Why do Feminists hate Truth?

To understand why critics of Feminism say it is a hate movement, I refer you to the following:

Brainstorming

A reply to a Feminist, who insists, despite all evidence to the contrary, that feminists don't hate men.

Here was my original dialogue.

Feminist: "Feminism: great for women... also great for men!"

Sane Person: "Uh huh. So when you disrupted a conference on male suicide by pulling fire alarms, singing "Cry Me a River" and offering to collect the male tears of the brothers and sons of the dead, how was that helping men?"

Feminist: "The fact that you question Feminism is the reason we need Feminism!"

Sane Person: "That's a deflection. Why don't you answer the question?"

Feminist: "Why do you hate women?"

Sane Person: "That's another..."

Feminist: "I bet it because you can't get laid!"

Sane Person: "Will you focus on the issues?"

Feminist: "Pathetic man-baby! Cry me some male tears why doncha, man-baby?"

Sane Person: "Ok, you aren't interested in anything beyond abuse, and we're done" (*leaves*)

Feminist: "Hey! Hey! Did you all see that? He was trying to rape me! Donations pls!"


(Full quote from the feminist in question is far below.)She replied, and my response to that continues from here.

https://www.facebook.com/HuffPostWomen/videos/vb.153213781413350/1065980990136620/?type=2&theater&notif_t=video_reply&notif_id=1468392097080825

"Sorry but no, I completely disagree."



Of course you do - you don't care about evaluating new information that conflicts with your ideology.



"You're telling me that I'm not right to tell someone to settle down"

As I said, Feminists would have sworn at you historically if you'd tried that on them. Who are you to decide which emotions others may experience? Why is it you don't object to angry feminists?


" as though that's logical?"

You've completely ignored all evidence we have presented... but now you care about logic?


"the things you are saying are based on misinformation from hate groups. "


You have provided no evidence to back up anything you believe, and dismiss all the evidence you don't like on the grounds that it must be from bad people.


Jess Phillips, the Labour MP for Birmingham Yardley, angrily dismissed the idea of having a parliamentary debate on issues affecting men, and laughed at male suicide rates. (source)

She then called for male critics of Feminism to be arrested. (source)

This person has enormous political power, is supported by Feminists in the name of Feminism, and wants to introduce laws straight out of 1984, and you insist Feminism didna doo nuffin'.

"Feminism is not a hate group. "

And yet it invented the concept of toxic masculinity, without any correspondent toxic femininity. And it's easy, through word association, to establish feminists hate men.

They never talk about positive qualities of men unless they are filtering their words - when they freely associate, they will use negative terms only for men, who are seen as The Other... and they will only use positive terms for their In Group, i.e. women.

Feminists hate boys

This has been tested over and over.

Feminism is the doctrine of hatred of men and boys.

It's the hatred of PEOPLE.


But feminists are no longer able to see men and boys as people.

Which is why, in Australia, it's legal to pay men less per hour for identical work - men were legally re-classified by the Australian Human Rights Commission - controlled by feminists like Gillard - as not BEING HUMAN.

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2015/09/men-are-not-regarded-as-human-thanks-to.html


"The feminists who commented on this page said they don't hate men"

"Your argument is wrong, because of your race". Tell me again how Feminists aren't racist?

Talk is cheap. Lots of neo-nazis say they don't hate other racists. We care about deeds. We look  at feminists writing laws that protect female rapists, that make innocent behaviour such as the act of sharing champagne with your bride on your wedding night into a crime.

- we look at feminists calling for Sexual Segregation, for special treatment, for more and more resources to be spent on one sex than the other... 

...and we know that all the fine words don't make a damn bit of difference compared to WHAT YOU ARE DOING.



" I volunteer four times a month "

Which proves what?

" you're claiming I'm a nazi [sic]"

No. There are very few Nazis remaining on this planet. I'm claiming you are a fascist, yes, but your focus is on the hatred of men and boys, not on Jews and Gypsies.

And Feminism is far more subtle than Nazism ever was - but far more bold about wanting a genocide.

Feminists constantly talk about exterminating men - but in the end, they try to persuade us to murder ourselves instead. They laugh, and sing with joy, at male suicides. Do you have any idea who Big Red even is?



