70% of unprovoked domestic violence is by women

" A new Harvard Medical School study of 11,000 men and women has confirmed the CDC’s data and found that 50% of Domestic Violence was reciprocal. But the study also found that when violence was one-sided, meaning unprovoked, 70% of the time it was the women who committed violence against the men."


Whitaker DJ, et al. “Differences in Frequency of Violence
And Reported Injury between Relationships with
Reciprocal and Nonreciprocal Intimate Partner Violence,”
American Journal of Public Health (May 2007): Vol. 97, No. 5, pp. 941-947

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17395835

https://archive.is/eQRTv

Related Stories:

1. Duluth and the VAWA: "Power and Control"
2. Where Are All These Abused Men?
3. The pain of Aboriginal men abused by their women
4. The Duluth Model of Misandry
5. Intimate Partner Violence
6. Why are so many middle class wives beating up their husbands?

Feminists believe men are unnecessary for reproduction?

Click to enlarge

They claim research has succeeded in proving female-female reproduction is just as good. They are typically lax on providing references, so I dug around and found they are probably thinking of this

"Saitou and Hayashi have found that the offspring generated by their technique usually seem to be healthy and fertile, but the PGCs themselves are often not completely 'normal'.

For example, the second-generation PGCs often produce eggs that are fragile, misshapen and sometimes dislodged from the complex of cells that supports them.

When fertilized, the eggs often divide into cells with three sets of chromosomes rather than the normal two, and the rate at which the artificial PGCs successfully produce offspring is only one-third of the rate for normal in vitro fertilization (IVF). Yi Zhang, who studies epigenetics at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, and who has been using Saitou's method, has also found that in vitro PGCs do not erase their previous epigenetic programming as well as naturally occurring PGCs. “We have to be aware that these are PGC-like cells and not PGCs,” he says."

So this is after *one* generation. Generational errors accumulate. Some feminists plan to do this over and over and over... the result will be a freaking nightmare. If they had their way, this would be the only method of reproduction - and humanity would become extinct.

The Blurred Lines of Feminist Double Standards

beaconsoftomorrow

(  adapted from
http://beaconsoftomorrow.tumblr.com/post/65005272570/so-theres-a-post-asking-women-who-are-offended)

So, there’s a post asking women who are offended by Blurred Lines to reblog it. It started at about 190 notes when I first saw it in my first class. By the next class it reached over 70,000 notes. Damn. The men’s version only has around 1,000 notes.

Anyways, this got me to thinking. Obviously women are more offended by songs about women. But were there going to be people getting mad that more men weren’t offended? I thought to myself for a while and realized that there are a lot of songs I enjoy that involve men being killed, stalked or beaten.

So, I have to ask, if Blurred Lines is offensive, what about these songs?









And these music videos:

Systematic oppression against men?

Reblogged from Anti-feminism-pro-equality

Men have it rough in the workplace

• Men are 93% of industrial deaths and accident (NIOSH)
  
• Even though murder is the leading workplace cause of death for women, a statistic often used by gender feminists, that number is only a percentage of the 6% of workplace deaths that women comprise.  In other words, a fraction of a small fraction.
  
• One example:
  
  Between 1890 and 1917, two hundred thirty thousand (230,000) [male] railroad workers were killed. One of the most dangerous jobs was “brakeman.”  Each car had to be stopped manually and it was the brakeman’s job to stop four or five cars.  The brakeman walked on top of the RR cars and turned a wheel, putting the brakes “on” for each car.  It was not unheard of for a brakeman to be thrown from the top of a RR car.
  
  Source:  Freight Trains, Modern Marvels, The History Channel, 2006

Men die more often from unnatural causes than women

• Men are:
  
      76% of homicide victims – DOJ
  
      80% of Suicide victims – CDC
  
• Also:
  
  Suicide ranks 11th among causes of death in the US, with 30,622 completed suicides in 2001. It is the 3rd leading cause of death among people 15 to 24 yr. Men ≥ 75 yr have the highest rate of death by suicide. Among all age groups, male deaths by suicide outnumber female deaths by 4:1.”
  
