Unwanted child is no grounds to sue mum for lying about taking the pill?

 Unwanted child is no grounds to sue mum for lying about taking the pill

Sex is about consent. If two people have sex, they must trust each other.

She lied.

What would have happened if a man lied about contraception?

Feminist say that that is rape. Feminists have changed laws in some places to make that rape.

Yet I consistently see Feminists defending this decision.

He was the responsible party, not her.

He should have worn a condom.

Even though women can sabotage condoms or use them to get pregnant anyway, sometimes a long time afterwards.

The ‘theft’ itself was alarmingly easy to carry out. One night, after sex, I took the used condom and, in the privacy of the bathroom, I did what I had to do. Bingo.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2056875/Liz-Jones-baby-craving-drove-steal-husbands-sperm-ultimate-deception.html


Ex-girlfriend hid sperm and used for in-vitro pregnancy: suit

Men deceived into fatherhood are struggling to rescue their reproductive rights from the whim of women. Bettina Arndt reports.

Women have even tried, and presumably sometimes succeeded, to get pregnant when no penetration has occurred.

So where is the Feminist outrage at the double standard?

An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can’t claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep.

https://archive.is/iXbjS from http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/#.Uc9r3n3LfK4 archived 29 Jun 2013 23:21:11 UTC


I am very much reminded of the case of Julian Assange, who was alleged to have also lied about a condom.

That warranted a gigantic police operation, even though "the two Swedish women who accuse WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of sexual misconduct were at first not seeking to bring charges against him"

https://archive.is/Y4kfm archived 4 Mar 2017 13:21:45 UTC from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-wikileaks-assange-charges-idUSTRE6B669H20101207

Further Reading:

https://community.babycenter.com/post/a52628875/pregnant_from_sperm_retrieved_from_a_condom

Feminists denounce the rape of fictitious females - don't give a shit about real raped men

Archived from http://www.avclub.com/article/showrunners-call-rape-shock-value-plague-industry-247025 7 Dec 2016 06:03:04 UTC https://archive.is/K9t5O

Showrunners call rape-for-shock-value a “plague on the industry”

Do they? Because it's been there since the first works of fiction were created. Along with incest, murder and insanity. So - are they to be eradicated as well? Will perfectly inoffensive fiction be created by a committee of the politically correct?

"In the wake of controversy surrounding comments from Last Tango In Paris director Bernardo Bertolucci"

- which was manufactured for shock value, ironically enough. The truth of that situation was considered far too dull.

"I would say out of those 200 scripts, there were probably 30 or 40 of them that opened with a rape or had a pretty savage rape at some point"

Yes. It pushes emotional buttons. You can have a billion dead male bodies and people will yawn. One female rape, an the pulses are racing! One male rape? Oh, that's called a comedy.

Or Amy Schumer having a night out.

"We were not going to do that thing where it’s about how the hero’s wife and child were killed"

Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru
- was it a simple electrical fault, as the Empire claimed?

Ahh, so you are not going to motivate your audiences to care about the situation. An interesting tactic! So Luke Skywalker's adopted parents, in the revised Star Wars, will not be shot and burnt, well - not sure of they were shot, but it's kinder to think that they were. Instead, they shall all sit together braiding each other's hair.

It would certainly make for a shorter story. Save a lot on production costs. And on hiring cinemas, because who the hell would pay money to see that?

People want horrors. They want pain. To purge themselves. This has been known since the time of the Greek civilisation - yet somehow it's news to these guys.

"Most notably, Variety cited HBO’s blockbuster Game Of Thrones—long criticized for its willingness to deploy rape as a method of shock"

criticised by feminists, not people who actually create stuff, yes. I noticed the readers of that book series were perfectly happy to make it into a mega-best-seller despite the fact that a few ideologues shrieked UNACCEPTABLE every time a fictional woman suffered.

"If you’re going to do it, show it, and show it from the P.O.V. from the woman"

They half did that and you guys freaked. You really need to get your story straight, if only for an afternoon.

"don’t use it as a way to motivate a male character.”

Fine. Men are raped in prison all the time. Tell me about all the feminist stories where the woman who loves a male rape victim does something to avenge his pain.

I mean, there must be hundreds... dozens... one? Is there even one? Is there any single fiction a feminist has written where the value of a man's pain is enough for a woman to lift a finger?

Of course not, silly! Feminism is for everybody! Just not MEN.

Feminist claims: "Women can't rape women because then they would be raping themselves"

The Feminist Narrative is that men are vicious brutes and women - damsels in distress.

It robs women of power
and men of their humanity.

A reaction to:

Breaking The Male Code: After Steubenville, A Call To Action

You don't have to be a moron to be a Feminist.
Honestly, it's not a prerequisite.

"I don't know
how violence
against women became
a woman's issue"

Well, you must be fucking stupid. Violence against black people is a black issue, against gay people it's a gay issue, but against women - that just confuses you? How stupid are you!

SEX crimes committed by women have hit a record high.

By Katie Bowler / Published 22nd May 2016The pain of Aboriginal men abused by their women

"Not only do women get raped..."

Which happens in all female environments - but don't take our word for it luv, fuck off to your commune and see how long you last before you're devouring each other's carcasses.

Women rape men, and women rape children, and women can get even money from raping children - thanks to Feminism.

Eve Ensler is either a pedophile or an apologist.

Maybe she should try fixing that first?

"but we have to fix it!"

So you are complaining that you have to fix your own problems? You want men to do it for you?

Feminists constantly claim men are unnecessary, and imagine a utopia where all men are dead - yet their world would tear apart if the men simply downed tools.

Feminists never leave to form their own state, because then all the bodybags would be filled by their kind.

Men die at eleven times the rate in workplace accidents.

Almost all dangerous work, world-wide, is done by men.

Suddenly you need a fucking bicycle to pedal on, you goldfish?




Go on, piss off to that commune you are always promising to go to! But you won't, because you're a liar who thrives on playing a victim and never having to deal with any of the horrors a real victims faces.

 (Left to Right): Peter Buffett, Jimmie Briggs, Joe Ehrmann, Tony Porter,
 Dave Zirin and Moderator Eve Ensler.

Eve Ensler is either surrounded by vicious man-beasts...
or by gentle, protective men, who love women.

To the point they will blindly sacrifice the lives of other men to protect a woman
who sees them as monsters.


Feminism claims it is the former - antifeminism says it is the latter.
Which do you believe?