The thing about the Nazis is - they thought they were good people too.



"Saying I'm not allowed to say"

You're allowed to say what you want - in fact, as Facebook has shown, Feminists can freely call me a "white c*nt" and they will turn a blind eye to it, because they have that area run by and for Feminists.

But there's a difference between ALLOWED and JUSTIFIED that you seem incapable of grasping. You will not honestly deal with us - then you are offended when we call you out on it? Boo hoo! I don't care about your Feelz.

" Comments on this thread, saying things that females attempt suicide only for attention shows hate."


No, it shows reason. Death is easy. Do you think men are more competent than women? That women can't kill themselves properly because they are stupid? When men try to die, they succeed. Women cut themselves a little, then call for help, or they swallow pills that won't kill them for hours and sit in a place where they will likely be found.

And it works - women get far more resources proportionally. Feminists make damned sure of it.


In fact, when women's suicide rose a little to the rate of men, it was classed as a disaster... for women.

The concept of treating people equally regardless of their sex is impossible for feminists.


" When every feminist blog I've looked at discussed protecting rape victims both male and female" ... yet ignores the feminists writing laws that grant female rapists immunity to prosecution - yeah, so what if the blogs you read confirm your biases?


You just "no tru feminist!" the ones you don't like.

You aren't going to read new information, so I'm going to post this up in case others read it one day.
 I do not believe you are honest, and further discussion with *you* is pointless - but should anyone else have a desire to know more, the information is there, or I can provide it on request.

"discusses why consent is important"

Two people share a glass of wine and then have sex. Which of them raped the other? Thanks to feminists, legally, they are both rapists and they are both rape victims - but we know feminists will always ask "well, which was the man?"

Feminists don't care about consent, they care about harming men. Sane people are capable of ongoing consent - we don't suddenly decide that our taxi driver must have kidnapped us because they didn't ask if we still wanted to be driven every minute on the minute.


"why men and women should be paid the same for the same quality of work"

As I pointed out before, FEMINISTS HAVE DONE THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THIS.

Feminists APPLAUDED the legal decision to pay men less per hour for identical work on the grounds that women deserve more because vagina.

That's a fact. But you don't care about the facts. You doublethink your way around them.


"why pro-choice is important"

Are you copying and pasting from some feminist list of grievances now? Abortion is a different topic - nice derailment attempt! And you wonder why we think you are dishonest.


" why harassment is wrong"

You feminists class everything a man says to a woman as harassment. "Good evening" was counted in a feminist video on the subject - one very popular with feminists. They didn't object to that shifting of the goal posts.


"why it's okay for guys to be sensitive"

Randi Harper was then called to the UN to speak on behalf of Feminists,
for a conference on how terribly harassed women are.
Talk about putting a fox in charge of a hen house!

... this from the movement that created a meme of "male tears" and "masculinity so fragile".

You hypocrite!

"how it's important to defend against homophobia"

Recently, feminists classed gay men as "privileged". Feminists applauded as gay men were arrested in the 1970s, and they do their damnedest to silence gay men like Milo when he says the things they don't like. When feminists march on to the platform of gay men and grab the microphone and tell the gay men that they are not allowed to talk, then I have to take your claims as being utterly worthless.


" transphobia"


Hahaha. TERF. Look it up. Feminists celebrate hating transgender women. There's a good reason people like Blaire White oppose you.



"racism"

Feminists routinely denounce white people - they even claim they can't be racist against white people.They write themselves a permission slip for violent behaviour.

When feminists call other people "WHITE c*nts", it's because they are racist, and because other Feminists are racist, and because they have the power to be racist with impunity. They enable each other's bigotry. That's a choice.



You, as a Feminist, are responsible for what is being done in your name. Instead, you persist in making excuses that result in people being murdered.

" I am absolutely certain it's not a hate group."

You are absolutely certain despite contrary evidence you never evaluate. You are a close-minded ideologue.

"If haters exist, I can't control them"

Yes, you can. You can stop supporting them.

