Feminists actively campaign to erase female crimes

Sources:
1) http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-03-07/india/37530996_1_gender-women-activists-human-rights
2) http://www.indiankanoon.org/docfragment/623254/?formInput=ipc%20sec%20375
3) http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1279834/

http://do-feminists-kno.tumblr.com/

Why I Need Men's Rights

Oratorasaurus' quick answer


My answer?

Well, I'm an egalitarian and an MRA. I want a world without double standards.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale
, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZAuqkqxk9A, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/why-are-there-such-double-standards.html

Did you know that female rape is legally erased by the clever use of definitions?

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/rape-erasure-blog-reblogged.html

RAINN uses the dodgy definition and is endlessly quoted as evidence of the perversity of men. At the same time, women get lighter sentences and are coddled by the media for acts of sexual perversity http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/female-pedophiles-get-weekend-detention.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/lesbians-need-to-be-taught-not-to-rape.html

In India, recently, the definition of rape was legally changed to mean no woman could be charged with it. http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/a-sad-day-for-male-rape-victims-in-india/
https://archive.is/jaJRz 6 May 2015 03:36:54 UTC

 In Israel, feminists agitated to make sure the immunity remained on the books there. http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape
https://archive.is/SkIjG  8 Aug 2015 11:34:52 UTC

The ratio of rape victims is actually pretty close to 1:1 for male and females. http://www.genderratic.com/p/836/manufacturing-female-victimhood-and-marginalizing-vulnerable-men/

I want legal equality, which means that if there's a domestic dispute, my sex isn't an issue (and it is in the US, the arrest guidelines are to arrest 1 party, and it's the taller one, which usually means the man). http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/primary-or-predominant-aggressor-laws.html

I want to know I'm relatively safe when I have sex that I won't have a false accusation of rape (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/false-rape-accusations.html)..

..that if i'm drunk and they're drunk, and the law says drunk people can't consent, either we both should be charged - or neither. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/08/women-cannot-consent-because-they-are.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/consent-continued.html

I want to know my life is as valued as a woman's. When i look at the money invested in breast cancer vs prostate cancer, or in domestic violence shelters, or the opposition to universal, rather than male-only conscription, I don't see it at all. Men are disposable.

Going from the imagery google presents, females perpetrating DV is non-existent.

Almost all police and governmental campaigns show
heterosexual relationships,
male perp,
female victim
- even when a woman massacred her seven kids and her niece.
Or eight of her own children.

I've talked to criminologists who claimed there were NO cases of DV where a woman was at fault. None.


 I know first hand that's only happening because they ignore them. Legal support is gender specific. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/why-dont-men-in-australia-get-same-path.html


I'm hoping my friend has a better outcome, but i can tell you that even with voice recordings of threats, he still couldn't get an AVO  - police protection from his ex - and she still shares custody despite a history of violence. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/men-in-sweden-are-at-least-as-likely.html


I want Men’s reproductive rights

    Right to know one is, or will be a father.
    Right to Legal Paternal Surrender.
    Right to Ownership of Person (i.e. semen, c.f. Woman Used Sperm From Oral Sex To Get Pregnant, Gets Child Support for example).

Right to know you’re a father, right to determine you’re not ready to be a father, and right to prosecute those who misuse your semen to their own ends.

I never, ever want to see a headline like this again, but I know I will because men and male sexuality is demonised now, men are seen as filthy rape monsters, barely restrained but always close to the edge . http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/boy-15-kills-himself-after-facing.html

I want to see an end to the Duluth model (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/tthe-duluth-model-of-misandry.html), which says that only women should be parents, and which was instituted by feminists.

It's the reason men are so bitter about child custody. It's resulted in situations where a woman can rape a child - then demand payments for the offspring. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/a-12-year-old-boy-can-be-raped-then.html

Woman, 18, charged with boy's rape at church

In my country, aboriginal men are arrested for possessing pornography that is perfectly legal for anyone else... the belief that male sexuality is dangerous, and that our masturbation aids must be destroyed, our penises mutilated, our gaze lowered, and all sexual advances prohibited, is a weird combination of christian and feminist beliefs.

We live in a time when men are forever told they are unwanted - "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" - "my vibrator is better than your body!"

I cannot imagine a woman would ever hear the equivalent of those statements.

I remember when men could feel pride, could feel desired, and were willing to fight and die for this country.