If men are monsters,
why the fuck do feminists choose to sit amongst them without even a gun?

 http://www.nclrights.org/sexual-assault-in-the-lgbt-community/

"April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month. This month is a reminder that through a combination of stigma and myths, sexual assault in the LGBT community is often rendered invisible or dismissed outright, despite CDC statistics that show the sexual assault rate for LGBT individuals is comparable or higher than the sexual assault rate for heterosexual individuals.

Approximately 1 in 8 lesbian women and nearly half of bisexual women experience rape in their lifetime"

And who is that renders that crime invisible? That wants to push the victims down under the waters, because they are inconvenient?

Feminists do.


Because they benefit from appealing to the natural defensive instinct of men and women - we love women, we try and protect women - and here she is appealing to men while telling men that they are born monsters and women are born saints.

Well, women aren't saints, and men aren't monsters - but Feminists?

They can fuck right off back to Hell for all I care.

---

Feminism says it is about equality - does it treat men and women equally?

Further Reading:

Female teacher faces 23 sexual assault charges, including 15 counts of sexual penetration and one count of persistent sexual conduct with a child aged under 16.(source)


The Rantzerker examines Eve Ensler - and lives to tell the tale!

Violent Female Criminals

Evil is Everywhere

Sexual harassment unpunished?

‘Sex-obsessed’ teacher is back in school, despite written testimony from ten colleagues and accounts from numerous students (source)

The Internal Investigation found she had no case to answer. Who runs those? Feminists do! They protect their own. It will be interesting to see how the civil courts deal with her - they are not so inclined to Listen and Believe.

"He beats me. I'm scared", says the ABC, of the terrible man-beasts roaming the country!

Mother pimped out her own daughter

Feminism has so much to offer everybody, regardless of gender, so STFU, ShitLords!

Nearly Half of Young Men Say They’ve Had ‘Unwanted’ Sex


Mother, 55, in a sexual relationship with her nephew, 42, helped him to rape her 12-year-old daughter by holding her legs down

Toledo woman threatened boy into having sex with her

Laws that affect women and men equally are misogyny sexist raaaaaape.

Update:

Looks like Outrage culture deliberately misrepresented the situation: A controversial Oklahoma court ruling was widely misinterpreted to mean that under state law, rape charges cannot be brought if the victim was intoxicated.


Ruling here

---

A response to "Oklahoma Court: Oral Sex is Not Rape if Victim is Unconscious From Drinking"

28 Apr 2016 23:25:52 UTC

http://viralwomen.com/post/oklahoma_court_oral_sex_is_not_rape_if_victim_is_unconscious_from_drinking

'We will not, in order to justify prosecution of a person for an offense, enlarge a statute beyond the fair meaning of its language.’

(source)

Which sounds perfectly reasonable to me, and persecution to Feminists. Why are they angry about that judgement?

They seem to want to abandon the law and just have kangaroo courts.

"Listen and Believe" in practice.

‘

"decision asvictim¹[sic] blaming"?

"Campaigners and legal experts have criticised the "insane" decision asvictim blaming "

Usually a link backs up your argument. The link here just talks about a different issue.

It's almost as if the author thought:

"I don't actually have any evidence to back up my assertions so i better pretend to have some legal experts agreeing - they won't check anyway, those idiots will just Listen and Believe (TM)".

‘We will not, in order to justify prosecution of a person for an offense, enlarge a statute beyond the fair meaning of its language.’ - See more at: http://viralwomen.com/post/oklahoma_court_oral_sex_is_not_rape_if_victim_is_unconscious_from_drinking#sthash.5KLxNWs3.dpuf

Since the statute applies without any sexual bias, how is it a women's rights issue?


"The court argued that, under this statute of law, incapacitation by drinking didn’t apply as it wasn’t on the list of circumstances that constitute force."


It wasn't a group of men deciding to be mean to women - it was a statute with a loophole. That happens all the time because people are not omniscient, but you Feminists automatically interpret it as malicious and biased against one sex only - despite it applying equally to both sexes.

If Feminists cared about justice, they would want rape laws to apply to everyone, not just to men. They would want female rapists punished, and punished exactly as severely, instead of wanting them to walk free.


If men are so awful that they are writing laws to hurt you, why on earth do you Feminists share a country with them?

Seriously, move away, form your utopia, prove to the rest of the world how much better you are without us.

But Feminists never will. They bitch, and they moan, and they whine, for men to solve all their problems, while patting themselves on the back for being independent.

These are strong women.

This is a Feminist.

Which of these two groups do you think would be able to build a civilisation?

---

Follow-up:

Oklahoma Legislators Seek Change in Sodomy Law After Ruling

Which means this is a non-issue. A loophole, affecting both sexes, was discovered, and will be closed. There's no conspiracy here against women.But if you look at , it's framed as proof of the wicked men in power persecuting women, and the commentators on the Feminist side are only interested in the victim narrative.

Feminist response:

Mostly just abuse - it does amuse me how ready they are to call someone "cunt" and then run screaming to the harassment police if i reply with exactly the same term.

"It's a human issue.
Seriously, you read this article and that's all you have to say?
No empathy for this victim?
No outrage over this loophole?
Wow.. Perhaps it's just YOU who needs to move away. My male people are wonderful, caring human beings."

Notice they avoid dealing with the arguments and focus on emotive manipulation. "Feelz over Facts" is the Feminist mantra.

My counter-response:

"It's a human issue."

This page isn't "human interest news", the article doesn't treat it as a human rights issue but as a persecution of women by men - as do all the feminist commentators I can find here.

"Seriously, you read this article and that's all you have to say?"

No, which is why i linked my comments separately.

"No empathy for this victim?"

None has been shown on this page for men who have been raped but unable to charge their attackers due to Feminist legislation.

You don't seem worried by that - your demand that I SHOW empathy but no-one else on your team has to DO so is very revealing.

"No outrage over this loophole?"

The one that is being closed? Do you get angry over potholes that are being filled? Bad things happen. In this case it was an accident. You don't seem to care because you see that accident as proof of malice. That is paranoia.

"Wow.. Perhaps it's just YOU who needs to move away."

You realise if you moved away from me, that's exactly what would happen? That's how it works?

But we non-Feminists are the majority, and we get on perfectly well. Why should we abandon our civilisation - especially as you show no sign of being able to cope five minutes without us?

"My male people are wonderful, caring human beings"

I hope you gave them a good pat on the head and a tasty treat. Yet you don't seem to care that your sibling paints them as toxic monsters?