When Dworkin was put in charge of teaching feminism to millions of students, feminists didn't object. They applauded. They made a choice. Don't give me that rubbish about being powerless.



" anymore than you can control groups like RotK"

... a group that has absolutely no connection to men's rights, and despises MRAs to boot. Why the hell would you think that was analogous? Are you an idiot?

" the difference is I'm not claiming that you must hate women "

Feminists call their opponents misogynists all the time. It's a standard tactic. In fact, Gillard even had the dictionary definition re-written after an argument with her opposition fell apart because they weren't using the Feminist definition.

We are at war with Eastasia. We have always been at war with Eastasia.

"When I see other feminists who work humanitarian jobs and volunteer, I don't see hate."

When the Nazis saw smoke blowing in from the ovens, they didn't see hate either. They made sure they thought about other things. They might not have killed Jews in person - but blood was on their hands nevertheless.



"Saying I need to address every radical while the majority are against hate is irrational."

Your claim that the majority is against hate has no evidence to back it up - and plenty of evidence against it.You don't oppose the radicals in any case - any of them. You just say you do.

And I'm done arguing with a fanatic who wouldn't know an honest thought if it smacked her in the face.

---

 Yes, they used the "Wall of Text" and "Gish Gallop" to boot.

Brett Caton Sorry but no, I completely disagree. You're telling me that I'm not right to tell someone to settle down and stop raging and throwing out random insults, as though that's logical? It's not. And the things you are saying are based on misinformation from hate groups. Feminism is not a hate group. The feminists who commented on this page said they don't hate men, and you respond by calling them liars, which matches my point perfectly. I volunteer four times a month and you're claiming I'm a nazi which again shows hate. Saying I'm not allowed to say I shouldn't have insults thrown at me shows hate. Comments on this thread, saying things that females attempt suicide only for attention shows hate. When every feminist blog I've looked at discussed protecting rape victims both male and female, discusses why consent is important, why men and women should be paid the same for the same quality of work, why pro-choice is important, why harassment is wrong, why it's okay for guys to be sensitive, how it's important to defend against homophobia, transphobia and racism I am absolutely certain it's not a hate group. If haters exist, I can't control them anymore than you can control groups like RotK, the difference is I'm not claiming that you must hate women because of all the anti-feminists out there who despise women, homosexuals and men who express feelings other than rage. When I see other feminists who work humanitarian jobs and volunteer, I don't see hate. The anti-feminist comments on this thread though? Different story. Saying I need to address every radical while the majority are against hate is irrational. The majority of anti-feminism I see is hateful though and I've looked at both sides, whereas you seem to only get your sources from one. You can cry and play the victim and pretend that warping an ideology around is somehow making a difference but in the end, I'm completely right. You can say that it's okay for men to express rage and aggression at others who disagree without being told to settle down, while saying feminists are hateful, but it only shows you as a hypocrite. I don't agree with hypocrites.

---

Further reading

Cat-Calling is (Now) a Crime

If you think all feminism is doing is voicing opinions you haven’t been paying the fuck attention.

Reblogged from
http://durkin62.tumblr.com/post/87242261442/but-what-the-fuck-is-a-radical-feminist-if-woman


  cacklewhore asked:

But what the fuck is a radical feminist...? If woman uses a little power to get her opinions heard (which have been completely disregarded by stupid sexist men like you) they suddenly become radical and irrational?? Wow. I'm ashamed to live in a world with such ignorant ass people.

durkin62 answered:

The feeling is mutual I assure you. If you think all feminism is doing is voicing opinions you haven’t been paying the fuck attention.