  • http://www.merck.com/mmpe/sec15/ch205/ch205a.html
    
• “The other most common suicide victims are divorced and/or estranged fathers like Derrick Miller. In fact, a divorced father is ten times more likely to commit suicide than a divorced mother, and three times more likely to commit suicide than a married father.
  
  • http://www.glennsacks.com/distraught_fathers_courthouse.htm
  
  ~Suicide took the lives of 30,622 people in 2001 (CDC 2004).
  ~Suicide is the eighth leading cause of death for all U.S. men (Anderson and Smith 2003).
  ~24,672 suicide deaths reported among men in 2001
  ~24,672 / 30,622 = .8056952
  ~In other words, over 80% of all suicide deaths were male.
  
  • http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/suifacts.htm
• Of the top fifteen leading causes of death, men lead in 12 categories, are tied in two and trail in one.  Even though more women die of heart disease each year, men die of heart disease many years earlier.
  
  • http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/finaldeaths03_tables.pdf
  • http://www.sentencingproject.org/Admin/Documents/publications/inc_factsaboutprisons.pdf

Men are the overwhelming majority of rape victims

• Male rape has been called “The most closely guarded secret of American prisons.” (Weiss and Friar 1974)
  
  There are estimated to be over 300,000 male rapes per year in American prisons and jails.
  
  • http://www.loompanics.com/Articles/RapeInPrison.html
    
• Meanwhile A United Nations statistical report compiled from government sources showed that more than 250,000 cases of male-female rape or attempted rape were recorded by police annually. The reported data covered 65 countries.
  
  • http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap_percap-crime-rapes-per-capita
    
• According to the 2009 United States National Crime Victimization Survey estimates, only 55% of rapes and sexual assaults were reported to law enforcement officials. When a male is raped, less than 10% are believed to be reported. Female-male and female-female rape are ignored altogether in this survey.
  
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Crime_Victimization_Survey

Other facts regarding men and rape:

• 2.1% of men reported forced vaginal sex compared to 1.6% of women in a relationship in the previous year. From: Predictors of Sexual Coersion.
  
  • http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID45-PR45.pdf
    
    
• 94% of sexually abused youth in correctional facilities reported being abused by female staff. From: Sexual Victimization in Juvenile Facilities, 2008-09.
  
  • http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/svjfry09.pdf
• Among inmates reporting staff sexual misconduct, ~ 65% reported a female aggressor. From: Sexual Victimization in Prisons and Jails Reported by Inmates, 2008-09.
  
  • http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/svpjri0809.pdf
• 50% of homeless youth reported being sexually abused by a female. From: It’s Not What You Think: Sexually Exploited Youth in British Columbia
  
  • http://www.nursing.ubc.ca/PDFs/ItsNotWhatYouThink.pdf

Men get screwed over in divorce and custody courts

• A woman is the party filing for divorce in about 66% of divorce cases.
  
  “How often was it that many more of women wanted the divorce more than the men?
  2/3. The same as the amount responsible for divorce filings. And yet another study of divorced couples found that the majority of divorced wives and husbands both agreed it was the wife who wanted out.”
  
  • http://www.pobronson.com/blog/2006/07/will-this-marriage-last-who-wants-out.html
• Women receive custody in about 84% of child custody cases.
  
  In the spring of 2002, an estimated 13.4 million parents had custody of 21.5 million children under 21 years of age whose other parent lived somewhere else. About 5 of every 6 custodial parents were mothers (84.4 percent) and 1in 6 were fathers (15.6 percent), proportions statistically unchanged since 1994
  
  • http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p60-225.pdf

According to Los Angeles divorce consultant Jayne Major:

“Divorced men are often devastated by the loss of their children. It’s a little known fact that in the United States men initiate only a small number of the divorces involving children. Most of the men I deal with never saw their divorces coming, and they are often treated very unfairly by the family courts.’”