Y'know, some Nazis kept Jewish women as mistresses - it doesn't mean they liked Jews. How do you treat men? You join in the group hate sessions quite readily. What does that say about you?

A typical example of Feminist abuse.
It's an abuse of my eye-sight, especially.

---

¹Ouch. Typos. I am worried about their ass-victim tho', I'd see a doctor about that. I mean, I make typos all the time - but I'm doing this for my own benefit, not for something that claims to be professional. Oh well.

Madonna creates kiddy porn? Feminists don't care.

" she invited a young woman on stage and exposed the girl's breast by pulling down her top ... The girl, reportedly aged 17, can be seen reacting with shock before quickly pulling her top back up." (source)

So Madonna, the Feminist, created child pornography by the definition of most legal codes. She exposed, without consent, the private areas of a minor in such a way that they were not just filmed, but distributed.

And the consequences of her doing this are...

None of course. Women are saints. Men are devils. #Feminism tells us this every day.

Imagine if a male musician had done that to a young girl. There'd be marches in the streets and call for them to be banned.

So how does Feminism - a movement that claims to be for everybody, to be for equality - react?

With silence. Or by defending her. No hashtag campaign, no "Women must be taught not to rape!"

"It's ok when we do it" seems to be their motto.

Australian Government says it wants Social Justice for 'all' rape victims!

If you are man subject to domestic violence in australia, you can get help on this website... https://www.1800respect.org.au/get-help/

Because violence against women is unacceptable!
Errr... wait...

Just against women?

This is equivalent to having it say violence against straight people, or white people, or tall people... why narrow it down just to women, it takes MORE effort to do that than to just say "domestic violence is wrong".

So you try to get help...

https://www.1800respect.org.au/common-questions/who-can-i-talk-to-about-domestic-family-violence-or-sexual-assault/new-south-wales-counselling-services/

and it directs you to

"Women’s Health Centres

These regional services can also provide information and referrals for women who have experienced domestic and family violence or sexual abuse and assault.  "

Yup. It's pretty clear they aren't going to help you if you're male.

It also points to http://www.rape-dvservices.org.au/ who says:

"The organisation also provides counselling for women who experienced sexual assault in childhood from a number of Women’s Health Centres across NSW. "

So here's a question. Say you were born a girl, and were raped. You would get help. But say you were transgender... on the day you transitioned, you would be thrown out, no support, regarded as a victimiser automatically.

"Rape & Domestic Violence Services Australia is committed to upholding the rights of all people to live in a socially just, equitable and non violent society."

Social 'Justice'? So long as you're not male, of course.

Amanda Marcotte, you lying sack of shit.

You claim false rape allegations are as rare as zombie bites?

https://archive.is/PtTgY



The Police have prosecuted people for false allegations. Which you claim cannot possibly exist. Surely you should drop everything and rush to the aid of these poor damsels in distress?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_accusation_of_rape

Hmm. Studies show it ranging from 2-90%. The true number is unknowable - except that it isn't zero, now, is it?

Still, quoting Manboobz as your source means you aren't terribly serious about facts.

I love the way you see a recording of sexual encounters as being a way of enabling rape - so even if a man has a recording of an encounter with a woman going "I want sex" every thirty seconds, you'll turn around and have that man charged as a rapist?

Yup. That's the sort of world you want us to live in.

Amanda Marcotte, you are the biggest recruiting tool we could wish for.

Sexual offence law overhaul to remove the presumption of innocence

Under the changes to sexual offence laws: (archived 1 Jul 2015 07:36:44 UTC from http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/sexual-offence-law-overhaul-to-address-victim-injustices-20150629-gi0m15.html)

• An alleged offender must have a "reasonable" belief that a victim had consented. The new definition means the defendant must detail the steps they have taken to find out whether the victim has consented.
  
  Note: They have no defined standard here for innocence. They have to present what they have and hope it is enough. Do you record all your sexual activity? Is it signed? Are there witnesses to the signing? What about blood tests - she might have been drinking - can you prove she wasn’t? If she was, her consent is invalid. You just should have known.
• Removal of a time limitation that prevented prosecution for some child sex offences committed before 1991
  
  It’s retrospective. You kept all your records of what happened thirty years ago, didn’t you? Remember: no physical evidence of a crime is required. If a woman says “give me thirty grand or I’ll say you raped me”... you better have that thirty K!
  
  "an offender must prove that if they believed a victim was consenting, that belief was not unreasonable". How? Will video recordings and witnesses be required? Some sort of contract? All this is is a license to accuse any man of rape, without a defense.. and I guarantee you no women will be convicted.

Lesbian attempts rape. Victim cannot comprehend the attack. Feminists jazz hand madly.

Lesbian allegedly attacked wife Attempt to impregnate with "turkey baster" Attempted rape charges not pressed

Feminism teaches women that all men are rapists - and no women.

They also confiscated a container of semen donated by Stephanie's brother, Nicholas Lighten, and some aluminium that also apparently had contained the semen.

Is there any innocent explanation for this? Is there any chance of misunderstanding?

Jennifer Lighten has declined to press attempted rape charges because she does not believe Stephanie seriously intended to impregnate her.

She could not believe it. It was against feminist conditioning. Men are wicked. Women are angelic. How could an angel rape you?

Data shows domestic violence, rape an issue for gays

“Gay people in the United States are just as likely as heterosexuals to experience domestic violence, sexual violence or stalking, and bisexual women are more likely than other women to be abused”

US department of Justice: “1 in 9 lesbian/bisexual women have been raped by a female partner.”

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181867.pdf page 29 and 30

With thanks to http://occupymelbourne.net/2013/06/18/stop-lesbian-rape-culture/

Debunk Feminism

Reblogged from http://lady-of-anti-feminism.tumblr.com/post/78622128314/debunk-feminism

I got a lot of this from the amazing oratorasaurus  as well as other amazing antifeminists. I will add as I go along.