1. Feminists threaten to kill woman for saying men need abuse shelters.
2. Feminists prevent a meeting about male suicide.
3. Feminists stage mock murders to scare men. 
4. Feminist attacks male cartoonist and is hailed a hero of feminism.
5. Feminists shut down forum for battered husbands.
6. Propaganda campaign against male fathers wanting custody.
7. Feminists wish to slander accused names before convicted. 
8. Try to shut down female prisons.
9. Create rape laws that exclude female rapists.
10. Make it impossible to charge women with rape.
11. Feminists against equal custody.
12. Female felons should serve home sentences.
13. Told judges to be lenient on women.
14. Feminists cover up female domestic violence.
15. Feminists don’t want the gov to help unemployed men.
16. Feminists launch campaigns to help girls only while boys are doing worse in every facet of education.
17. Males who were raped as a child still have to pay child support.
18. Women should have the right to put a child up for adoption before the father gets custody.
19. Feminists against beyond reasonable doubt when it’s male rapists.
20. 5 rights feminism ignores for men.
21. Feminists blame males for their abuse.
22. The primary aggressor clause where only men get charged with abuse.
23. Shame men into going to war.
24. Feminists dismiss female child rapists.
25. Feminists say men can’t talk about domestic abuse.
26. Feminists mock a man who has his dick cut off.
27. Strawmanning MRA members.
28. feminists attack church.
29. Feminists transphobia
30. Feminists slander the MRM
31. Again, 
32. And again, 
33. Call them terrorists.
34. Feminists say Men can’t be raped. 
35. Feminists defend female raping minor.
36. Feminist defends why fucking an 8 year old boy isn’t rape.
37. Feminists primary aggressor clause discriminates against males.
38. Feminists cover up female domestic abuse stats.
39. Woman smashing bottle in mans face in public. Nobody gives a fuck.
40. Jezebel mocks men who are abused.
41. Feminists make sure the gov doesn’t spend money on male shelters or male research.
42. Female on male abuse in public is at best ignored, and at worst celebrated.
43. Public stops a man from abusing a woman in public, same crowd laughs when the roles are reversed. 
44. No funding for male shelter. 
45. Founder of Canadas only male shelter for abuse forced to close due to lack of funding before committing suicide. 

Bomb threats

From http://feminismisimportantlove.tumblr.com/post/87789053818/i-hope-someone-bombs-that-hotel-where-the-mras-are

Feminists have been making a lot of these bomb threats. I guess they feel that what they did to Erin Pizzey's dog was just practice, and they are now moving to the big leagues.

I wonder if Hillary Clinton is already drawing up their Presidential Pardons?

"But since when has MRAs done -anything- for male victims”

hellnoradfems answers Feminist attacks on Male Rights Activism

Reblogged from(http://hellnoradfems.tumblr.com/post/87033962058/imminentdeathsyndrome-sarahjhuynh

“I doubt feminists would be against helping to fund male support groups for domestic violence and sexual abuse”

Erin Pizzey started one of the first women’s shelters in the modern world. Pizzey has been the subject of death threats from feminists because of her claim that most domestic violence is reciprocal, and that women are equally as capable of violence as men. Because of feminists who not only threatened her, her family, and shot her family dog she went into exile for over a decade.


Here’s a fundraising campaign to build a men’s shelter in Ohio that only raised $235 of its $100,000 goal. If this were a fundraiser for a women’s shelter the goal would have been met in no time.

According to a special report by SAVE, “An estimated 1,200 abuse shelters are currently in operation in the United States. It’s well-known that most of these shelters routinely turn away male DV victims, or provide them a substantially lower level of service.

One former shelter director revealed,  ’The shelter did not provide services to male victims of domestic violence, even when the men had suffered physical abuse similar to what women had experienced.’

Psychologist David Fontes noted that when he advised male victims to call local domestic violence programs for help, his clients found that ‘either the shelters and centers never returned their calls, or they were told by the workers that they really don’t have the services for male victims of domestic violence.’ In those cases when men in desperate straits showed up at their door for help, Fontes noted that ‘some of the men felt they were treated at these shelters and centers more with suspect than respect.’

Ironically, not only do shelters discriminate against male victims, they also treat female batterers as victims. In one case a female abuser called wanted to get help with her anger management problem, but the local domestic violence center ‘tried to convince her that she was a victim and not a perpetrator.’

In a more curious case:
A woman was arrested and ordered out of the house following her assault against her husband. She was referred to a shelter. Her attorney provided the shelter counselor with a detailed account of what had transpired: ‘Mrs. C. grabbed Mr. C. by his necktie (and) he pushed her away. Mrs. C. then punched his face and her fingernail cut his neck.’ And how did the shelter workers assess the situation in its records? ‘Physical abuse’ of the woman by her husband.

