Why do people compare Feminism to... Nazism?!!

mr-cappadocia:

nextyearsgirl:

He’s now compared radfems to Nazis and himself to a Jew so I’m pretty certain nothing’s going to top that. Night, tumblr!

Feminists such as yourself have been chipping away at the rights of men for decades now.

And I’m talking actual rights. Like the presumption of innocence. For example, Feminists have mandated that when police make an arrest in a domestic violence dispute (which they pretty much have to do whenever there’s a call) they have to take things like weight and height into consideration.

As in all other things being equal the party that is taller and weighs more is the one you arrest.

You’re okay with this.

We’re talking about the kangaroo courts set up by Title IX at the behest of Feminists that allows “people” (read: men) on college campuses to be tried and convicted of sexual assault using the lowest standard of evidence.

But don’t take my word for it… take it from a fellow Feminist:

How does this campus tribunal proceed to evaluate the accusations? Upon what evidence is it able to make a judgment?

The frightening answer is that like the proverbial 800-pound gorilla, the tribunal does pretty much whatever it wants, showing scant regard for fundamental fairness, due process of law, and the well-established rules and procedures that have evolved under the Constitution for citizens’ protection.

Who knew that American college students are required to surrender the Bill of Rights at the campus gates?

My son was given written notice of the charges against him, in the form of a letter from the campus Title IX officer. But instead of affording him the right to be fully informed, the separately listed allegations were a barrage of vague statements, rendering any defense virtually impossible. The letter lacked even the most basic information about the acts alleged to have happened years before. Nor were the allegations supported by any evidence other than the word of the ex-girlfriend.


The hearing itself was a two-hour ordeal of unabated grilling by the school’s committee, during which, my son later reported, he was expressly denied his request to be represented by counsel or even to have an attorney outside the door of the room. The questioning, he said, ran far afield even from the vaguely stated allegations contained in the so-called notice. Questions from the distant past, even about unrelated matters, were flung at him with no opportunity for him to give thoughtful answers.

The many pages of written documentation that my son had put together—which were directly on point about his relationship with his accuser during the time period of his alleged wrongful conduct—were dismissed as somehow not relevant.

What was relevant, however, according to the committee, was the unsworn testimony of “witnesses” deemed to have observable knowledge about the long-ago relationship between my son and his accuser.

This is what happens with Feminists in power. Nazi Germany didn’t begin with the ovens.

It began with dehumanization. Something your movement pushes for at every opportunity.

Just look at the way you and yours talk about everything even vaguely related to men. You have absolute contempt for me. You don’t view me as an equal. You never will. I could offer you everything you’ve ever asked for and it wouldn’t be enough for you. I could give every concession and it wouldn’t be enough.

I could let you sheer off a pound of flesh and you’d ask for another. Because that’s how hate based movements operate. They don’t stop. They can’t stop. They aren’t fueled by a desire for a better life. Or equality. Or justice. Or hope.

They’re fueled by hate… and if I denied you anything you’d just use that to justify your hatred… and if I gave you anything you’d claim that I was showing weakness and now was the time, once and for all, to put the knife to my throat.

Because that’s how movements like yours have always operated. It hasn’t changed.

So when I describe you in the same breath as one does Nazi Germany it’s because you have the same mentality.

Do you think curtailing my rights would be enough? Denying me support would be enough? Putting me in prison under the thinnest of pretenses? Would that be enough?
No, of course not. And we both know it.

You don’t view me as human. You never will. That’s why I can point out to you no man in America actually has reproductive rights and the *very first thing you think about* is “Rapist”.

Reblogged 2 hours ago from mr-cappadocia (Originally from nextyearsgirl)

35 notes

Source: nextyearsgirl

Why do MRAs compare Feminism and Nazism?

It's not like feminists are throwing people into gas chambers!

But.. have a look at this argument.

The Nazis were around well before the heavy-duty violence and the gas chambers. And for quite some time they operated in a manner that paralleled in many ways the more recent activities of feminists.

(By making)  this comparison, it brings to the attention of people the kind of forces that gave rise to Nazism and it makes them understand a little better the horribleness of discrimination and demonisation.

Both feminism and Nazism have

• discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code
• promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally
• promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labelled as ‘parasites’
• promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed
• promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated
• demonised the target group by labelling them as perverts and sexual criminals
• sought to break the target group away from their families
• promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society
• disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own ideology
• disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters
• used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out
• promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent ‘victims’ of the targeted group
• demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group e.g. preferential job placements for women 
• discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace 
• perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in the law e.g. in family courts
• arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the courtroom e.g. in sex-assault cases. 
• arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to ‘prove’ their innocence e.g. in sex-assault and domestic violence cases
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be deemed ‘a crime’, e.g. where nowadays the ‘feelings’ of women rather than the behaviours of men are the determinants of what constitutes ‘a crime’
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her - at her whim - to be a worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby - with all the ramifications of this - regardless of how the father might feel about it all (also sexual harassment, etc.) 
• arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of the privileged group for the very same crime e.g. in domestic violence and murder cases. 
• arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have to pay child support
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the targeted group were shown undue leniency - and were often actually applauded for their actions
• arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences, e.g. domestic violence, sexual harassment
• arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group e.g. alimony, child custody. 
• arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised e.g. biased ‘hate speech’ laws.
• punished those who protested against the prevailing ideology; e.g. for being politically-incorrect.
• effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology
• consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group
• ran government-funded educational courses in universities (e.g. Women’s Studies, Title IX) and in schools to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group. 
• persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group, e.g. “A women needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” “Men think about sex every 15 seconds.”

Bar the heavy violence and the gas chambers - which came towards the end of the Nazis hold on power - feminism and early Nazism are rather similar.

(source)

And with regards to the Gas Chambers... Have you ever noticed how popular The Female Man is, even now, still getting new editions out, still preaching the extermination of all men, nary a critical word from Feminists anywhere... a book that, if you substitute 'Jew' for 'Man', would perfectly fit into Hitler's Final Solution?