“The Wage Gap”

• The Wage Gap is a myth. 1 2
• Women tend to choose majors that pay a lower national median pay.
• Women Now a Majority in American Workplaces
• Labor force participation rate for men has never been lower.
• Women in some cases make more than men.
• And their husbands dont have a problem with it either.
• Women CHOOSE to stay away from STEM field
• There is no STEM gender gap in the U.S
• Women In Tech Make More Money And Land Better Jobs Than Men

Domestic Violence

• Women are perpetrators often as men.
• 286 sources on assaults on partners by women
• Women are more violent
• Domestic violence being equally committed by women, only males get arrested
• Men are over 40% of domestic abuse victims
• Male DV victims are discriminated against
• Gay and bisexual men experience abuse in intimate partner relationships at a rate of 2 in 5, which is comparable to the amount of domestic violence experienced by heterosexual women.
• About 17-45% of lesbians report having been the victim of a least one act of physical violence perpetrated by a lesbian partner (1,5,6,13).
• Men or DV is Not the leading cause of death among women under 50
• More DV facts

Rape Culture

• Statistics doesn’t back up Rape culture
• RAINN debunks Rape culture
• “97% of rapists never see a day in jail” is a myth
• Lesbian on Lesbian Rape
• Inflation of anti-human trafficking statistics
• Men who are falsely accused of rape can have their names published and their lives ruined even if they are not convicted or charged - their accuser is protected and is likely to face no punishment, or a light one.
• Under a recent federal directive, men are convicted of rape in university campuses if the investigating board finds that the chances they committed the rape are at 50.00001% or greater.
• The DOE policy in practice: Caleb Warner was accused of rape and expelled from the University of North Dakota, then his accuser was charged with filing a false report. He remains expelled as of June 2011
• Woman rapes boy, woman becomes pregnant, boy must paid child support.
• 40% of rapists are female  1
• Definition of rape, erases victims of rape who are forced to penetrate, generally men who are forced to have sex with women.
• Men are raped in the military
• Men Outnumber Women Among American Rape Victims
• Male statutory rape victims forced to pay child support
• 59% of the rapists had been heterosexually molested.
• Female Pedophiles Cause Children More Harm, According to Research by University of Bergen, Norway
• males and females carried out sexual violence at strikingly similar rates after the age of 18
• Female-on-male sexual assault is under reported

Mens Issues

• A man is approximately 165% more likely to be convicted than a woman
•  Men are significantly more likely to be the victims of violent crime
• Men and Boys are doing worse in all aspects of the educational system, from kindergarten to university.
• Men suffer from Paternity fraud
• Female business owners get money from the government for being female. Males?no
• Some Airlines, have banned male from sitting next to children because they are men.
• Rape of males in Prison and jail
• Male circumcision is still legal
• Men often coerced into sex: study
• Boy victims of sex trafficking ignored
• Men are 93 % of work place death/violence.
• Eating disorders among men and boys
• Demonization of Male Sexuality
• Catastrophically high suicide male rate
• Literally zero male shelters
• 75-80% of the Homeless are men
• Family courts are bais against men.
• Breast Cancer gets more funding/research/drugs than Prostate cancer despite affecting men at a similar rate of women.
• Divorced men are 40% more likely to commit suicide
• Founder of Canadas only male shelter for abuse forced to close due to lack of funding before committing suicide. 
• Shame men into going to war.

Female Privilege

• Women receive lighter sentences and a higher chance of acquittal, simply for being women   1
• 94% of sexually abused youth in correctional facilities reported being abused by female staff. Only 40% of the staff is female.
• Inmates reporting staff sexual misconduct, ~ 65% reported a female aggressor
• Study of US college women - 12% of the respondents reported ever using any type of force strategy while 43% reported using a coercion strategy and 92% reported using a seduction strategy to initiate sex.
• Mothers kill children at twice the rate of fathers.
• For Every 100 girls..
• Women actually control 80% of household spending, and 51.3% of private wealth.
• Women receive custody in over 90% of divorce proceedings
• Women initiating divorce between 66% and 90% of the time.
• Women make up the majority of college graduates
• School system favors girls starting from Kindergarten
• Female felons should serve home sentences.
• Told judges to be lenient on women.

Feminists being horrible

• Feminists skewed the Definition of Domestic Abuse, resulting in only male abusers being arrested and female abusers not.
• Feminists’s DV training hurts Police training
• The feminist group WAR has petitioned to have the government stop prosecuting women for filing false accusations
• Feminist Mary Koss denies male rape victims.
• Feminists violently protesting against Warren Farrell at U of Toronto
• 17,000 feminists at protest attack and sexually molesting a group of Rosary-praying Catholic men who were peacefully protecting the cathedral in the city of San Juan from threats of vandalism.
• Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands.
• Feminists fought a law for equal custody to be the default if both parents want custody and neither parent is unfit. Multiple times.
• Feminists started a campaign against Father’s rights groups
• Feminists fought against laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.
• Feminists fought against a law to end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.
• Feminist fought against men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.
• Feminists in India and Israel fought against female rapists being arrested, charged and convicted of rape.
• Feminists fought against a economic stimulus for male-dominated job such as construction, etc.
  
• Feminist fought a law against  Paternity Fraud.
• Hateful Quotes by Feminsts
• Feminist Harriet Harman has publicly requested employers to hire women in preference to White men if both job candidates are equally
• Equality Minister,feminist Patricia Hewitt, was found guilty of breaching the Sex Discrimination Act by “overlooking a strong male candidate for a job in favour of a weaker female applicant”.
• Elected in 2009, the lesbian feminist prime minister Johanna Sigurdardottir has vowed to “end of the Age of Testosterone
• Feminists want to make peeing while standing illegal
• Erin Pizzey had to flee the UK because she and her family received death threats and her dog murdered all because feminists didn’t like that she discovered women were equally as violent as men.
• Also Suzanne Steinmetz and her children received death threats and bomb threats she discovered that  the rate at which men were victimized by domestic violence was similar to the rate for women.
• Richard Gelles and Murray Straus  have all received death threats from feminists, simply for publishing their findings (that female-to-male family violence was equal to the rate of male-to-female violence).
• Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism.
• Try to shut down female prisons.
• Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide.
• Jezebel mocks men who are abused.
• Create rape laws that exclude female rapists.
• Make it impossible to charge women with rape.
• Feminists cover up female domestic violence.
• Feminists don’t want the gov to help unemployed men.
• Feminists say men can’t talk about domestic abuse.
• Feminists say Men can’t be raped. 
• Feminists cover up female domestic abuse stats.

---

See also:

Debunking 5 common feminists arguments

DPP rules all men are now rapists

So much for "Innocent until proven guilty". Feminists just destroyed 1500 years of legal principle.

The Director of Public Prosecutions said it was time for the legal system to move beyond the concept of “no means no”

Really? Despite the idea that adults are able to articulate yes or no, and this is reducing women to the status of children? Because it only casts women as victims here, and men as victimisers. It's very clear they want to prosecute men - lots of them! Perhaps they have a motive other than justice?


