NSFW: Feminists proclaim: Female porn good! Male porn bad! Because raisins!

It's only bad if men do it.

Update:

There's a very good reason Feminists love to call men fuckboys.
They drool over the fantasy of raping masculinity,
and individual men in some cases..
(source)

One of the central claims of the article below is that women prefer to see female nudity over male. If that's the case, why do Feminists demand that shows like Game of Thrones feature equal amounts of male and female nudity?

Each scene of male nudity costs money to make, and will cost the audience of anyone who doesn't like dicks - which according to the article, is... practically everyone!

It also has special dangers - an erection can get them shut down but female sexual arousal is invisible.

So why do Feminists demand it if their own evidence means it's a terrible idea?

Because they can. Because bullying people into obeying their whims is what they do, and the more society defers to the professional Damsels in Distress, the more broken it becomes and the easier it is to make them even more submissive.


 https://archive.is/NxXAU

The Article:

A Response to "Male Porn is bad! Porna is better - because for women! Buy it with all yr monies!!" by the Sydney Morning Herald (former newspaper).

http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/life/family-relationships-and-sex/porna-is-here--with-women-as-subjects-not-objects-20160418-go8z5b.html

26 Apr 2016 12:13:22 UTC

I used to read the Sydney Morning Herald, but the collapse of print journalism means any old idiot can write for them nowadays.

Recent research [unreferenced] has revealed that women are increasingly becoming consumers of online porn [almost impossible to check, so citation needed], and feminist pornographers are taking more control [huge citation needed] in an industry which has traditionally focused on satisfying men's needs [it's been focussed on giving stuff to people with money - and the majority willing to pay for any sort of sexwork has always been men, and the author hasn't bothered providing evidence].

Feminists have been pushing this feminist pr0n bullshit for decades. They want male porn to be illegal, but female porn is strong and empowering.


The sexism and doublethink required to hold those beliefs is truly impressive.

I thought I'd show real porn made by women, or at least a woman I know. I've seen a shitload of female produced porn, and the secret is... it's the same as male produced porn. It has BDSM, women being hurt, even raped, even killed - if anything, it's more extreme than the male stuff.


Salanica the Elfkin.- A NSFW artist!

A nice person with a filthy mind who hasn't paid me to advertise this, alas.

http://sarahsalanica.tumblr.com/post/143226727175/nsfw-page-36-of-cant-buy-love-so-close-to

This porn is messy, funny, intimate, and involves a woman being degraded for the pleasure of the viewer.

GASP!

"Burrrrn it!!!", the Feminist hisses.

Sane Person: "But it was produced by a woman?"

Feminist: "Oh.. a woman, how empowered it is, oh yeah, (*schlick schlick schlick*)

"Sex is messy, funny, impulsive and intimate"

Rubbish. Are they going to slut-shame women whose sex isn't - for example in BDSM, where things may be planned and serious?


Are they going to slut shame women who have casual sex, which is often not intimate, and may not involve a woman wanting to see their partner for more than that?


Of course not. Feminists only shame male desire. It's what they *do*.

"porn is none of the above"

Sorry, what?

According to Feminism, THIS NEVER HAPPENS.
(source)

This person has never heard of messy porn? Wow. Ok. They haven't actually seen any of it, have they? Typical Feminist, doesn't want to get the purity of their ideology contaminated with facts.



I thought about proving this wrong, but I really am not keen on most of that stuff. The Feminist idea that women don't like it is hilarious - what women get off on sometimes makes me want to hide under my bed, quite frankly!


As for funny porn - parody porn titles are par for the course

Matty Silver couldn't be bothered doing the 1 second it took to check her facts. "There is no Humour in Porn". She said that, Listened and Believed, and it was true, and her audience will lap it up like the gullible yet dangerous idiots they are.

... and an awful lot of image porn is a joke.

Anyone who has ever looked at old Playboys knows they ALWAYS had combinations of humour and erotica in their cartoons.

"Pornhub, visited by about 150 million people every month, has revealed that women make up a quarter of its global audience" ... who apparently have no problem with the porn you seem to think disgusts these Damsels in Distress.

Maybe... just maybe... hear me out here... maybe they don't need rescuing by Feminism?

"Sex is, or should be, preceded by enthusiastic consent"

Why? Why do we have to follow your rules, you fuck? Sane people are perfectly capable of figuring out consent and often give it until it is explicitly withheld; if my partner kisses me in my sleep and I wake up to her going down on me, then I have this wonderful word I can use if it's unacceptable.

We adults call it "no".

Feminists can't seem to grasp it. Maybe it's because they just don't fuck enough.



"discussions of STI protection and contraceptives; porn has none of that"

According to Feminists, this is what you should be focussing on when you feel horny.

Gosh, I wonder why? Could it be because fiction is not real? Could that be it, you bloody moron?

We don't need discussions on your genital warts in our wank-fodder, Matty. Ok, some people might get off on it, but it's a niche market.

We also don't get lectures on gun discipline in action flicks either!

WE KNOW IT'S NOT REAL. WHY DO YOU NOT?

Ok, the rest of the article reads like an ad for one of the porn companies, and I have to wonder if there's not an undisclosed relationship going on here. I get it, she's plugging her business as well, but .. did they just buy her a large lunch, or was more involved?

How much did it take to spread her metaphorical legs and get her to lie back and think of the Queen... not doing anything nasty because that's male porn, oh, that would be bad, baaad, I've been such a bad girl, punish me Queenie, oh!!!