Most young men now seem somewhat ashamed of being born. Or they radicalise, either becoming MRAs, or religious fanatics. Religion offers self-worth to men -put at a terrible price. Look at the young men in the US who became muslim terrorists - why do you think they found that lethal ideology appealing?

I have to wonder, when men are taught they are worthless.. why should they put their neck on the line for women? Why should they have to die to protect a system that claims they are useless? Why should any man be intimate with a woman who says he is unwanted? Or who at least, doesn't oppose her Sisters who claim he is?

Finally, we live in a time when my speech - my opposition to feminism - looks like it will become a crime in some countries like Sweden, a ban which looks to be spreading-  and such speech -which i hope you will agree is nonviolent - has been used to ban youtube and other social media accounts.


http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/should-laws-be-passed-to-suppress.html Violence is being used to stifle the expression of people like me.

So even if you don't believe a single word of anything I have said, ask yourself this:

What violence have MRA groups done?

https://youtu.be/FWxAljFlb-c

What violence is being done to MRAs?

Isn't opposing that violence and allowing free speech the reason we fought against the fascists in WW2? The reason that millions of people died, and yet we still counted that sacrifice as worthwhile? Will it all have been in vain?

Men and women... are people. No better, no worse. Fellow travellers on the road of humanity, equal sharers of the land and sky. That is the single truth of Men's Rights. And that is why you need it too.

Chanting RAPE CULTURE RAPE CULTURE RAPE CULTURE does not make it real

Rape culture, in the west, is a myth. If there was any truth to it, then the boys wouldn't have been punished.

Well, it's a myth to an extent... when women rape, it's not even acknowledged as such by the FBI. It's not even counted as a crime in many countries thanks to changes made by Feminists recently. 

Even in Israel.

Even in the UK!

When women rape, they ARE coddled, excuses are made by the media, Feminists and even judges, their childhood investigated to find out who victimised them into doing such an unnatural thing.

Their sentences, when they are convicted, are shorter. Their prison conditions.. better. Baroness Corston dedicated her life to closing women's prisons, because the poor dears don't deserve to be punished, not like those filthy men.

And in rape trials men are guilty unless proven innocent, despite false allegations ranging up to 90%.

So what do I see here? I see a woman so smug in her self-entitlement and professional victimhood that she is happy to rage males for a system that punishes males for an act universally condemned ... by males. That refuses to acknowledge female on female rape can possibly even exist, let alone be common.

I see a man so lost in internalised misandry that he will fight to the death to protect a woman's right to rape without consequence, or accuse him of rape without evidence. 

These people chant their dogma, hoping you will believe, oh yea! -  believe, brothers and sisters!

Well, here's something I ask you to try instead.

Rape Erasure blog reblogged!

I've done my best to represent the conversational flow accurately. Tumblr was never designed with serious discussions in mind.

It's interesting to see that Female Supremacists simply do not care about the truth; they'll create statistics on a whim, and edit quotes to better suit their needs. Socrates was just a dead white male, in their book, and it really does show.

jungs-endless-shadow reblogged abunchofassholes

Follow

anarcha-pie Source:

anonymous asked:

You always talk about how bad rape is. You are absolutely right but you completely erase male victims. Women rape too. It is rare but it exists and if you really are against rape, you can not erase a victim group.

anarcha-pie answered:

Lol 99.7% of rapes are perpetrated by males. Rape is a form of male violence.

 

stfueverything:-
BUT WHAT ABOUT TEH MENNNNNZZZZ!!!Isn’t it amazing how they constantly ignore that, and make it out to be like we’re the bad ones because we “ignore” male victims. No assholes, you’re ignoring male perpetrators. 

 Also, male rape victims are very nearly always raped by males.  By saying “but..but the women rape tooooo” and ignoring male perpetrators you are, in fact “erasing your own victim group”

  
karmainmyeye:-
 So let me get this straight; 
You’ve come to the conclusion that almost 100% of rapists are men. You’ve done this by using a definition of rape that exclusively defines rape as something only men can do.

Such mental gymnastics. Gold medal for you.

e-tank:- 

Nope.     
 I used this definition:

"Rape is sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person’s consent.”  

As you can see the base definition of rape has nothing to do with the gender of the perpetrator.