"Men accused of date rape will need to convince police that a woman consented to sex"

How? Whereabouts is the bar? Do they need a written contract? Will a witness be required? A Justice of the Peace?

In no other area of the law would they be vague about the required method of obeying the law.

"Prove you're innocent!" is something we abandoned with witch-hunts and show-trials. It's very clear there's no way to prove you're innocent; once accused, the lynching can begin.

"Alison Saunders said rape victims should no longer be “blamed” by society if they are too drunk to consent to sex"

Note she never defines how drunk is too drunk. One glass of wine? We don't have that vagueness for motor vehicles or heavy machinery. Can there be any innocent reason for phrasing a law in such an inept manner? Or is it more likely to have been chosen in order to persecute men?

And, of course, she never addresses the case where two people drink equally then have sex - the logical paradox of having people simultaneously be rape victims and rapists never seems to occur to her.

Either she cheated through her exams and did a lot of favours to get her qualifications  - or she is corrupt, and is knowingly passing corrupt legislation.


" “a suspect held a position of power over the potential victim - as a teacher, an employer, a doctor or a fellow gang member”"

So it's rape if you have sex with your boss? Even if you chased them, you can destroy them as your rapist? Even if they had recordings that was your plot - she has no problems with that?

And "a fellow gang member”??? A peer is.. in her warped mind ... a superior?

HOW DOES THAT EVEN WORK?

Of course, the subtext is " a MALE gang member with a FEMALE ”

Because women are weak and feeble, and even if they say yes, it secretly means no.

THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM A MALICIOUS WOMAN UNDER THESE LAWS.

Let's look at her definition of victimisation:

"The ability to consent to sex should also be questioned where the complainant has mental health problems"

MOST PEOPLE HAVE THOSE AT SOME TIME OR ANOTHER.

We do not describe such people as incapable of making decisions. If you sign a contract and were a bit depressed - you are still liable! You have to be very seriously ill for the court to regard you as incapacitated.

Yet she wants any woman to say "it doesn't matter that i was recorded shouting yes every 30 seconds; i secretly meant no because i saw a nasty message on twitter!"

The new guidance also covers domestic violence situations and those where “the complainant may be financially or otherwise dependent on their alleged rapist”.

Yep, if someone is financially dependent on YOU, YOU ARE RAPING THEM.

But wait! Maybe I'm misreading the gender bias here! Surely the law will be applied fairly?

 "Around 85,000 women per year are victims of rape in the UK, of whom 90 per cent know the perpetrator. The most recent figures showed that just 15,670 women reported rapes to the police"

Ok, they just made up a number, because saying 85000 women were raped required omniscience - there's 15,670 reports, and a lot go unproven - so 1,070 convictions resulting from the 2,910 cases that got to court means 1,070  CONVICTIONS PROVEN, NOT 85000!

No mention of men being raped. Not an option in their minds. There's no chance they don't have in mind how this law is to be applied. Men are wicked - women are saints.

"The rape conference was designed partly to address the long-standing gulf between rape allegations and conviction"

Well yes - like in the Soviet Union, every accusation will automatically carry a conviction. It will simplify matters. Perhaps they'll provide weeping confessions on television, before they have them shot.

Susan Dwyer, and why we must learn to stop worrying and love the Sisterhood.

The destruction of the presumption of innocence, a 1500 year old principle, is, in this Feminist's opinion,

"a welcome innovation"

"Despite the criticisms, a “yes means yes” policy is a welcome innovation in tackling sexual misconduct of all kinds"

ALL kinds? Great! So it will stop false rape accusations? Boy. That is one neat trick.

How, exactly, will it manage that?



" it targets the stereotypical attitudes about gender that lead to problematic sexual behavior"

 That women, like men, are able to articulate their opinions? Yes, I can see that would be very problematic, if you view women as frightened children.

 " if the new standard changes the conversation about sexual assault"

 Well, yes, it will now change it to "please do not charge me with sexual assault just out of a whim, which you can now do with impunity"

 "Consent creates a kind of moral magic"

 Strangly enough, law courts disagree with you. In every other arena, if you agree to something, then you agree to it. No magic there, sorry. Maybe... maybe I'm wrong! And Judge Judy is really a witch! Aieeee!

 But, yes, I can see YOU might find the notion of consent incomprehensible.

 "Some critics say that it is unclear what will count as affirmative consent"

 Yes. Because they asked the people enforcing it "what will count as affirmative consent". Still waiting on the answer, btw. Any day now. Any day.

 "the new standard does not require a signed contract between students before sexual activity may occur"

 Is that your legal opinion? Because the lawyers who've examined this say they have no idea how someone can establish consent. If they don't know, how come you do?

 Oh right. Magic. Sorry I asked.


 "After all, it is the rare individual who can specify in advance of a particular sexual episode what actions she consents to. "

 Nice of you to point out it's only females who can't do this, but I'm afraid you need to refine it further. It's feminists who are incapble. The rest of us manage just fine.

 "Could you say beforehand whether you will not consent to having your wrists firmly held above your head during intercourse?"

 Yes. Is that really difficult? Oh right, I'm talking to someone who thinks consent is witchcraft.

 "What it does require is conversation"

 In the middle of sex. To put it bluntly, instead of fucking like animals, you will now have to chatter continuously - and since you cannot prove someoen verbally consented, unless you record the event (which may itself be a crime), then your partner can renege after the event. As has been frequently pointed out, as you no doubt know about and just don't care.

 "sex may not typically be considered a chatty activity, but in truth, it’s only cultural assumptions that make us feel awkward asking our partners whether a certain activity is OK with them."

 Oh right, all those scientists who say otherwise, jeez, what idiots they must be. They should stop doing science and do more gender studies, like you.

 "On reflection, it should strike us as odd that we are supposed to know what our partners want "

 If only there was some sort of communication which was non-verbal... gosh... if only some bright spark could have invented that millions and millions of years ago.

 " One cannot presume, without considerable discussion, what a new partner might or might not enjoy. "

 Which is why I have to aks each partner if they would like to have their nails removed with pliers.

 "in such relationships affirmative consent may not be required in any definitive form"

 Except it's been pointed out no exceptions exist in the legislation, so thank you for giving legal advice WHEN YOU ARE NOT QUALIFIED. YOU TURNIP.

 " one element of consent is always in play: It can be revoked at any time"

 Such as the second before a man ejaculates. Oh dear! He should have held it back! No doubt the next decade he spends behind bars being raped and beaten will teach him better control.