Further Reading:

Why feminists are so down on sex

Feminists outlaw the use of sex-workers

What harm do Feminists do to men - and to other women?

Olivier Donnars—AP Sex workers and supporters protest near the French National Assembly in Paris on April 6, 2016, as French lawmakers take part in a final debate on a bill that would make it illegal to pay for sex

Sex workers can't work without clients. How the hell does arresting the men (and only the men!) help put food on their table?

Feminists don't harm men with their own hands - they prefer to use the State for that. They criminalise the clients of sex-workers, whilst shouting "free the nipple" and teaching children that sex is empowering.

Emma prepares herself for bell hook's strap-on.

Feminists love to call themselves and others "cunts", yet if any man uses that word, they will have them destroyed(source)

What they mean, of course, is sex is empowering FOR WOMEN.

But this is a lie - there's no giving to men in their model of the world.

Or rather, for the right sort of women - the ones who like submissive, terrified men, or who are gay.

That gay women like BDSM, porn, and sex workers just as much as straight is one of those dirty secrets that is swept under the rug.










When Emma does sex work, Feminists say it is good.

When men pay for sex work, Feminists say they are evil.

What sort of doublethink makes that possible?
So what is Emma Watson's “awesome alternative” to pornography? A website that  focuses on “clitoral stimulation, and not penetration.”

Emma poses for photography that is designed to sexually titillate men,
and she does so in exchange for money.

Men are supposed to pay money to Feminists to learn how to service women without any pleasure for themselves.


This is how they see men - as tainted, born corrupt - but still useful as disposable servants.

For men, they have introduced new consent laws that mean a man must beg constantly throughout intercourse for permission to continue, that mean if a man and a woman drink champagne and consummate their wedding, then the man and only the man can be charged with rape.

They want to teach children that heterosexuality is abnormal and have them look at gay sex sites - yet they want to end all porn for straight men and criminalise BDSM.

Emma acts in movies that are designed to sexually titillate men,

and she does so in exchange for money.

What does that tell you about their attitude towards men, and to the women that desire them?

Not every woman wants a slave begging them permission to touch their bodies throughout the sexual act. Most women have no problem with sharing a drink with their man. And some women will always feel frustrated if they can't be allowed to be submissive to a man.

Feminism as a movement just cannot cope with those women, and hurts them as collateral damage in their war on men.

BDSM and sex-work are something that lesbians pursue as well(source)

When Feminists have her lover arrested, how do you think she will feel?
Do they really know better than her how to live her life?

(source: unknown)

Update10th April 2016:

Feminists criminalise sexwork, then claim the evil GamerGate must have done it.
And it ate their homework as well.

And what do real members of that hashtag say?

"There's nothing wrong with being an escort. If Alison Rapp wants to make $250 an hour plus through sexual services, that's her choice. I'm not going to, and neither should you, make this about the fact that she was an escort."

https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/4e4598/discussion_drama_it_is_confirmed_that_alison_rapp/

From more on Ms Rapp, read this.

I have to wonder - do you think Feminists will be calling for the arrests of the women hiring strippers (and then fucking them)? Of course not!


(Note: I've heard stories about hen's nights since I was a kid, from women, and I seriously would never want a relationship with a woman who wanted one - the worst was a bride who caught herpes from the stripper, then gave it to the groom, then divorced him and got everything. :P

SocJus College claims male gratification is wickedness & sin

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/melbourne-university-porn-ban-angers-ormond-college-students-20150904-gjfqys.html

The college functions according to feminist beliefs - pretty much like a Catholic or a Muslim college would - but they don't advertise. Feminism is so much a part of the system that questioning it is simply impossible for them.

 "even same-sex pornography was treating another person as a means to an end"

Like going to a shop and buying a loaf of bread is, yes. My end is food. Their end is the money I have.

We exchange it.

Welcome to capitalism - no, not even that, welcome to a pattern of behaviour that even pre-dates humanity.



I have no idea how feminist economics works. Perhaps they just think they can stand about screeching until the Patriarchy gives them stuff.



Actually, I think that's pretty much it. They want to destroy Patriarchy - and feed off it at the same time.


And that's ignoring the giant amount of porn that's simply amateurs taking pictures of themselves and uploading it in return for the admiration of others - a quantity I suspect far outweighs the commercial market now.

Dr Black said the porn ban was not prompted by student complaints but was informed by a "well-held view that pornography depicts women for the gratification of male sexuality".

Really? Outside of Feminism, who, exactly, believes that? Inside of feminism - there's an entire branch of feminism that holds that such activities are GOOD!


And what the hell is wrong with the gratification of male sexuality? I mean, does he propose students hands be tied and their underwear monitored, like was done in Victorian times, to prevent self-pleasuring? Oh, only male students, I forget.

What Dr Black means is that every time a male experiences release, a female is damaged. Presumably magic sperm monkeys fly out and slash away at her innocence and purity.


"We're not in any way restricting their ability to do what they want with their own personal resources "

Except they are paying for wifi. In the same way they are paying for electricity and water and space. If the wifi is a common resource, so too is the light from the bulbs... will the college monitor that as well, in case it be used for the horrible sin of simply illuminating a female body for male gratification?

A man is about to pleasure himself by looking at a tattered paper copy of Playboy - when there's a hard knock at the door. Who could it be?

Oh no! It's the Sex Police!! Flee!




Oh, heavens!

Hold the Press! You Must Hear This!

I love smut

It's crazy, sexy, and sometimes gross!

Vintage Sleaze

The True and Untold History of Smut in America by Jim Linderman. Low Art goes HIGH Art. A True Story every day.