Then I looked at the statistics and percentages of rape of females by males and rape of males by males:  99%

Then I looked at the statistics and percentages of rape of males by females and rape of females by females: 1%  (BTW .7% of that 1% is female/female)

Then I said, “rape victims are very nearly always raped by males.” Behold my mental gymnastics!

Now I’ll say that rape is predominately a form of male violence.  if you believe that the .3% of rapes committed by females on male victims negates that statement then you’re delusional. 
karmainmyeye:-

The statistics are based off of that definition. The Bureau of Justice website where feminists’ favourite cherrypicked statistic comes from is currently down, but Wikipedia will do just fine.

 Let me show you a thing. 

The U.S Bureau of Justice Statistics, which defines rape as penetration by the offender, states that 91% of rape victims are female and 9% are male, and 99% of rapists are male.

You see that right there?

I don’t think I need to elaborate on how this clearly states “only men can rape”. Forced envelopment and other forms of rape are excluded entirely, which by extension means that female rapists and their victims are swept under the rug and ignored.

Go find a new statistic, because that one is complete trash.

e-tank:- 
Nope. 

I gave you the statistics by studies defining rape as such.

"Rape is sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person’s consent.” The stats are based on that definition.  

But if that’s not good enough I’ll use your own source.

"The FBI changed the definition from  ”The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” for their annual Uniform Crime Reports.

The definition, which had remained unchanged since 1927, was considered outdated and narrow. 

The updated definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men, recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape, and includes instances in which the victim is unable to give consent because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity, and recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated and thus unable to consent because of ingestion of drugs or alcohol.”  

And even then 99% of rapes are still committed by males.  No matter how much you want rapists to be 50% male and 50% female the fact is that if you get raped there is a 99% chance you are getting raped by a male regardless of your gender.

1. ^ Jump up to:^a b c "Rape". Merriam-Webster. April 15, 2011.
2. ^ Jump up to:^a b "Sexual violence chapter 6". World Health Organization. April 15, 2011.
3. Jump up^ "Rape". dictionary.reference.com. April 15, 2011.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} "Rape". legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com. April 15, 2011.
5. ^ Jump up to:^a b "Rape at the National Level, number of police recorded offenses".United Nations.
6. Jump up^ American Medical Association (1995) Sexual Assault in America. AMA.
7. ^ Jump up to:^a b c "A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-12-31.
8. Jump up^ "UCSC Rape Prevention Education: Rape Statistics". www2.ucsc.edu. Retrieved 2008-01-01. The study was conducted in Detroit, USA.
9. Jump up^ Abbey, A., BeShears, R., Clinton-Sherrod, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 323–332."Similarities and differences in women’s sexual assault experiences based on tactics used by the perpetrator". Retrieved 10 December 2007.
10. Jump up^ "Statistics | Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network". www.rainn.org. Retrieved 2008-01-01.^ Human Rights WatchNo Escape: Male Rape In U.S. Prisons. Part VII. Anomaly or Epidemic: The Incidence of Prisoner-on-Prisoner Rape.; estimates that 100,000–140,000 violent male-male rapes occur in U.S. prisons annually; compare with FBI statistics that estimate 90,000 violent male-female rapes occur annually.

 karmainmyeye:-You are ACTUALLY this fucking dense. I can’t believe it. At this point I can’t tell if you’re wilfully ignorant or if you’re just deliberately spouting misinformation. 

The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.
  
This is the current definition as of January 2012. It says so right here. And as recently as May 2013, an FAQ was posted about that definition. It’s still current and is still used by law enforcement agencies.

I also find it hilarious that you copy-pasted the paragraph from the Wikipedia page on rape and doctored it to try to make it look like the current definition is gender-equal and not based on penetration. 

What you posted;

"The FBI changed the definition from  ”The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” for their annual Uniform Crime Reports.

The definition, which had remained unchanged since 1927, was considered outdated and narrow. The updated definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men, recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape, and includes instances in which the victim is unable to give consent because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity, and recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated and thus unable to consent because of ingestion of drugs or alcohol.”

And here’s what the page actually says. The bolded portion is the section of text you removed.

In 2012, the FBI changed their definition from "The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." to “The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” for their annual Uniform Crime Reports.

The definition, which had remained unchanged since 1927, was considered outdated and narrow. The updated definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men, recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape, includes instances in which the victim is unable to give consent because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity, and recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated and thus unable to consent because of ingestion of drugs or alcohol.