 "Although the change in policy is positive"

 in your opinion, which you are stating as fact.

 "Its adoption will not eliminate sexual assault on campus. "

 Finally got something right!


 "specialized victim support"

 For everyone? Or just women? It's just women, isn't it?

 "confidentiality and reporting protocols."

 Because the ability to face your accuser is so passe! If Jane Demoray wants to destroy Brent Smith, why, she can just say he done the deed, and be Believed. That's what your propaganda says we should do with 'survivors'. "Believe". Don't think!! Believe.

 " its adoption will, over time, change the perspective from which students and administrators view sexual misconduct"

 Yes. Student males will know that any sexual contact with a female can arbitrarily result in their destruction. Administrators will know that 1500 years of legal principle has been erased. Without any ballot on the matter, no referendum...Innocent Until Proven Guilty? Just. Gone.

 " only a morally repulsive assumption about women’s psychology would lead us to think that the policy increases the mendacity of those who report sexual assault."

 Ah. Ad hominem. How refreshing. It's been minutes since of your mob launched one at me. Did you want to tell me I have a stinky bottom too?


 " The change shifts the burden of proof from the accuser, who had to show that she resisted, to the accused, who must now show that he sought and received her consent"

 As I said. No more presumption of innocence. And no legal way is outlined to prove innocence. If accused, guilty. I'm surprised you bother with trials. Will you televise them? Will you make them confess, weeping, of their crimes against The Party?


 "The sexual abuse of women has a long and complex history"

 Oh, and here I was thinking feminism was about equality. EGALITARIANS WOULD HAVE SAID IT WAS EVERYONE'S SEXUAL ABUSE THAT MATTERED.

 " arguably, the causes of sexual assault on campus and the situations in which it occurs differ from those in wider society"

 I can argue the moon is a giant turnip, it doesn't make it true. YOU HAVE ADVANCED NO EVIDENCE. YOU MERELY WEASEL-WORD YOUR WAY THROUGH LIFE.

 "Susan Dwyer is an associate professor of philosophy at the University of Maryland."

 I weep for the University of Maryland.

 "she specializes in areas at the intersection of moral philosophy"

 Yet seems devoid of any herself.


" constitutional law"

What? i don't see a law degree here. http://www.philosophy.umd.edu/people/dwyer#tabs-1

Was it bought over the internet? Hope you kept the receipt!

" feminist theory"

didn't see that coming. Really, what more do you need to say?

A Million Mangina March?

http://www.athensnews.com/ohio/article-43643-high-heels-testosterone.html


" in support of ending sexual violence against women."

How will crossdressing accomplish this task, and why only against women*? Will women be doing anything to help male victims? Haha, only kidding, of course they won't. Feminism is HeForShe, never the other way around.

" a hope for a future where sexual violence will no longer exist in society."

Why not hope for a future where violence will no longer exist in society? Because that's insane. Because limiting such things through laws and police is the best solution we have - and it's worked pretty well. Violence is far lower, sexual and otherwise, than it used to be.

Crossdressing has nothing to do with it, and is instead propaganda claiming that women are the only victims, men the perpetrators of all evil, and that women need men to protect them and can't do things for themselves - ironically in direct contradiction to the feminist mantra that "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle".

"It takes a strong man to be a partner and ally to those who are the victims to sexual violence"

Who are invariably female, by their understanding. It's interesting that it's not
""It takes a strong person to be a partner and ally to those who are the victims to sexual violence"

because of course, if you have a vagina, you can forget about it; it's none of your concern. Let the men do all the work.

"(It takes) even a stronger one who has the courage and self-respect to call other men on their sexist and disrespectful behavior and intervene in potentially dangerous situations"


Firstly, again it's emphasised that only men have to do this, secondly it's painted as if only men were sexist (and that sexual violence has to do with sexism, when it's mostly opportunism by the amoral elements of society) and thirdly RESPECT HAS TO BE EARNED.

You do no merit respect automatically because you have a vagina any more than if you have a penis.
If feminism was an egalitarian movement, this would be a no-brainer. The fact it's never considered is further proof that feminism is a deeply sexist movement.


"Real men ask permission"

Ah, the no true Scotsman fallacy, it must have been a billionth of a second since a feminist used that one last. Listen, whether men ask permission or not, they are still real men. They might be bad men or good men, depending on your understanding of morality BUT THEY ARE ALL REAL MEN.

And you don't need to verbalise with women any more than you do with men. If a woman touches up a man, and then man touches up the woman, and they have intercourse, by the Feminist PoV, he just RAPED her, because he didn't "ask permission".

Most people are completely happy with having sex without chatting throughout the process, and continually asking if you can continue is the biggest mood-killer i can imagine. Ok, next to my partner being Lena Dunham.

Feminists look at a couple who have been married for twenty years and happily enjoy each others bodies and decide "I MUST POLICE THEM".

He must be evaluated to see if he continually verbalises; she is a childlike waif who is incapable of saying "stop" when she needs to.

He, of course, is always ready and wanting for sex, so she never needs to ask him by their rules.
"I think that many men and every man on this campus is all ready to give this much pain to make sure that women can have equal rights as men and enjoy this campus," Pashtun said.


Well, job done then. Name one right men have in the West that women don't.

Just one. Take your time.

Would you like to phone a friend?

Let's swap it. Imagine if Feminism WAS an egalitarian movement. One that cared to make sure women and men were treated equally. Yes, that is quite difficult, can i recommend a Bex and  a lie-down afterwards - but just for a moment, imagine they actually walked the walk and not just talked the talk.

What would the women wear?

Combat boots.

Women cannot be conscripted in the West. In the United States, the difference is so substantial that a man does not even have suffrage unless he agrees to conscription. It's called Selective Service.

Now, count up all the Feminist organisations that want SS applied without sex-based rules.

I'll give you a hint: it's the same number as unicorns running for President in Uruguay in October.

*Why is it only straight women, anyway, do feminists imagine lesbian rape is a contradiction in terms?
Well that's exactly the argument used by Mary P. Koss of the CDC to justify rape laws that granted immunity to most female rape crimes. And "The Vagina Monologues" explicitly claimed it was "Good Rape" when an adult woman molests a child. So yeah, Feminists erase it or even praise it when it's done by a woman.
And when a man does it - all men did it, and all must be blamed.

1 out of 4 women get raped in their lifetime?