• Paternity fraud is rampant in the U.S.
  
  30% of those named as fathers who test for paternity find they are not the biological father.
  
  • http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=48871xo
• Not only is all this imbalance around marriage and children unfair to men, we must also consider that the damaged inflicted on fatherless children is staggering:
  
      63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes (US Dept. Of Health/Census) – 5 times the average.
  
      90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average.
  
      85% of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Center for Disease Control)
  
      80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes –14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26)
  
      71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report)
  
      75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes – 10 times the average. (Rainbows for All God’s Children)
  
      70% of youths in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sept. 1988)
  
      85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction)
  
  • http://fallenfathers.blogspot.com/2007/03/children-without-fathers-statistics.html

Men are often screwed over in the Justice System as well.

• There is blatant anti-male discrimination in the criminal justice system and the sentencing disparity between men and women exceeds that between whites and any other minority.
  
  • http://ncfm.org/2011/04/issues/criminal-sentencing/
• Avg sentences for crime by gender:
  
  Female – 18.51 months
  Male – 51.52 months
  
  • http://www.terry.uga.edu/~mustard/sentencing.pdf
    
• “Judge bashes Probation Department for gender bias in favor of leniency for girls”
  
  • http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-12-01/news/27082827_1_gender-bias-probation-officers-probation-department
• The 2006 United States’ rate of incarceration of 751 inmates per 100,000 population is the highest reported rate in the world, well ahead of the Russian rate of 628 per 100,000.
  
  93% of the prison population is male with over 60% having no High School education.   America has now passed Russia as the country that has the largest percentage of its population incarcerated, yet we still claim to be the freest country on earth.
  
  The number of persons on probation and parole has been growing dramatically along with institutional populations. There are now 7.2 million Americans incarcerated or on probation or parole, an increase of more than 290 percent since 1980.
  
  • http://www.sentencingproject.org/
• The problem of sentencing disparities is compounded by an epidemic of false accusations:
  
  205 (and growing) wrongly convicted people have been exonerated by DNA evidence since the beginning of the Innocence Project.
  
  204 of the wrongly convicted were men.
  
  Most of them were falsely imprisoned for rape.
  
  • http://www.innocenceproject.org/
• As we saw in the Duke Lacrosse rape case  fiasco, false accusers are rarely prosecuted and when they are it is only as a misdemeanor (at most), while rape itself is vigorously prosecuted as a felony. The Duke false accuser, Crystal Gayle Mangum went on to commit assault, arson and finally murder before authorities made a good faith intervention.
  
  One attorney speaking at premiere for the movie, After Innocence, estimates that there are between 20,000 and 100,000 wrongly convicted still in prison.
  
  Valid research puts the estimated false rape reporting rate at 41%
  
  • http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/p/prevalence-of-false-rape-claims.html

Capital Punishments Target Men Almost Exclusively

• Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, there have been over 1,200 executions in the United States. Eleven of them, or less than 1%, were women. This stands in stark contrast considering women commit, by DOJ estimates, 10% of all murders, are involved in 35% of all domestic homicides (are involved often means they get other people to kill for them) and nearly 30% of murders where the victim was another family member.

Other:

• We hear a lot about the historical oppression of women’s voting rights, but few if any women who were born in the 20th century were every without the right to vote in their lifetime, upon reaching legal voting age.  On the other hand, around 2400 hundred California men (42% of CA men killed in Vietnam) gave their life for their country without being allowed by their country to vote.  The exact number is 2,381.  Four of the twelve Iwo Jimo flag raisers died for their country without their country ever allowing them the right to vote.
  • http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/a-b/blumhorst/2005/blumhorst052805.htm
  • http://www.thewall-usa.com/names.asp
• “The youngest Vietnam KIA is believed to be Dan Bullock USMC, at 15 years old.
  At least 5 men killed in Vietnam were 16 years old.
  At least 12 men killed in Vietnam were 17 years old.
  There are 120 persons who listed foreign countries as their home of record.
  At least 25,000 of those killed were 20 years old or younger.
  The oldest man killed was 62 years old.”
  