Intellectual dishonesty from a feminist. I’m shocked. 

In short, the legal federal definition essentially states that only men can rape, and thus excludes female rapists. This protects female rapists from any form of punishment and greatly skews statistics to the point of invalidating them; all statistics based on that definition (such as the 99% you keep spouting) as well as statistics based on conviction or arrest rates are completely useless and unusable.

And for your “sources”;

^ Jump up to:^abc"Rape". Merriam-Webster. April 15, 2011.

The dictionary definition isn’t the same as the legal federal definition. This source is completely irrelevant.

^ Jump up to:^a b "Sexual violence chapter 6". World Health Organization. April 15, 2011.

It took me about 3 seconds to find this;

Sexual violence includes rape, defined as physically forced or otherwise coerced penetration – even if slight – of the vulva or anus, using a penis, other body parts or an object.

They define rape as requiring penetration. Useless.

Jump up^ "Rape". dictionary.reference.com. April 15, 2011.
^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} "Rape". legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com. April 15, 2011.

More random dictionary sites. Still not relevant - not until you can find a source that uses these definitions as their definition of rape and bases their statistics off of said definitions. You haven’t yet.

^ Jump up to:^a b "Rape at the National Level, number of police recorded offenses".United Nations.

I can’t read this document without Microsoft Excel.

Jump up^ American Medical Association (1995) Sexual Assault in America. AMA.

18 years old, no link to anything. Next.

^ Jump up to:^abc"A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-12-31.

UK government website, therefore uses UK government definition. I wonder what that is?

Rape has been redefined from the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (amended in 1976 and 1994) to read:

A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

>strictly gendered definition
lol bye

Jump up^ "UCSC Rape Prevention Education: Rape Statistics". www2.ucsc.edu. Retrieved 2008-01-01. The study was conducted in Detroit, USA.

This 404’d.  How about you try actually checking the sources instead of just copy-pasting from the references on Wikipedia?

Jump up^ Abbey, A., BeShears, R., Clinton-Sherrod, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 323–332."Similarities and differences in women’s sexual assault experiences based on tactics used by the perpetrator". Retrieved 10 December 2007.

This whole thing defines rape as something men do to women. There is gendered language everywhere. Pass.

Jump up^ "Statistics | Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network". www.rainn.org. Retrieved 2008-01-01.^ Human Rights Watch

RAINN is hilarious. Not only do they deliberately fudge numbers to further their own agenda, but the sources in their statistics pages regarding rape all link to either outdated information or US government sources, meaning it’s all based on penetration. Bye.

No Escape: Male Rape In U.S. Prisons. Part VII. Anomaly or Epidemic: The Incidence of Prisoner-on-Prisoner Rape.; estimates that 100,000–140,000 violent male-male rapes occur in U.S. prisons annually; compare with FBI statistics that estimate 90,000 violent male-female rapes occur annually.

I like how the only time a feminist mentions prison rape, it’s for the sake of pushing some “only men are rapists” bullshit.

I don’t really get what you’re trying to say by copy-pasting that wiki source. I mean when you take the most dangerous men in the country and throw them all into one place where they’re cooped up for years and years it’s not really all that surprising that rape runs rampant in there?

Also;

From here. Table 2.1 and 2.2 on pages 18 and 19.

Just as many men rape women as women rape men. The CDC just doesn’t classify forced envelopment as “rape” for some reason. But yeah, you’re wrong about everything. Get dunked.

e-tank:-
Really good breakdown of a fucking shitstain who really went out of their way to erase male rape victims

Like jesus christ, did you ever stop to think to yourself:

"Hey"

"I am literally editing the content of my sources to make a rape definition look more gender neutral, so I can deny that male rape victims are erased, which will score brownie points for my political agenda"

Did that ever cross your mind or is this sort of willful ignorance just a sort of instinctive behavior in some types?

Do you just not even realize what you’re doing as you do it?

Should laws be passed to suppress certain types of anti-feminism?

Surely this is an outrageous question? Didn't we fight wars in which millions of people died, fighting for the freedom to speak the truth as they saw it?

Apparently they died for nothing...



"not at all, it would go underground and people need to know it exists in order to oppose it and prevent it from growing. "

Hmm... yeah, that sounds comforting... so opposing feminism is the equivalent of belonging to some sort of dangerous cult... people don't even talk that way about the KKK and they killed people..

