From https://archive.is/CH38a
Saved from http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/feminism/2016/04/why-do-we-give-robots-female-names-because-we-dont-want-consider-their 24
Apr 2016 18:47:19 UTC
 |
| Tay's avatar. Feminists cannot tell the difference between this and a human female. Because Feminists are fucking mental. |
"Why do we give robots female names?"
We give them all sorts of names. Why, in particular, do we need to exclude female names?
Almost all robots had sexless names. A few have had male names. Some have female names. A feminist hears the latter and screams with fury. They don't have female names? Sexist. They do? Also sexist.
"Because we don't want to consider their feelings"
They don't have any feelings. Which you would know had you done a few seconds of research. Why do people take you seriously? Why are you given this space to write in the first place?
"How we gender robots is not an abstract, academic issue"
It's not an issue at all, in fact, except in the minds of complete maniacs.
 | |
| http://world.honda.com/ASIMO/history/ |
"the link between how we treat "fembots" and human women is real."
Oh? About as real as the way we treat ships and women? We've called ships by female names for centuries - no doubt because we haven't paid attention to their feelings either.
"Why are so many robots designed to resemble women? "
 |
| Won't somebody please think of the poor cylons? |
"The question is becoming inescapable as more and more AIs"
Currently the total sum of AIs is zero. As it was yesterday, and will be tomorrow. Apparently, addition is also beyond you. We have, at best, clever agents, with around the IQ of a cockroach.
 |
| One of the first digital assistants. Clearly it was a female dog, because programmers hate women! |
"which do not need to have a gender" ... the things which don't exist don't need to have anything at all.
But gender is not connected to the body - that's a fundamental tenet of Feminism. You are looking at these attributes and imposing a gender on them, because you want to twist every fucking thing to your victim narrative.
" appear on the market with female voices and female faces, including Microsoft’s Cortana, Amazon’s Alexa and a new wave of uncannily lifelike sexbots"
"sexbots"?
"sexbots" looking like women.. are bad?
 |
| If a man wants to fuck something that looks like a human woman, it's because they hate women? |
 |
| If you want to fuck something that looks like only a section of a human male anatomy, well, that means you are strong and empowered! Right on, sister! Female sexuality good! Male sexuality bad! |
And that's not counting the women who are attracted to human women as well. Oh, but lesbian sexuality is a-ok - it's only male sexuality Feminist despise.
Ms Penny doesn't give a fuck about all the bots that look like human men. The machines that are only chunks of a male anatomy - they are just fine. But for one to resemble a human female - that's blasphemy! Burn them!!!
Feminists have no problem with male sexbots.
BULLSHIT
Why do Feminists hate heterosexuality?
" Microsoft launched Tay, a bot with the face and mannerisms of a teenage girl"
How the hell does Tay look like a teenage girl? It doesn't look like anything. It's software, with an avatar pic that could be pretty much anything, including a male. Oh right - Penny wants it to be a victim, so she projects qualities onto it. I'm surprised she hasn't claimed it was raped by evil manbeasts.
"Within hours, Tay had been bombarded with sexual abuse"
Oh fuck, she did, she did! She did claim it was raped by the evil manbeasts! Haha! God, she's pathetic.
How the Hell can you abuse something incapable of feeling pain or even discomfort?
"and taught to defend Hitler"
It PARROTS any shit you throw at it - it's not learnt anything. The joke is that you can make it say anything under the sun - it's only funny if those things it says are unacceptable.
"which is what happens when you give Twitter a baby to raise"
 | |
| A baby. Feminists, study this until you can recognise one in future. |
 |
| Tay. A computer program running on a server. Feminists cannot tell the difference between this and a human baby. Because Feminists are fucking mental. |
"the earliest bots and digital assistants were designed to appear female"
 |
| Apparently Microsoft Clippy was female.... because misogyny... how much brain damage does it take to come to that conclusion? |
"so that users, who were presumed to be male, could exploit them without guilt"
HOW THE FUCK ... WHAT THE FUCK...
Ok. she's a moron.
She truly believes we should feel guilty for using software.
"Right now, as we’re anticipating the creation of AIs"
So you admit that they do not actually exist, and it's not a matter of idiocy, it's a matter of Penny being a fucking LIAR.
And we're done.
Take it away, Microsoft Bob!
Further Reading:
Why computer voices are mostly female
"It's a well-established phenomenon that the human brain is developed to like female voices." (This liking of female voices is immediately interpreted as a hared of all women everywhere by feminists, because raisins.)
No comments:
Post a Comment