Judy King Smith, director of the Rape and Domestic Violence Information Center in Morgantown, West Virginia, once admitted, ‘We do not shelter men in the shelter even if it’s empty.’

Why?

For the simple reason that ‘we were founded for the purpose of providing shelter to battered women and their children.’

According to Boston Globe columnist Cathy Young, these coordinating councils ‘formally require member organizations to embrace the feminist analysis of abuse as patriarchal coercion.’ An example of that perspective came from the director of the Massachusetts Coalition Against Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence, who made this dismissive comment about male victims: ‘Sometimes it snows in Florida … but we don’t make public policy around it.’

These coalitions have not been welcoming to organizations that serve male victims.

In Maine, the Maine Coalition to End Domestic Violence refused to approve the application for membership from the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men, explaining that our ‘current criteria require that membership be organizations whose primary purpose is to provide a full range of services to battered women and their children.’

In New Hampshire, the New Hampshire Coalition against Domestic and Sexual Violence likewise refused membership to the Violence Intervention Program – New Hampshire, on the grounds that VIP-NH, which had a predominantly male clientele, duplicated the services already provided by A Safe Place, a domestic violence crisis center located in the same area. But Ann Venier, the center’s education and outreach coordinator, had a different story to tell: ‘We did not provide shelter to any men.’

More recently, a survey of 3,410 shelter persons residing at 215 abuse shelters in eight states found fewer than one percent of the respondents were male.”

TL;DR Feminist organizations influence shelters to reject male victims, attempt to convince female aggressors that they are the victim,  and shelters serve less than one percent of male victims across the United States. Feminists do not acknowledge male victims, don’t care about them, and threaten those who tell the truth.
"But since when has MRAs done -anything- for male victims”

Earl Silverman was a men’s rights advocate who operated Canada’s only shelter for male victims of domestic abuse — doing so out of his own pocket and without government funding — but was forced to sell the property because he couldn’t afford its upkeep.

Silverman attempted to get funding from provincial and federal governments to help run his shelter and home, but believed he was always refused because the space was dedicated to helping male victims and their children. Silverman committed suicide last year in April due to personal demons.

The incredibly high suicide rate of males around the world in comparison to female suicide rates has always remained a main focus for men’s rights groups.

TL;DR MRAs have done something for male victims, you stupid twat. Perhaps if feminists weren’t around every fucking corner trying to thwart their pursuits to understand male issues and figure out solutions to them then maybe there would be more examples of things they have done.

Maybe feminists should just fuck off and stop protesting MRA events, tearing down posters promoting them, and attempting to slander their movement at every turn. In other words, MRAs never gave a fuck about feminists before they started to slander them.

A better understanding of Anti-Feminism.

by  Mr. Cappadocia, edited by myself.

(source)

If you read nothing else I’ve ever written, or ever will write, please read this because it may make everything about my philosophy clear.

(Speaking in response to the suicide of Earl Silverman, a man who operated Canada’s only male run men’s shelter, after he had been rfepeatedly denied funding for his shelter while the Canadian government had set aside $350,000,000.00 for Feminist run women’s shelters.)

Blondeyed says: "The Governor General of Canada is male. The Prime Minister of Canada is male. The Speaker of the Senate is male. Over half of current Canadian senators are male. The majority of Canadian Supreme Court judges are male. The majority of members of the Canadian Parliament are male.

See where I’m going with this? The government that you are so infuriated with, the one that refused to provide funding for Canada’s only domestic abuse shelter for men, is primarily made up of men. And you blame feminists"

Because you’re right, you’re completely right. All of those men in power and not a single one of them thought it would be prudent to fund a men’s shelter. Even a *single* men’s shelter, despite devoting hundreds of millions to women’s shelters.

You make it that far but then you don’t stop to ask why. Why didn’t those men in power fund that shelter? You of course will think “Because Patriarchy!” and that’s where you would be completely wrong (and also why I blame Feminism for what I’m about to explain).
There’s a big huge gigantic difference between men and women that is incredibly significant but almost never discussed. Own group bias. Women have it, men don’t. This means that men prefer women, and women prefer women, but nobody prefers men.