Reblogged from http://dontneedfeminism.tumblr.com/post/82665204122/thoughts-on-the-1-out-of-4-women-get-raped-in-their

Anonymous Asks:

Thoughts on the 1 out of 4 women get raped in their lifetime statistic?

dontneedfeminism:

It’s bull shit.
Not only is it from a study done in 1994, but 73% of the women they labeled as “rape victims” didn’t believe they had been raped, and about 40% of them went on to date their “rapist” after the fact.
So, if we don’t count the 73%, that brings the number down to 1 in 16. Still not great, but again, it’s from 20 years ago. Now lets factor in that, since 1994, rape has gone down by 80%.
That means that at the MOST, the rape rate of women is 1 in 80, which comes out to 1,875,000 college-aged women who have been raped (in the US).
Even if you restrict this to being just women who are 18-25 (about college age), that is *still* not 1 in 4, as there were approximately 20+ million women between the ages of 18 and 25 in 2000.
So, simply as a matter of fact, the 1 in 4 statistic is a lie. Anyone who uses it is simply spreading rape hysteria and propaganda.

sheabutterwitchcraft-nigga:
http://www.statisticbrain.com/rape-statistics/ sure keep saying saying that but this is from the year 2013 with the most recent percentages of rape that happened in the year 2013

dontneedfeminism Said:

Actually you’re wrong.


If you look under the college rape section you will see the following:

“The following is from a study of 6,000 college students on 32 college campuses nationwide in 1987”
“The following is from a CDC study of 5,000 women on 138 college campuses in 1995”
The section labelled “rape statistics” is unsourced, but it says that 89,000 rape are reported each year.

So lets see what it takes to get to “1 in 4”.

Lets go with 156 million women (about half the US population), and divide that by 4. That gives us 39 million.

Now lets divide that by the rape rate of 89,000. That comes out to approximately 438. That means, at a rate of 89,000 rapes a year, it would take 438 years worth of rapes to get “1 in 4”.

But then there’s that “60% of rapes are never reported” statistic. So lets factor that in.

Multiply the 89,000 by 2.5 (1/.4 = 2.5) and we get 225,000.

Now lets divide the 39 million by that again. We get 173.

So, even factoring in the 60% unreported rape, it would still take nearly 200 years worth of rapes to get to “1 in 4”.

But then there’s that “95% of college rapes are never reported to authorities” statistic, so lets do more math.

Multiply 89,000 by 20, and you get 1.78 million. Now divide 39 million by that and you get 22.

That’s a much more reasonable number. However, I have never once seen the 95% unreported statistic before, and since it is completely unsourced, I’m skeptical as to its legitimacy.

Even more unnerving, is the fact that Mary Koss was involved in the report you linked. In another report done by Mary Koss, she wrote that “It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman.”

So do keep in mind that one of the sources for your link, is a very blatant rape apologist as well as a Feminist, giving your sources several forms of inherent bias.

Feel free to try again another time.

• Apr 13, 2014 10:56 pm
• dontneedfeminism
• 397 notes

• feminism
• rape
• rape statistics
• anti-feminism

[Editor's note: more on the terrifying Mary P. Koss ]

---

“IF the one-in-four statistic is correct—it is sometimes modified to “one-in-five to one-in-four”—campus rape represents a crime wave of unprecedented proportions.

No crime, much less one as serious as rape, has a victimization rate remotely approaching 20 or 25 percent, even over many years.

The 2006 violent crime rate in Detroit, one of the most violent cities in America, was 2,400 murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults per 100,000 inhabitants—a rate of 2.4 percent.

The one-in-four statistic would mean that every year, millions of young women graduate who have suffered the most terrifying assault, short of murder, that a woman can experience.

Such a crime wave would require nothing less than a state of emergency—Take Back the Night rallies and 24-hour hotlines would hardly be adequate to counter this tsunami of sexual violence. Admissions policies letting in tens of thousands of vicious criminals would require a complete revision, perhaps banning boys entirely.”
— Heather Mac Donald, "The Campus Rape Myth".


This alleged “statistic” was culled from a survey of 3,000 college women in 1982, conducted by Ms. Magazine. 

These women were asked only three questions:

1. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man gave you alcohol or drugs?
2. Have you had sexual intercourse when you didn’t want to because a man threatened or used some degree of physical force to make you?
3. Have you had sexual acts when you didn’t want to because a man threatened to use some degree of physical force to make you?

The trouble is, many of the women the survey counted as “victims” did not actually feel that they had been raped, especially not the entire third of the alleged “victims” that continued to have a consensual sexual relationship with their supposed attacker. 

Others that had consensual one-night-stands that they later regretted were also counted as “victims”.
When you have to lie about the prevalence of a crime, you’re not doing women any favors.
Feminism is supposed to be empowering, not to send us cowering.
Rape is not the “epidemic” that people are trying to claim it is.  It has actually decreased dramatically in the past few decades - up to 80% since 1979, despite an increase in the willingness of victims to report them. 

This is even further supported by data directly from the U.S. Bureau of Justice.

The only thing that HAS been increasing are FALSE reports of rape, which do a lot more harm to the lives of others than you may want to believe.
Third wave feminism is operating under far too many logical fallacies.  The Big Lie Technique is readily apparent in the use of the very “statistic” above which has time and again been proven to be false.

Overgeneralization continually tries to paint all men as monsters, when science has shown us that there are many psychological and biological factors that come into play to create someone with the potential to commit violence.

If you have to spread lies to support your cause, how much of a cause could you possibly have to begin with? 

And what are you saying about femininity itself when you want so badly for us to live in constant fear?

• How is this supposed to be encouraging women to be strong if all you let us aspire to is to be victims?
• How is this encouraging women to be independent if you try to make us believe that we can’t take care of ourselves?
• How are you helping women at all if you have to lie to us?