"MNL_1221 answered 1 month ago
We already have some books that suppress certain types of anti-feminism: namely, laws that prohibit job discrimination, sexual harassment, unfair treatment of rape victims (such as prosecutors asking a rape victim during a trial about her past sexual experience), and such."

So opposing feminism is the equivalent of sexual harassment or discriminating against job applicants? But they are right about the rape trials; it's a venue where a male is presumed guilty and the accuser given elevated status.

"However, because of the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech, I don't think you can pass laws preventing anti-feminists from expressing their opinion about women's place in the world. They are free to express their thoughts, and so are those who disagree with them."

Damn shame.

"That said, certain rules in certain organizations--Yahoo!, for instance--allow some organizations to censor speech that they find hateful. Also, the media has rules and laws concerning certain types of speech that may hurt or offend others."

But here's a loophole we can use to suppress free speech! Yay!

"However, speech meant to incite violence against others--such as calling for violence against women who don't "tow the line"--would be censorable and prosecutable. "

"speech meant to incite violence against males"... that's not worth mentioning. Heck, they deserve it! It's "*fabulous*", to quote Sharon Osbourne.

"Freedom of speech should not mean freedom to defame. "

Yes, it should.. if it's true. Truth must be an absolute protection. If Richard Nixon is a crook, and I'm arrested for saying that, then what freedom do I have?

"dark eyes answered 1 month ago
No. In their manner of getting their cause "out" they are inadvertently indicating the necessity of the feminist movement!

Because arguing against National Socialism is proof we need National Socialism!

"They're burying themselves. They cuss, they threat, they go around with this "she has that,I want it, too" attitude."

How dare they demand equality from an organisation that claims it is about equality! Don't they realise it's equality only when it benefits women?

"They want the rights of having a uterus, without having a uterus."

Strawman. I don't recall any man demanding the right have a womb. Except maybe in Life of Brian...

"They want to rid lower standards, affirmative action, then complain women are weak, emotional, etc... then complain we DON'T take the dangerous, deadly jobs! "

This paragraph is incoherent.

Yes, we want to rid lower standards of education for men,
Yes, we want to rid lower standards of healthcare for men,
Yes, we want to rid lower standards of justice for men,
Yes, we want to rid lower standards of social value for men.

We are right to complain when women want to be paid the same as a man doing a dangerous job, without taking the same risks. That's anti-capitalism at it's finest. Even communist countries gave the worst jobs some sort of incentives.

You know what they call forcing a group to do the dangerous stuff without rewards?

Slavery.

And so on and so on.

finally, check these three links:


Google Inc., YouTube LLC: Categorize the MRM as flaggable for terrorism/promoting hate on YouTube.

Colleges offer credit to students who enter ‘feminist thinking’ into Wikipedia
NORDIC TAXPAYER FUNDED REPORT DEMANDS ANTI-FEMINIST VIEWS BE DEEMED ‘HATE SPEECH’ AND CRIMINALIZED

People are saying YES and doing their best to make it so that people like me will be silenced or imprisoned. Every mention of us will be controlled through wikipedia et al so that we will be defined by our enemies; or outright *erased*.

Men in Sweden are at least as likely as women to be victims of domestic violence

According to researchers at SahlgrenskaAcademy in Gothenburg*, men as likely as women to suffer spousal abuse.

*https://archive.is/l6MOT  16 Feb 2014 01:52:55 UTC


So what picture do they use to illustrate this?

That's right. They couldn't find a stock photo where a man is a victim. The idea is so much against the dominant narrative that even as they say it, they can't find one image to illustrate their point.

I'm not surprised. I tried myself. Almost all of the images were comical.

"8 to 11 percent of men reported being victims of physical violence at the hands of their spouse in the past year. The corresponding figure for women was 8 percent...

"Both men and women use the kind of violence that can harm the other person... The respondents mentioned behaviour ranging from punching, kicking and pushing to strangleholds and threats at gunpoint.

The study also revealed, however, that between 8 and 11 percent of male victims reported that they had also been perpetrators of violence and Krantz added that the results should be interpreted "with caution".

"We do not know in detail what led women to use violence in aggression," she explained."

Even now, she's making excuses for the women. The men ... must have deserved it.