  If you do a full count on all the men in the 20th century who died for their country without being allowed to vote the numbers will be staggering.
  
  In America there are over 270 women’s commissions, but only one for men in New Hampshire.
  
  There are over 700 Women’s Studies programs on colleges and universities throughout the United States teaching thousands or tens of thousands of classes from the gender feminist perspective, but not one program or class, teaching men’s studies from the masculist perspective.
  
  Men are fully half of the victims  of domestic violence (26% of intimate partner homicides), yet are denied service at most tax payer funded domestic violence shelters.
  
  The CDC reports that in cases of non-reciprocal intimate partner violence (one directional) that women are more than twice as likely to be the aggressor. The report cites that women comprise 70% of perpetrators, men 29%.
  
  In the largest collection of studies on intimate partner violence known, Martin Fiebert of the California State University, Longbeach offers the following:
  
  SUMMARY:  This bibliography examines 286 scholarly investigations: 221 empirical studies and 65 reviews and/or analyses, which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners.  The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 371,600.
  
  • http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
• In another study the CDC lists male victims of domestic violence at more than 34%, but men injured in Iraq (and all other men) are by law in California excluded from domestic violence shelter services. Only one shelter in Lancaster, CA accepts men and it has been extensively harassed for doing so.
  
  That harassment is a systemic problem with origins that emanate from academe. Dr. Murray Straus, an internationally recognized expert on intimate partner violence published the following paper outlining the various ways that feminist ideologues suppress data and research on IPV that demonstrates gender symmetry in its incidence.
  
  • http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf
• Men are subject to extreme discrimination in healthcare.
  
  Men today die on average 6 years sooner than women.  In 1920 the variance was one year.  The death rates for prostate and breast cancer are similar, but because men die of other things more frequently-accidents ,war, heart disease etc., there are fewer men left to die of prostate cancer.  This is akin to saying people from a nation like Zimbabwe are immune to Alzheimer’s- but in fact they die of other things before they can get old enough to contract Alzheimer’s.
  
  To date, there are numerous federal offices on women’s health, and not a single one for men. Also, the lion’s share of gender specific medical research is done on behalf of women.
  
  Men and boys are suffering decline in the educational system. Department of Education graph:
  
  Boys are facing a significantly harder time in early education than girls. Yet girls, from primary education through college still benefit from many more special programs designed to help them gain “equality” with males.
  
  • http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/08/boys/factsheets/ed/index.shtml

Some info on the wage gap

• The wage gap myth based on the “comparable worth” paradigm:
  
  • The wage gap myth based on the “comparable worth” paradigm:
  • http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/04/23/gender-feminist-wage-gap-myth-appears-to-be-growing-legs-part-ii/
• While men make more money than women on average, women control and spend vastly more money than men.
  
  • http://www.amazon.com/Pocketbook-Power-Hearts-Coveted-Consumer/dp/0071418601/sr=1-1/qid=1167804358/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-6478055-3977644?ie=UTF8&s=books
• Women as an economically disadvantaged group is a myth that negatively affects men.
  
  Not too long ago, legendary adman David Ogilvy chided his peers for talking down to women. He berated those who ignored women or discounted them, misconstruing men’s higher paychecks to mean greater spending clout. And he was right. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, women–who comprise just over 51 percent of the U.S. population, making them the largest consumer segment in the country–control six trillion dollars in buying power annually. Statistics show that:
  
  Women make 88 percent of all U.S. retail purchases. Some experts even predict that, by 2020, women will control most of the money in America.
  
  Women control 88 percent of all purchases.
  
  Women handle 75 percent of family finances. 43 percent of those with assets over $500,000 are women.
  
  Women influence two out of every three of the 3 trillion dollars spent in the U.S. each year!
  
  From the Sisters4Sisters Yellow Pages:
  
      Women are starting businesses at twice the rate of men.
  