From http://tenaflyviper.tumblr.com/post/89186567115/if-the-one-in-four-statistic-is-correct-it-is

---

We persecute rape with more zeal than any other crime

1. Beyond reasonable doubt doesn’t apply to rape.
2. Feminists wish to slander accused names before convicted. 
3. Feminists against beyond reasonable doubt when it’s male rapists.
4. Feminist changes mind on rape culture when her son is falsely accused.
5. Universities strip basic rights from the accused. 
6. Change federal rules of evidence for men accused of rape.
7. Women sent man to jail, won millions, then discovered her claim was false. She asks to let bygones be bygones. Because she was worried about her money.
8. Boy accused of rape, found innocent, but committed suicide.
9. Innocent man urged to accept plea bargain.
10. Boy found innocent and killed by gang
11. Woman makes 11 false rape allegations.
12. Boy beaten to a pulp after being found innocent
13. Girlfriend cries rape when dad finds out about her BF, he gets murdered.
14. Mohammad Asif: “I keep thinking, ‘I just dropped her off, she was just a normal passenger, why has she done that?” -accused by said passenger of raping her at knifepoint - would be in jail except was exonerated by voice recording app on hsi phone.
15. Soner Yasa: four drunk women reported to police that he had sexually assaulted them as a ploy to refuse to pay a $13 cab fare- Once again he’d be in jail if not for video surveillance in his cab.  Over $13
16. A University’s Shame: How Brown betrayed one of its students
17. Park Si Hoo Is Cleared Of All Charges Stemming From Anti-Defamation Lawsuit Filed By The CEO Of His Former Talent Agency
18. False accusation will cost woman $55,000
19. Husband falsely accused of child rape wins $1.2 million from ex-spouse
20. The blogosphere is abuzz with controversy over a Beaverton, Oregon’s judge’s sentencing of a 19-year-old woman for filing false rape charges.
21. Man Awarded $852,000 in Civil Court After Ex-Wife Falsely Accuses Him of Sexual Abuse
22. The Aftermath of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case
23. http://www.davidcopperfieldsetstherecordstraight.com/
24. People exonerated after being falsely accused. 
25. Schoolboy, 16, died after he was falsely accused of raping a girl by mobs who terrorised his neighbourhood
26. Virginia Woman Falsely Accuses Man Of Rape And Sends Him Away For Four Years Before Recanting … Given Just 60 Days In Jail To Be Served On Weekends

And since I know this is only in reference to a rape culture toward women victims, how about the fact that men can be sued for not having sex, women use sex as bargaining chip, and people view women demanding sex as empowering?

Or the plethora of anti rape ads we have?

• In 1990, this anti-rape PSA aired.
• Another 90s anti-rape PSA that aired in Arizona.
• In 2013, this anti-rape PSA went viral.
• An anti-rape PSA in the UK.
• MTV ran a PSA against human trafficking.
• The United States Navy ran an anti-sexual assault PSA.
• In 1994, My So-Called Life’s pilot episode dealt with near date rape.
• In 2003, Dawson’s Creek dealt with attempted date rape.
• In 1996, Party of Five dealt with attempted date rape.
• In 1989, 21 Jump Street ran an episode where a female character who played a cop is raped.
• The popular TV show Degrassi ran this PSA before an episode dealing with sexual assault.
• Kurt Cobain explains that Nirvana’s song “Rape Me” is an anti-rape song.
• In 1991, Sublime released an anti-date rape song on their 40oz to Freedom single called “Date Rape”.
• In 1991, Tori Amos released a song about rape on her Little Earthquakes album called “Me and a Gun”.
• In 1993. Tupac released a song on his Strictly 4 My N.I.G.G.A.Z. album called “Keep Ya Head Up” questioning how men treat women, as he says, "Since we all came from a woman / Got our name from a woman and our game from a woman / I wonder why we take from our women / Why we rape our women, do we hate our women? / I think it’s time to kill for our women"
• In 2001, Aus-Rotten released a song on their The Rotten Agenda album called “The Second Rape” discussing rape and how the justice system deals with rape.
• In 2006, Cancerslug released a song called “Within Her Skin” about a rape victim who killed her rapist, bought a gun, and became a vigilante killing other rapists. This is reminiscent of serial killer Aileen Wuornos.
• In 2001, Immortal Technique released a haunting song on his Revolutionary Volume 1 album called “Dance with the Devil” about gang violence, drugs, and rape.
• Life Goes On in 1992 has an episode dealing with rape.
• Beverly Hills 90210 dealt with many issues like gay rights, animal rights, domestic violence and yes, date rape.
• In 1988, ABC ran an After School Special about date rape.
• Mark-Paul Gosselaar, better known as Zack from Saved by the Bell, appeared in a TV film addressing date rape.
• In 1995, the tv show Blossom ran an episode about date rape.
• In 1995, the film Higher Learning showed a scene where a college woman is raped. The rapist is later confronted by a group of men and forced to apologize while being outed as a sexual predator in front of his frat.
• In Kill Bill, the Bride is raped while in a coma, facilitated by Buck, a male nurse. When she awakens from her coma she bites off the tongue of her attacker, then murders Buck by slamming his head in the door of the hospital room. When I saw this in theaters, people cheered when she got revenge.
• In Cape Fear, the rapist character is portrayed as evil. In the 1962 film he is sent back to prison, in the 1991 film he is left to drown.
• In the 1996 film Eye for an Eye, the rapist is portrayed as evil and later killed for his crimes.
• In the 1972 film Deliverance, a man is raped by two hillbillies and later murdered for their crimes.
• In Last House on the Left, the rapists are portrayed as evil and later murdered for their crimes in both the 1972 film and 2009 film.
• In the 1971 film Dirty Harry, Clint Eastwood’s character Harry Callahan is quoted as saying,"Yeah, well, when an adult male is chasing a female with intent to commit rape, I shoot the bastard that’s my policy." 
• In the 1983 film Sudden Impact, Dirty Harry murders more rapists in the name of justice.
• In Straw Dogs, the rapists are portrayed as evil and murdered for their crimes in both the1971 film and 2011 film.
• In the 1995 film Braveheart, a man is allowed to enact revenge on a soldier who raped his wife. William Wallace also goes on a killing spree after his secret wife is executed for rejecting a soldier that was attempting to rape her.
• In the 2007 film Teeth, the lead character seeks out rapists in order to bite their dicks off with her vagina plus teeth.
• There are currently over 300 Law and Order: Special Victims Unit episodes, the majority of them portraying rapists as only men.
• The NO EXCUSES campaign was started in 2011 addressing issues like rape in the military.
• The Onion satirized the media coverage of the Steubenville rape with this video that aired on Comedy Central.

Rape is no where near as common as feminists make it out to be.

1 in 5 is bullshit.

Most feminists backed studies are bullshit.

Rape culture is bullshit. and stats prove it.

Anywhere from 97-8% of rape claims are false.

1-12 also bullshit.

Just how many men are rapists?

RAINN disses rape culture.

Campus rape myth

From http://durkin62.tumblr.com/post/92961424662/hahahaha-did-they-really-just-link-you-to-a-tumblr-text