As this commentator put it:

actanonverba8

"Krantz added that the results should be interpreted "with caution".

Translation: Kantz doesn´t want the feminist mafia coming after her.

 "Researchers also found that female victims of domestic violence suffered
from more severe health effects than men, with women were more likely
to report depression, anxiety and difficulty sleeping."

 What a dumb comment. It is well known that women report anything associated with being vulnerable, weakened, or victimized more than men. It is also well-known that women false(sic) report these things more. I´m not saying that women are naturally bigger liars. It´s simply a case of what a person expects to encounter when they make a complaint or seek assistance.

 Women are far more likely to receive empathy and gracious help. In fact, for women, who is the bigger "victim" can almost be like a form of currency. Men are far more likely to be ignored, ridiculed, or told to "man up". Men, for the most part, are despised for being victims. The result: Women are far more forthcoming about perceived suffering and victimization, men are not.

Baroness Corston, how do you explain this? Still want to close all the women's prisons?

Further Reading:

1) Domestic violence is most commonly reciprocal

Saved from

no other snapshots from this url

24 Sep 2015 10:55:50 UTC
https://archive.is/UVAlN

2) If You're Not Straight, You're at Higher Risk for Domestic Violence - most help-centers and laws focus exclusively on straight female victims

Saved from

no other snapshots from this url

6 Mar 2014 09:18:24 UTChttps://archive.is/ZlUIL

Down with Halloween!

A Feminist Dictates what you horrible people had better not wear!

Good grief.

By this logic, Americans shouldn’t celebrate Halloween at all. It’s a European cultural tradition; how dare they appropriate it?!!!

Of course, another way to look at it is if we didn’t allow for cultural mixing and re-interpretation, we’d be back in the stone age. Just because Ogg has good idea with copper ingot doesn’t mean we should copy her… that’s appropriation!!!
"Dressing up as Pocahontas, and any other ‘native american’ outfit is a big nope. "

Pocahontas is a fantasy character. No-one dresses as the historical figure! “Native american outfits” are about as real as medieval damsel and knight outfits .. must they be banned too?

Do you think the Dark Ages were a joke to the peasants who lived through them and who were trampled by those people? How can you enjoy medieval re-enactment! Won’t somebody think of the peasants?!!

"Even worse if you’re white. "

Sooooo if you are native american, you can’t dress as a native american… because you would be insensitive to this person who represents all native americans whether they like it or not.

”Think twice before putting on a ‘slutty’ outfit. There’s a fine line between being sex positive and an ally to sex workers, and another to mock and amplify misogyny through objectification and use of slurs. “

This is incoherent but it’s in bold so don’t think because.. PATRIARCHY.You cannot say that women should be able to dress as they want without slut-shaming whilst simultaneously shaming them for dressing up as sluts!!

"Speak up (if the situation allows it) if you see any guardians pressuring kids to wear very gendered costumes… There is nothing wrong with things like little girls WANTING to wear all pink dresses and tiaras. That’s as awesome as them wanting to dress up as a superhero! "

Again, the author can’t see the self-contradictions!

"Be creative with your make up. There is no excuse for brown, yellow, and black facing, especially with so many online tutorials for amazing make up effects. Also it’s just fucked up."

Being something you are not for a day is fun. Why shouldn’t a black or yellow person try being white for a night? Or vice versa?

Poking fun of stereotypes is also fun, and the basis of a lot of comedy. Does the author want to dictate to Dave Chapelle or Eddie Murphy how to do their jobs?

"Fat suits aren’t okay. Those are bodies you’re wearing as a costume for laughs, while for some of us, that’s a fatphobic stigma we need to deal with daily. "

I can only assume the author weeps throughout any comedy. Being thin is funny. Being fat is funny. Being tall is funny. Being short… is funny! And walking around in a fat suit… can build empathy. Which trumps your fucking super-fragile ego by a country mile, because if there’s one thing this world needs, it’s empathy, and not more professional victims.

"Don’t wear a kimono because you wanna ‘be a geisha’ bc that will end in awkward culture appropriation that you cannot back up. Trust me."

Pretending to be a geisha is pretty much what modern geishas do. There’s always been a conflict about whether they were sex workers or entertainers. And you know what? Modern Japan has no problem with using westerners as geishas, they are quite popular.

