Friday, 18 October 2013

Gender wage gap and STEM links

EU to ban antifeminist speech

"“Group libel” means: defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group as defined in paragraph (a) – or members thereof – with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges."

So ridiculing feminism is a crime? People ridicule political movements they oppose all the time; why is feminism so privileged that it cannot even be criticised?

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf – The European framework national statute for the promotion of tolerance – full text (in English)

And since when did feminism prove it's points? Is the Patriarchy Hypothesis something that's ever been subjected to rigorous examination?

Well, it can't be after this is passed. That would be "subjecting it to false charges". Charging it with being wrong, or actively deceitful.

So who gets to decide what's a true charge and what's false? It does.

Judge, jury and executioner all in one.

Discussion here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/suggested-reading/eu-to-ban-anti-feminist-speech/

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Amazon et al promise to purge filth from the world...

Retailer Amazon has removed several abuse-themed e-books from its Kindle Store after a report highlighted titles depicting rape, incest and bestiality.

So... I wonder if they'll go after this book?

Genesis 4:16-17

And Cain went out from the face of the Lord, and dwelt as a fugitive on the earth, at the east side of Eden. And Cain knew his wife, and she conceived, and brought forth Henoch: and he built a city, and called the name thereof by the name of his son Henoch. -

Genesis 20:12-13
Howbeit, otherwise also she is truly my sister, the daughter of my father, and not the daughter of my mother, and I took her to wife. And after God brought me out of my father’s house, I said to her: Thou shalt do me this kindness: In every place, to which we shall come, thou shalt say that I am thy brother.

Genesis 11:26-29
And Thare lived seventy years, and begot Abram, and Nachor, and Aran. And these are the generations of Thare: Thare begot Abram, Nachor, and Aran. And Aran begot Lot. And Aran died before Thare his father, in the land of his nativity in Ur of the Chaldees. And Abram and Nachor married wives: the name of Abram’s wife was Sarai: and the name of Nachor’s wife, Melcha, the daughter of Aran, father of Melcha, and father of Jescha. -

Genesis 19:31-36
And the elder said to the younger Our father is old, and there is no man left on the earth, to come in unto us after the manner of the whole earth. Come, let us make him drunk with wine, and let us lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the elder went in and lay with her father: but he perceived not neither when his daughter lay down, nor when she rose up.

And the next day the elder said to the younger: Behold I lay last night with my father, let us make him drink wine also to night, and thou shalt lie with him, that we may save seed of our father. They made their father drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in, and lay with him: and neither then did he perceive when she lay down, nor when she rose up. So the two daughters of Lot were with child by their father.

Exodus 6:19-20

The sons of Merari: Moholi and Musi. These are the kindreds of Levi by their families. 20 And Amram took to wife Jochabed his aunt by the father’s side: and she bore him Aaron and Moses. And the years of Amram’s life were a hundred and thirty-seven.

II Kings 13:12-14

And Thamar came to the house of Amnon her brother: but he was laid down: and she took meal and tempered it: and dissolving it in his sight she made little messes. And taking what she had boiled, she poured it out, and set it before him, but he would not eat: and Amnon said: Put out all persons from me.

And when they had put all persons out, Amnon said to Thamar: Bring the mess into the chamber, that I may eat at thy hand. And when she had presented him the meat, he took hold of her, and said: Come lie with me, my sister. She answered him: Do not so, my brother, do not force me: for no such thing must be done in Israel. Do not thou this folly. But he would not hearken to her prayers, but being stronger overpowered her and lay with her.

No?

Didn't think so.

The fact is literature is jam-packed with stuff that we wouldn't want done in real life. Horrific murders are par for the course in most popular books, and yet the readers haven't yet turned into a horde of psychopaths.

In our thoughts, we can be free to do anything at all, no matter how appalling - because it doesn't hurt anyone, and harming someone should be the basis of moral laws.

If no harm is done, don't worry about it; a thought is not a deed.

Only a few companies control most of the ebooks in the world, and thanks to the fact they lease, not sell, they can recall those books and erase them with impunity.

They won't act against something like the Bible - they wouldn't dare - but if they can censor perfectly legal books like this, you can be damn sure they can do the same with other books, perhaps a little too critical of a sponsor or a government they like.

Can another publisher be found, one with better free speech policies? Or is the stranglehold on ebooks they hold too strong?

Time will tell, and there's a heavy price if we get it wrong.

Sunday, 13 October 2013

Why I Need Men's Rights

Oratorasaurus' quick answer

My answer?

https://fabiusmaximus.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/lady-justice-1.jpg

Well, I'm an egalitarian and an MRA. I want a world without double standards.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale
, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZAuqkqxk9A, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/why-are-there-such-double-standards.html

http://cdn.bleedingcool.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/i6-600x467.png

Did you know that female rape is legally erased by the clever use of definitions?

