menacing anyone?
Feminists joke about drowning boy babies just in case they grow up to become antifeminists.
It's totally cool when they do it, amiright?
He might have been annoying, true, but he made no credible threats. Heck, I remember hearing jokes about tossing babies into blenders. Don't recall anyone being arrested for hatecrime back then.
Perhaps it was because we understood that making a joke is nothing like actually doing something?
This man didn't threaten anyone, all he did was make a few crude jokes. Now, I agree they are in bad taste - but if you don't want to read his stuff, it's trivial to block someone on facebook.
Feminists justify laughing at the weeping of men as being a joke...
They justify laughing at the genocide of men as a joke..
... and physical assault? That's fucking hilarious to Feminists!
What feminists have decided is not only that they don't want to hear jokes directed at them, but you aren't allowed to make them in the first place. And they are the ones running the country.
Feminists constantly make the claim that they are an oppressed class, savaged by evil man-beasts as a part of the global conspiracy by all men against all women.
This is from a feminist video clip, where she is pretending to rape a man with a dildo as a joke. It is perfectly legal, because a feminist is doing it.
If a man made the gender reversed joke, it would be a crime.
Fainting Couch Feminists are always ready to be offended, always ready to be threatened, always ready to claim to be powerless.
Yet they can get men destroyed on a whim.
Who, exactly, is powerless?
Who, exactly, is the oppressed?
Parodying Feminism is now hatecrime? Why is it Feminists cannot take a joke?
Morgan was one of the founders of Modern Feminism, and has - with the aid of other man-haters like Dworkin - shaped the movement in her image.
Feminists write our laws.
Feminists hate half of humanity.
Why do we give them that power?
Who is really in power here?
Who is it who gets to ruin someone's life over a joke?
Follow-up:
Apparently I wasn't sufficiently clear when i said I was joking about Paloma imprisoning a man. He is currently at large, albeit with severe restrictions on his freedom, and - potentially - will remain so.
The planet he was living on, however, was not so lucky.
Feminists do not forgive, and they do not forget. Consider yourself warned.