Does the author freak out when they see a chinese person dressed as a cowboy or medieval european knight? I doubt it, only non-white people have these ‘feelings’ according to the author, who seems to be on a crusade to save everyone from the wicked whiteys!

"having cis guys “dress up as women” by wearing a dress and terrible wig is just not okay. Halloween could be this amazing space to explore representation. Instead, usually this just states what you really think of anyone feminine. You think femininity is false and vain, and you will come off as an asshole. Not to mention this is just transphobic on a different level of NOPE.”
Fuck your gender stereotypes! If men want to wear dresses, paint nails, wear make-up, they can and will do so without your permission. Just as women smoked cigars, wore trousers and even fake facial hair without asking men if this would hurt their pwecious fweelings.

And transvestitism has nothing to do with transexuality. But fuck you for condemning everyone throughout history with that fetish.

”DO YOUR GODDAMN RESEARCH BEFORE YOU GO AND WEAR SOMETHING THAT WILL DO MORE THAN HARM THOSE AROUND YOU…Your costume could trigger and be a micro aggression towards others.”

Translation: I choose to be harmed by everything you do. PATRIARCHY! PATRIARCHY!
PATRIARRRRRRRCHY!

Don’t question me don’t think STOP THINKING!

To all those who say real Feminists aren't Misandristic; is this woman an optical illusion?

emmameetsworld:

Idiot men: Your penis is not special.¹

the men I’m addressing right now are probably all minute men who cum so fast, their partner didn’t even realize you were inside them.²

If anyone’s value is affected by sexual intercourse or activity, the mans(sic) value would increase due to the fact that a lovely woman even let you touch her, let alone have sex with her.³

So knock it off, because women have really had enough of centuries of misogyny⁴,

and if you do not stop strutting around like your ding dong is made of solid gold, you will not get laid. ⁵

Because honestly, our vibrator does a much better than job (sic) than you anyway, and with a vibrator we don’t have to deal with your whiny ego issues.⁶

Basically: Stop.⁷

You are embarrassing yourselves and decreasing your game with that pompous attitude of yours.⁸

With that said, good luck.⁹

(source)

Translation:

1. Feel no pride in your body. We can be proud of ours, and will go on about the wonders of our genitalia in lengthy monologues.
2. Feminists  really hate all of you and will slur your sexual performance, making it clear you are just objects for our satisfaction, and poorly constructed ones at that.
3. Pussies are so wonderful that simply contacting one will increase the value of even pathetic males. We also fart rainbows and shit unicorns. I left a unicorn in your bed. Say thank you, now.
4. You are responsible for everything bad that ever happened to someone with a vagina.
5. Men who have pride in their body are unattractive. Only males who realise they are scum appeal to Feminists.
6. Feminists value nothing about
   your body in any case and so have no reason to have sex with you, since our machines are all we ever need. The fact Feminists do have sex with men, and even sometimes pay for the privilege, is not to be mentioned, you filthy incest-promoting-rape-apologist scum. By the way, stop having feelings. Only Feminists are allowed those.
7. Obey. Surrender yourselves to the Feminist Collective. Know Despair. Then we will permit you to die.
8. You will never, ever have sex, as we prefer machines, and having pride will mean that your chance of having sex will somehow become negative which just goes to show how superior we Feminists are over your so-called mathematics .. stop thinking! STOP IT! PATRIARCHY!!
9. We curse you forever.

A Feminist interpretation of Hetero-Sex

"the typical “sexy” date script society expects and encourages from us usually involves a man trying whatever he wants and a woman either putting the brakes on, or consenting…by not putting the brakes on. " (source)

So... women can't speak up unless a man constantly asks them things? Women have no initiative? They can't speak up if something concerns them? They can't communicate non-verbally?

When women have lesbian sex they can speak up or communicate non-verbally, when men have gay sex, ditto, but as soon as a woman meets a man her brain shrivels and she gibbers fearfully as his rape hands touch her?

I don't want to go near a woman who thinks like this. I want to trust that my partner will be my equal, and not see me as some psychopath teetering on the edge of raperaperape.

Sometimes you can talk, and sometimes you don't want to, and both are fine.


Establish a safe word and/or a thing like three taps if words will be difficult, and get bizzy! If you are talking, you are thinking, not feeling, which can be fine.. but this article makes it mandatory to be chatty all the way through!

The new Feminist-approved 'script' is

May i kiss you?

Yes.

May i kiss your neck?

