Feminists ban Milo from Twitter?

http://kukuruyo.com/comic/gamergate-life-83/

"Mostly positive".

4.3/10

on IMDB is "Mostly positive"?

(15 Jul 2016 23:44:21 UTC)

So what do the critics say?


"

Avoid Like The Plague

11 July 2016 | by StoryIsEverything (United Kingdom) – See all my reviews

I went into this movie with an open mind hoping that it would not be as bad as the trailers and TV spots suggest.

It is.

I really wanted this movie to surprise me, to make me laugh to make me care for the characters and have some investment in the story, but it failed to achieve any of that. What I saw was a two hour mess of a movie.

An unfunny, poorly written, poorly edited, contrived cash-in on a beloved classic which has some of the poorest dialogue and worst performances I've seen in a while. The computer generated effects were like something out of a live action Disney picture.

The music, in particular the theme tune was uninspiring and added no impact or energy to the movie.

I honestly can't think of any redeeming qualities that this film has. After waiting so long for a new Ghostbusters film this comes as a major disappointment.

Some things are just best left alone."

Interesting times. The black chick from the Ghostbusters reboot ( Leslie Jones ) was being teased by trolls.

Milo told her that everyone gets that, and not to make a fuss about it, as did myself and quite a few others - "don't feed the trolls" as the saying goes.



 Chanty Binks claims on Twitter that he was guilty of hatecrime. Others accuse him of being an "Uncle Tom", which Leslie supported.

Leslie then tweeted "Black Lives Matters"... because she thinks Milo is a white supremacist or something? As Milo pointed out, not a lot of neo-nazis are fond of fucking black men, so it's a pretty odd accusation!



(Black Lives Matter - unless they are black cops, of course, BLM wants those fuckers shot in the head).




Then Milo's account is closed.

Chanty blocked me after I pointed out that if she had evidence for her claims, she would go to the police.

Feminists do not believe in evidence. They believe in the accusation. That is all they require.

If they accuse a man, he should be destroyed; "Listen and Believe"!

 If Milo was guilty of sending the nasty tweets - the police would investigate. Instead, Feminists like Chanty used the opportunity to silence a critic.



Feminists hate Free Speech, and they will always play upon the natural love of men for women - despite the claim that men hate women.

They will play the hapless, weak, Damsel in Distress - despite claiming to be the equals of men.

 Then they will propose the solution to the "harassment of women" is that Feminists be given the power of censorship - and instead of targeting the actual trolls, they will go after their political opponents.

Every person outside of Social Justice is being given a choice. Bend the knee, obey your masters - or we will silence you.

Why does that sound familiar?


Feminists and Islamists, yet again, prove they are birds of a feather. They exploit loopholes ruthlessly to destroy their critics.

This is soft fascism.

It relies on the tendency of the general public to forget the accumulation of small repressive actions, so that they can turn the world into a giant police state little by little.




We cannot allow them to get away with this.

Jewish refugees being marched away by British police at Croydon airport in March 1939.

They were put on a flight to Warsaw. (source)

#freemilo Because if we don't fight together against this, it will be us next.

So @jack and @twitter are willing to let the racist tweets of #BlackLivesMatter but a gay conservative? #FreeMilo pic.twitter.com/Oe45Xa52B9

— Spike (@Spikey_Buddy) July 20, 2016

[I did have a list of Leslie's tweets about Milo, ShoeOnHead, BLM etc but it looks like Tumblr has censored them. Yes, I was an idiot for not copying them when I had a chance]

Mundane Matt's view on this:

Paul Joseph Watson's view:

"Leslie Jones ADMITS she incites targeted harassment of Twitter users."

Double Standards: Leslie Jones’ Racist Twitter History.

Leslie claims she was hacked but she seems to have a long history of racist behaviour. She also seems happy to do exactly the behaviour that Milo is alleged to have been banned for - inciting a mob to harass the people she doesn't like.

Should laws be passed to suppress certain types of anti-feminism?

Surely this is an outrageous question? Didn't we fight wars in which millions of people died, fighting for the freedom to speak the truth as they saw it?

Apparently they died for nothing...



"not at all, it would go underground and people need to know it exists in order to oppose it and prevent it from growing. "

Hmm... yeah, that sounds comforting... so opposing feminism is the equivalent of belonging to some sort of dangerous cult... people don't even talk that way about the KKK and they killed people..

"MNL_1221 answered 1 month ago
We already have some books that suppress certain types of anti-feminism: namely, laws that prohibit job discrimination, sexual harassment, unfair treatment of rape victims (such as prosecutors asking a rape victim during a trial about her past sexual experience), and such."