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/rape-erasure-blog-reblogged.html

RAINN uses the dodgy definition and is endlessly quoted as evidence of the perversity of men. At the same time, women get lighter sentences and are coddled by the media for acts of sexual perversity http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/female-pedophiles-get-weekend-detention.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/lesbians-need-to-be-taught-not-to-rape.html

In India, recently, the definition of rape was legally changed to mean no woman could be charged with it. http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/a-sad-day-for-male-rape-victims-in-india/
https://archive.is/jaJRz 6 May 2015 03:36:54 UTC

In Israel, feminists agitated to make sure the immunity remained on the books there. http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape
https://archive.is/SkIjG 8 Aug 2015 11:34:52 UTC

The ratio of rape victims is actually pretty close to 1:1 for male and females. http://www.genderratic.com/p/836/manufacturing-female-victimhood-and-marginalizing-vulnerable-men/

I want legal equality, which means that if there's a domestic dispute, my sex isn't an issue (and it is in the US, the arrest guidelines are to arrest 1 party, and it's the taller one, which usually means the man). http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/primary-or-predominant-aggressor-laws.html

I want to know I'm relatively safe when I have sex that I won't have a false accusation of rape (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/false-rape-accusations.html)..

..that if i'm drunk and they're drunk, and the law says drunk people can't consent, either we both should be charged - or neither. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/08/women-cannot-consent-because-they-are.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/consent-continued.html

I want to know my life is as valued as a woman's. When i look at the money invested in breast cancer vs prostate cancer, or in domestic violence shelters, or the opposition to universal, rather than male-only conscription, I don't see it at all. Men are disposable.

https://mrmilitantnegro.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/domestic-violence-stats.jpg?w=750

Going from the imagery google presents, females perpetrating DV is non-existent.

Almost all police and governmental campaigns show
heterosexual relationships,
male perp,
female victim
- even when a woman massacred her seven kids and her niece.
Or eight of her own children.

I've talked to criminologists who claimed there were NO cases of DV where a woman was at fault. None.

I know first hand that's only happening because they ignore them. Legal support is gender specific. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/why-dont-men-in-australia-get-same-path.html

I'm hoping my friend has a better outcome, but i can tell you that even with voice recordings of threats, he still couldn't get an AVO - police protection from his ex - and she still shares custody despite a history of violence. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/men-in-sweden-are-at-least-as-likely.html

I want Men’s reproductive rights

    Right to know one is, or will be a father.
    Right to Legal Paternal Surrender.
    Right to Ownership of Person (i.e. semen, c.f. Woman Used Sperm From Oral Sex To Get Pregnant, Gets Child Support for example).

Right to know you’re a father, right to determine you’re not ready to be a father, and right to prosecute those who misuse your semen to their own ends.

I never, ever want to see a headline like this again, but I know I will because men and male sexuality is demonised now, men are seen as filthy rape monsters, barely restrained but always close to the edge . http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/boy-15-kills-himself-after-facing.html

I want to see an end to the Duluth model (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/tthe-duluth-model-of-misandry.html), which says that only women should be parents, and which was instituted by feminists.

It's the reason men are so bitter about child custody. It's resulted in situations where a woman can rape a child - then demand payments for the offspring. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/a-12-year-old-boy-can-be-raped-then.html

http://wrcb.images.worldnow.com/images/21426096_SA.jpg

Woman, 18, charged with boy's rape at church

https://riversong.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/mens-rights-are-hr-hoeberth1.jpg

In my country, aboriginal men are arrested for possessing pornography that is perfectly legal for anyone else... the belief that male sexuality is dangerous, and that our masturbation aids must be destroyed, our penises mutilated, our gaze lowered, and all sexual advances prohibited, is a weird combination of christian and feminist beliefs.

We live in a time when men are forever told they are unwanted - "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" - "my vibrator is better than your body!"

I cannot imagine a woman would ever hear the equivalent of those statements.

I remember when men could feel pride, could feel desired, and were willing to fight and die for this country.

Most young men now seem somewhat ashamed of being born. Or they radicalise, either becoming MRAs, or religious fanatics. Religion offers self-worth to men -put at a terrible price. Look at the young men in the US who became muslim terrorists - why do you think they found that lethal ideology appealing?

I have to wonder, when men are taught they are worthless.. why should they put their neck on the line for women? Why should they have to die to protect a system that claims they are useless? Why should any man be intimate with a woman who says he is unwanted? Or who at least, doesn't oppose her Sisters who claim he is?

Finally, we live in a time when my speech - my opposition to feminism - looks like it will become a crime in some countries like Sweden, a ban which looks to be spreading- and such speech -which i hope you will agree is nonviolent - has been used to ban youtube and other social media accounts.

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/should-laws-be-passed-to-suppress.html Violence is being used to stifle the expression of people like me.

So even if you don't believe a single word of anything I have said, ask yourself this:

What violence have MRA groups done?

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nvYyGTmcP80/maxresdefault.jpg

https://youtu.be/FWxAljFlb-c

What violence is being done to MRAs?

Isn't opposing that violence and allowing free speech the reason we fought against the fascists in WW2? The reason that millions of people died, and yet we still counted that sacrifice as worthwhile? Will it all have been in vain?