As explained here: Four experiments confirmed that women’s automatic in-group bias is remarkably stronger than men’s and investigated explanations for this sex difference, derived from potential sources of implicit attitudes (L. A. Rudman, 2004). In Experiment 1, only women (not men) showed cognitive balance among in-group bias, identity, and self-esteem (A. G. Greenwald et al., 2002), revealing that men lack a mechanism that bolsters automatic own group preference.

I cannot overemphasize how important the above paragraph is. Everything else being even, women favor women over men, and *men* favor women over men.

There’s more though, because many women clearly like men… so what gives? And this is a second very important part of why Anti-Feminism exists. Because Feminists, for example, only really see this guy:

and never this guy:

When they do their comparisons… in their pursuit of “equality” it’s not the homeless man they expect to be equal to… it’s the wealthy executive.

The truth is many women do the exact same thing. Poor, undesirable, pathetic men are of no interest to them. None. This is actually the root of the “Nice Guy” meme. He’s a man that comes pre-rejected and so is worthy of nothing but scorn, ridicule, contempt, and hate.

This isn’t some massive plot at work. This is *human nature*. It’s instinct. Women care about other women as a survival technique, and men don’t care about the well being of other men as a reproductive technique. This forced competition, often to the death, among men, is very cruel but has been decidedly beneficial to the human race as a whole.

So women care about men at the top, and other women, but not the men at the bottom. Powerful men care about women, and men at the bottom care about women. Nobody, however, is especially concerned with those men at the bottom and they make up a HUGE percentage of men. And we just don’t care about them.

That’s why all the most powerful men divert so many resources to the care and well being of women while *simultaneously* being relatively disinterested in aiding other men. Not only are women the majority of voters, but there is a built in justification for doing so.

Feminism, being composed largely of women, mimics society. It sees the top men, makes policy based on the top men, and casually ignores the bottom men. The last Feminist I’ve heard of that tried to set up a men’s shelter was Erin Prizzey and Feminists *killed her dog* and drove her out of England. Here’s where it gets interesting. Because right now in your head you might be thinking that’s terrible they killed her dog. So your sympathy is with the woman that lost her dog, or maybe even the dog that lost its life. It’s not with the men who lost the domestic abuse shelter. You didn’t even give them a passing thought.

And all of society is like this. All of it. The men at the bottom get ignored, get glossed over, get scorned, get ridiculed, get sneered at. And Feminism, as what is currently substituting for “gender studies” aids and abets this because it does its damndest to ensure nobody ever thinks about those men at the bottom.

So now not only do people just naturally avoid thinking about the bottom men… now Feminists actively work to *ensure* nobody has any interest in them or their suffering.

And that’s a damn fine reason to be Anti-Feminist.

Why I Need Men's Rights

Oratorasaurus' quick answer


My answer?

Well, I'm an egalitarian and an MRA. I want a world without double standards.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale
, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZAuqkqxk9A, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/why-are-there-such-double-standards.html

Did you know that female rape is legally erased by the clever use of definitions?

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/rape-erasure-blog-reblogged.html

RAINN uses the dodgy definition and is endlessly quoted as evidence of the perversity of men. At the same time, women get lighter sentences and are coddled by the media for acts of sexual perversity http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/female-pedophiles-get-weekend-detention.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/lesbians-need-to-be-taught-not-to-rape.html

In India, recently, the definition of rape was legally changed to mean no woman could be charged with it. http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/a-sad-day-for-male-rape-victims-in-india/
https://archive.is/jaJRz 6 May 2015 03:36:54 UTC

 In Israel, feminists agitated to make sure the immunity remained on the books there. http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape
https://archive.is/SkIjG  8 Aug 2015 11:34:52 UTC

The ratio of rape victims is actually pretty close to 1:1 for male and females. http://www.genderratic.com/p/836/manufacturing-female-victimhood-and-marginalizing-vulnerable-men/

I want legal equality, which means that if there's a domestic dispute, my sex isn't an issue (and it is in the US, the arrest guidelines are to arrest 1 party, and it's the taller one, which usually means the man). http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/primary-or-predominant-aggressor-laws.html

I want to know I'm relatively safe when I have sex that I won't have a false accusation of rape (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/false-rape-accusations.html)..