So opposing feminism is the equivalent of sexual harassment or discriminating against job applicants? But they are right about the rape trials; it's a venue where a male is presumed guilty and the accuser given elevated status.

"However, because of the First Amendment and Freedom of Speech, I don't think you can pass laws preventing anti-feminists from expressing their opinion about women's place in the world. They are free to express their thoughts, and so are those who disagree with them."

Damn shame.

"That said, certain rules in certain organizations--Yahoo!, for instance--allow some organizations to censor speech that they find hateful. Also, the media has rules and laws concerning certain types of speech that may hurt or offend others."

But here's a loophole we can use to suppress free speech! Yay!

"However, speech meant to incite violence against others--such as calling for violence against women who don't "tow the line"--would be censorable and prosecutable. "

"speech meant to incite violence against males"... that's not worth mentioning. Heck, they deserve it! It's "*fabulous*", to quote Sharon Osbourne.

"Freedom of speech should not mean freedom to defame. "

Yes, it should.. if it's true. Truth must be an absolute protection. If Richard Nixon is a crook, and I'm arrested for saying that, then what freedom do I have?

"dark eyes answered 1 month ago
No. In their manner of getting their cause "out" they are inadvertently indicating the necessity of the feminist movement!

Because arguing against National Socialism is proof we need National Socialism!

"They're burying themselves. They cuss, they threat, they go around with this "she has that,I want it, too" attitude."

How dare they demand equality from an organisation that claims it is about equality! Don't they realise it's equality only when it benefits women?

"They want the rights of having a uterus, without having a uterus."

Strawman. I don't recall any man demanding the right have a womb. Except maybe in Life of Brian...

"They want to rid lower standards, affirmative action, then complain women are weak, emotional, etc... then complain we DON'T take the dangerous, deadly jobs! "

This paragraph is incoherent.

Yes, we want to rid lower standards of education for men,
Yes, we want to rid lower standards of healthcare for men,
Yes, we want to rid lower standards of justice for men,
Yes, we want to rid lower standards of social value for men.

We are right to complain when women want to be paid the same as a man doing a dangerous job, without taking the same risks. That's anti-capitalism at it's finest. Even communist countries gave the worst jobs some sort of incentives.

You know what they call forcing a group to do the dangerous stuff without rewards?

Slavery.

And so on and so on.

finally, check these three links:


Google Inc., YouTube LLC: Categorize the MRM as flaggable for terrorism/promoting hate on YouTube.

Colleges offer credit to students who enter ‘feminist thinking’ into Wikipedia
NORDIC TAXPAYER FUNDED REPORT DEMANDS ANTI-FEMINIST VIEWS BE DEEMED ‘HATE SPEECH’ AND CRIMINALIZED

People are saying YES and doing their best to make it so that people like me will be silenced or imprisoned. Every mention of us will be controlled through wikipedia et al so that we will be defined by our enemies; or outright *erased*.

MRAs and Feminists are just as bad as each other?

One accusation is that MRAs are misogynistic.

Looking at the

Canadian Association for Equality

Umm, yeah, so much hatred... overpowering... me.



There's zero. Zip. Feminism <> female. Hating Feminism has nothing to do with hating females.

Unless  Karen Straughan hates herself? I suppose that's possible. I haven't seen anything like that on any video but I haven't seen all of them.

Feel free to watch and find her out, and chat with her. She's pretty reasonable, and unlikely to call you a rapist, or even a rape apologist, just because you disagree with her. Unlike some feminists. "Even if you’ve never raped anybody before, you’ve got the consciousness of a rapist, and you’re part of the problem." 

What about the shouty dude, The Amazing Atheist?

For all his bluster, I'm not sure he really hates anything, but i suppose it's possible. Can you find anything he says that hates women specifically? Well, it might be difficult because a lot of his were taken down after an attack by a feminist group.

Because feminist groups do that openly. They even got the BBC involved.

What does misogyny mean? According to MRAs, it means this.






What does misandry mean? According to Feminism, it means this.

It's all about hatred.

Well, do men laugh at women getting castrated? Are there Hollywood movies about women getting punched in the tits and kicked in the clit? Is that a punchline... ever?



What about books? There's feminist literature like "The Female Man", with many positive reviews that claim it's a feminist literary work, and which also advocates the extermination of all males. Even male apes are raped for entertainment.

What about male feminists? Are they misandrystic? Does the use of rape slander against opponents count?

And MRAs disrupt meetings of feminists, right? We stand outside with loudspeakers? Trigger fire alarms? Harangue them afterwards?

So where's the equivalent?

Both sides at fault, right? Right?

Tell me when men do this and get away with it.