Men and women... are people. No better, no worse. Fellow travellers on the road of humanity, equal sharers of the land and sky. That is the single truth of Men's Rights. And that is why you need it too.

Saturday, 12 October 2013

The Nonconsensual Sexualization of the Sexual Sexosystemssssss

From Antifeminist Egalitarian

27th Aug 2013 | 5,315 notes
misandry-mermaid:

“Let’s say a woman is trying to be seductive. What the hell makes you think you’re the one she’s trying to seduce? And if you aren’t, what the hell makes you think you have any right to shove yourself into her business?

Your thoughts are your own: you are free to notice her, think about her, fantasize, etc.–you are not free to involve her, through actions or words that disclose what’s going on in your pants, unless she specifically consents and makes it clear.

It astonishes me to no end that men have a problem with this. A lot of guys wouldn’t appreciate being hit on by someone they’re not interested in–but they expect women to accept it.”
— Nahida S.N., The Nonconsensual Sexualization of Unintending Young Women (via cyberteeth)

Let’s say every person in the world believes this. Let’s say one of those people, a woman, is trying to be seductive. None of the men or women around her can be sure who she’s trying to seduce, so none of them approach her.

Eventually she decides that she will just have to approach the man she’s trying to seduce. She does, and she starts to flirt with him.

He is outraged. “How dare you approach me?! Does it look like I’m trying to seduce you?! I’m just trying to have a beer with some friends!” He looks her up and down. “I might have been interested in you, if you hadn’t actually approached me and made it clear that your were interested in me! Get away from me you pervert!”

All of the man’s friends echo his sentiments, and a security guard, noticing the hubbub, swiftly removes the seductive woman from the premises. “If you’re going to incite disorderly behaviour with such inappropriate sexual innuendo, you’re not welcome here.”

All across the world men and women alike are having similar experiences to the seductive woman. Sex is extremely rare, but everybody wanks a lot while having fantasies about each other. Politicians are panicking because reproduction has all but ceased, and birth rates are plummeting. Eventually, the human race becomes extinct.

In the last moments of her life, the last human alive thinks to herself, probably in Chinese, “why did feminists have to be offended by ordinary human social interactions?”

Boy, 15, kills himself after 'facing expulsion and being put on sex offender registry' for streaking

Boy, 15, kills himself after 'facing expulsion and being put on sex offender registry' for streaking

He was wearing a sock.. you know who also did that?

Were they arrested, branded for life?

Of course not.

"He was arrested and school district recommended he face a court hearing
If convicted of indecent exposure, he'd have gone on sex offenders list"

The sex offenders list... for streaking?

He'd have been regarded as unsafe to be near children and denied a lot of work.

A creep, a pervert, a rapist.

I grew up when streaking regularly happened at sporting events. People would laugh, or see it as a nuisance, but they didn't feel damaged.

He'd have been marked for life. For doing something we used to regard as a silly prank, or even a political protest. The sex offenders list. Did what they propose fit the crime?

Isn't that what punishment is supposed to do?

In 1973, what the press called a "streaking epidemic" hit Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches, Texas, with streakers being seen in residence halls, at football games and at various other on-campus locations and events, including Spring graduation.

The trend continued until spring 1974, when Ralph W. Steen, University president, hoping to end the streaking fad, designated a day to streak the length of East College Street, a tradition that - with a few breaks - has continued to this day. (source)

I have to wonder.. would he have been treated as harshly if he'd been a she? Or would it have been seen as a bit of a joke?

Oh, right..

Friday, 11 October 2013

Chanting RAPE CULTURE RAPE CULTURE RAPE CULTURE does not make it real

Rape culture, in the west, is a myth. If there was any truth to it, then the boys wouldn't have been punished.

Well, it's a myth to an extent... when women rape, it's not even acknowledged as such by the FBI. It's not even counted as a crime in many countries thanks to changes made by Feminists recently.

Even in Israel.

Even in the UK!

When women rape, they ARE coddled, excuses are made by the media, Feminists and even judges, their childhood investigated to find out who victimised them into doing such an unnatural thing.

Their sentences, when they are convicted, are shorter. Their prison conditions.. better. Baroness Corston dedicated her life to closing women's prisons, because the poor dears don't deserve to be punished, not like those filthy men.

And in rape trials men are guilty unless proven innocent, despite false allegations ranging up to 90%.

So what do I see here? I see a woman so smug in her self-entitlement and professional victimhood that she is happy to rage males for a system that punishes males for an act universally condemned ... by males. That refuses to acknowledge female on female rape can possibly even exist, let alone be common.

I see a man so lost in internalised misandry that he will fight to the death to protect a woman's right to rape without consequence, or accuse him of rape without evidence.

These people chant their dogma, hoping you will believe, oh yea! - believe, brothers and sisters!

Well, here's something I ask you to try instead.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/05/08/article-0-19AC00B7000005DC-789_634x754.jpg

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)