..that if i'm drunk and they're drunk, and the law says drunk people can't consent, either we both should be charged - or neither. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/08/women-cannot-consent-because-they-are.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/consent-continued.html

I want to know my life is as valued as a woman's. When i look at the money invested in breast cancer vs prostate cancer, or in domestic violence shelters, or the opposition to universal, rather than male-only conscription, I don't see it at all. Men are disposable.

Going from the imagery google presents, females perpetrating DV is non-existent.

Almost all police and governmental campaigns show
heterosexual relationships,
male perp,
female victim
- even when a woman massacred her seven kids and her niece.
Or eight of her own children.

I've talked to criminologists who claimed there were NO cases of DV where a woman was at fault. None.


 I know first hand that's only happening because they ignore them. Legal support is gender specific. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/why-dont-men-in-australia-get-same-path.html


I'm hoping my friend has a better outcome, but i can tell you that even with voice recordings of threats, he still couldn't get an AVO  - police protection from his ex - and she still shares custody despite a history of violence. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/men-in-sweden-are-at-least-as-likely.html


I want Men’s reproductive rights

    Right to know one is, or will be a father.
    Right to Legal Paternal Surrender.
    Right to Ownership of Person (i.e. semen, c.f. Woman Used Sperm From Oral Sex To Get Pregnant, Gets Child Support for example).

Right to know you’re a father, right to determine you’re not ready to be a father, and right to prosecute those who misuse your semen to their own ends.

I never, ever want to see a headline like this again, but I know I will because men and male sexuality is demonised now, men are seen as filthy rape monsters, barely restrained but always close to the edge . http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/boy-15-kills-himself-after-facing.html

I want to see an end to the Duluth model (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/tthe-duluth-model-of-misandry.html), which says that only women should be parents, and which was instituted by feminists.

It's the reason men are so bitter about child custody. It's resulted in situations where a woman can rape a child - then demand payments for the offspring. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/a-12-year-old-boy-can-be-raped-then.html

Woman, 18, charged with boy's rape at church

In my country, aboriginal men are arrested for possessing pornography that is perfectly legal for anyone else... the belief that male sexuality is dangerous, and that our masturbation aids must be destroyed, our penises mutilated, our gaze lowered, and all sexual advances prohibited, is a weird combination of christian and feminist beliefs.

We live in a time when men are forever told they are unwanted - "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" - "my vibrator is better than your body!"

I cannot imagine a woman would ever hear the equivalent of those statements.

I remember when men could feel pride, could feel desired, and were willing to fight and die for this country.

Most young men now seem somewhat ashamed of being born. Or they radicalise, either becoming MRAs, or religious fanatics. Religion offers self-worth to men -put at a terrible price. Look at the young men in the US who became muslim terrorists - why do you think they found that lethal ideology appealing?

I have to wonder, when men are taught they are worthless.. why should they put their neck on the line for women? Why should they have to die to protect a system that claims they are useless? Why should any man be intimate with a woman who says he is unwanted? Or who at least, doesn't oppose her Sisters who claim he is?

Finally, we live in a time when my speech - my opposition to feminism - looks like it will become a crime in some countries like Sweden, a ban which looks to be spreading-  and such speech -which i hope you will agree is nonviolent - has been used to ban youtube and other social media accounts.


http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/should-laws-be-passed-to-suppress.html Violence is being used to stifle the expression of people like me.

So even if you don't believe a single word of anything I have said, ask yourself this:

What violence have MRA groups done?

https://youtu.be/FWxAljFlb-c

What violence is being done to MRAs?

Isn't opposing that violence and allowing free speech the reason we fought against the fascists in WW2? The reason that millions of people died, and yet we still counted that sacrifice as worthwhile? Will it all have been in vain?

Men and women... are people. No better, no worse. Fellow travellers on the road of humanity, equal sharers of the land and sky. That is the single truth of Men's Rights. And that is why you need it too.