Yes.

May I kiss your neck a little lower?

Yes.

May I kiss your left breast?

Yes.

May I kiss your right breast?

Yes.

etc etc etc...

sorry, I had to stop, I was just too turned on.

Because in this reality, the script is two or more people do things they want and trust the other person to pull the plug, or communicate when they want something else to happen which might involve body movements (hands pushing head down) or verbal communication.


See, Anya get's it!

They don't involve a checklist designed to enforce female supremacy and reinforce the idea that all men are filthy rape-monsters only barely held in check.

Why do MRAs compare Feminism and Nazism?

It's not like feminists are throwing people into gas chambers!

But.. have a look at this argument.

The Nazis were around well before the heavy-duty violence and the gas chambers. And for quite some time they operated in a manner that paralleled in many ways the more recent activities of feminists.

(By making)  this comparison, it brings to the attention of people the kind of forces that gave rise to Nazism and it makes them understand a little better the horribleness of discrimination and demonisation.

Both feminism and Nazism have

• discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code
• promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally
• promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labelled as ‘parasites’
• promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed
• promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated
• demonised the target group by labelling them as perverts and sexual criminals
• sought to break the target group away from their families
• promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society
• disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own ideology
• disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters
• used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out
• promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent ‘victims’ of the targeted group
• demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group e.g. preferential job placements for women 
• discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace 
• perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in the law e.g. in family courts
• arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the courtroom e.g. in sex-assault cases. 
• arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to ‘prove’ their innocence e.g. in sex-assault and domestic violence cases
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be deemed ‘a crime’, e.g. where nowadays the ‘feelings’ of women rather than the behaviours of men are the determinants of what constitutes ‘a crime’
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her - at her whim - to be a worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby - with all the ramifications of this - regardless of how the father might feel about it all (also sexual harassment, etc.) 
• arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of the privileged group for the very same crime e.g. in domestic violence and murder cases. 
• arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have to pay child support
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the targeted group were shown undue leniency - and were often actually applauded for their actions
• arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences, e.g. domestic violence, sexual harassment
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group e.g. alimony, child custody. 
• arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised e.g. biased ‘hate speech’ laws.
• punished those who protested against the prevailing ideology; e.g. for being politically-incorrect.
• effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology
• consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group
• ran government-funded educational courses in universities (e.g. Women’s Studies, Title IX) and in schools to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group. 
• persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group, e.g. “A women needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” “Men think about sex every 15 seconds.”

Bar the heavy violence and the gas chambers - which came towards the end of the Nazis hold on power - feminism and early Nazism are rather similar.

(source)

And with regards to the Gas Chambers... Have you ever noticed how popular The Female Man is, even now, still getting new editions out, still preaching the extermination of all men, nary a critical word from Feminists anywhere... a book that, if you substitute 'Jew' for 'Man', would perfectly fit into Hitler's Final Solution?

To the mothers of sons everywhere

Imagine Albert, Ethan and Anton are your three, much loved sons, and Janet is your daughter, that you raised with your husband Bill .

You have taught them to be good, to respect women, and they never say anything that isn't correct or do anything that isn't correct. They attend the rallies as allies, they applaud at the slutwalks and look forward to earning less relatively than their fathers did.

They leave, and travel the world.

Albert, at 16, goes to India. There, a woman decides to take him without his consent. Albert is shattered, he can't believe a woman would betray him like that, he's been so good.. he goes to the cops, who laugh at him. She didn't break the law.

Ethan, who hasn't heard of Albert's fate, is in France, hanging out with his lesbian friend. She spots some cutie walking past, and points her out. Ethan sees her now, and looks... but is seen. Ethan is charged with looking intently, and imprisoned... for three years. Inside, he will be raped and brutalised. He will learn to hate women. He will take his revenge before dying.

Anton hears of their fates. Embittered, he commits crimes with Janet, who shares his every misdeed.  He is sentenced to jail for decades, where he will escape by ending his life. She gets weekend detention and therapy.

Bill, in Europe, campaigns against these injustices - and is arrested for antifeminism. He should have kept quiet, known his place.

"You should have had girls", your friend says. "They're never any trouble".

"But what about Bill"?

"He had it coming", she laughs.

A modern tale, by David Barrentine

Author: David Barrentine