      One out of every 11 American women owns her own business.
  
      Currently there are over 10.6 million women-owned businesses employing 19.1 million people and generating $2.5 trillion in sales.
  
      Women make or influence over 85% of all purchasing decisions.
  
      In 2010, women have the majority of wealth in America.
  
  Men pay the majority of social security taxes and are outlived by six years by women, but the government makes no fair adjustment to how those funds are distributed.
  
  In summary, men experience systematic discrimination in parenting, domestic violence policies, education, criminal sentencing, paternity, forced labor, military conscription, public health policies, genital integrity, false accusations, reproductive rights, portrayal by the media and in the coverage of their issues by the news media.
  
  Misandry is often expressed through racism.
  
  From Scottsboro An American Tragedy.
  
  “The protection of white womanhood, it might be the pivot around all Southern culture. Of the 5,000 people who were lynched from 1880 to 1940, most were black men accused of raping or sexually assaulting white women.” – Robin Kelly, Historian
  
  From American Man
  
  “In 1931, two white women stepped from a boxcar in Paint Rock, Alabama to make a shocking accusation: they had been raped by nine black teenagers on the train.” … ”- a poor white woman whose lie lends her respectability…”
  PBS Home Video
  
  Scottsboro An American Tragedy
  The case that sparked the civil rights movement
  
  As we have seen with the “war on drugs,” legislation like VAWA, primary aggressor laws, mandatory arrest laws and the like have a disproportionately negative effect on minorities and other low income populations.
  
  • http://ncfm.org/libraryfiles/Children/DV/AAVRmandatArrestVAWA.pdf
• Or the differences in healthcare for men and women in Obamacare program
  
  • http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2013/05/14/obamacare-kicks-young-men-while-theyre-down/
  • http://www.ahip.org/MillimanReportACA2013/
  • http://www.ahip.org/Workarea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2147491347
  • http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/14/news/economy/obamacare-premiums/index.html?iid=HP_LN
• Young men will be the biggest losers in the transition to Obamacare. Reports estimate that males as a whole will see:
  
      11% increase in insurance premiums compared to 9% drop in females
  
      Men under 40 will face 18% - 31% insurance hikes compared to females under 40 13% to 19% decrease
  
      Young men ages 25-36 will could face insurance premiums of 50% or more compared to young females 25-29 who will see 4% increase

Gender wage gap and STEM links

1. http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/
   
2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250672504707048.html
   
3. http://money.howstuffworks.com/gender-gap1.htm
   
4. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-13/don-t-blame-discrimination-for-gender-wage-gap.html
   
5. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/davidgreen/9666597/The_gender_pay_gap_does_not_exist/
   
6. http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf
   
7. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/
   
8. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-gender-wage-gap-is-a-myth-2012-07-26
   
9. http://www.businessinsider.com/actually-the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-a-myth-2011-3?op=1
   
10. http://oratorasaurus.tumblr.com/post/41131660349/the-so-called-pay-gap
    
11. http://tgjesusfreak.tumblr.com/post/59991585178
    
12. http://wwww.examiner.com/x-22884-Canada-Politics-Examiner~y2010m2d22-Gender-pay-gap-is-not-what-activists-claim
    
13. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/vickiwoods/7957186/Sorry-ladies-Im-not-worried-about-wage-gaps.html
    
14. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/opinion/22Sommers.html?_r=1&hp
    
15. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/09/the_wage_gap_myth.html
    
16. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qa3pKN3XUKM&feature=youtu.be
    
17. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/06/business/economy/06women.html?_r=2
    
18. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/biggest-shock-fridays-payroll-report-sorry-men
    
19. http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/07/share-of-men-in-labor-force-at-all-time-low/?src=recg
    
20. http://www.businessinsider.com/women-in-tech-make-more-money-and-land-better-jobs-than-men-20
    
21. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedType=R
    
22. http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=10630664
    
23. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
    
24. http://www.ksee24.com/news/local/Young-Women-Earn-More-159818705.html
    
25. http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,2015274,00.html
    
26. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/03/14/jobs-where-women-earn-more-than-men/
    
27. http://www.womenintechnology.co.uk/news/young-women-earn-more-than-men%E2%80%94news-800761492
    
28. http://www.womensviewsonnews.org/2011/10/young-women-now-earn-more-than-men-in-uk/
    
29. http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feedTy%E2%80%A6
    
30. http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/03/15/optout.revolution/
    
31. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23413243
    
32. http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/Careers/06/13/dads.work/index.html
    
33. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-04-equal-parenting_N.htm
    
34. http://www.sify.com/news/women-stay-away-from-math-out-of-their-own-free-choice-news-scitech-kk1lubiiiee.html
    
35. http://www.science20.com/news_articles/women_science_no_discrimination_says_cornell_study-75984

EU to ban antifeminist speech

"“Group libel” means: defamatory comments made in public and aimed against a group as defined in paragraph (a) – or members thereof – with a view to inciting to violence, slandering the group, holding it to ridicule or subjecting it to false charges."

So ridiculing feminism is a crime? People ridicule political movements they oppose all the time; why is feminism so privileged that it cannot even be criticised?

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/11_revframework_statute_/11_revframework_statute_en.pdf – The European framework national statute for the promotion of tolerance – full text (in English)

And since when did feminism prove it's points? Is the Patriarchy Hypothesis something that's ever been subjected to rigorous examination?

Well, it can't be after this is passed. That would be "subjecting it to false charges". Charging it with being wrong, or actively deceitful.

So who gets to decide what's a true charge and what's false? It does.

Judge, jury and executioner all in one.

Discussion here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/suggested-reading/eu-to-ban-anti-feminist-speech/

Amazon et al promise to purge filth from the world...

Retailer Amazon has removed several abuse-themed e-books from its Kindle Store after a report highlighted titles depicting rape, incest and bestiality.

So... I wonder if they'll go after this book?

Genesis 4:16-17

And Cain went out from the face of the Lord, and dwelt as a fugitive on the earth, at the east side of Eden. And Cain knew his wife, and she conceived, and brought forth Henoch: and he built a city, and called the name thereof by the name of his son Henoch. -

Genesis 20:12-13

 Howbeit, otherwise also she is truly my sister, the daughter of my father, and not the daughter of my mother, and I took her to wife. And after God brought me out of my father’s house, I said to her: Thou shalt do me this kindness: In every place, to which we shall come, thou shalt say that I am thy brother.

Genesis 11:26-29

And Thare lived seventy years, and begot Abram, and Nachor, and Aran. And these are the generations of Thare: Thare begot Abram, Nachor, and Aran. And Aran begot Lot. And Aran died before Thare his father, in the land of his nativity in Ur of the Chaldees. And Abram and Nachor married wives: the name of Abram’s wife was Sarai: and the name of Nachor’s wife, Melcha, the daughter of Aran, father of Melcha, and father of Jescha. -

Genesis 19:31-36

And the elder said to the younger Our father is old, and there is no man left on the earth, to come in unto us after the manner of the whole earth. Come, let us make him drunk with wine, and let us lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the elder went in and lay with her father: but he perceived not neither when his daughter lay down, nor when she rose up.

And the next day the elder said to the younger: Behold I lay last night with my father, let us make him drink wine also to night, and thou shalt lie with him, that we may save seed of our father. They made their father drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in, and lay with him: and neither then did he perceive when she lay down, nor when she rose up. So the two daughters of Lot were with child by their father.

Exodus 6:19-20

 The sons of Merari: Moholi and Musi. These are the kindreds of Levi by their families. 20 And Amram took to wife Jochabed his aunt by the father’s side: and she bore him Aaron and Moses. And the years of Amram’s life were a hundred and thirty-seven.

II Kings 13:12-14

And Thamar came to the house of Amnon her brother: but he was laid down: and she took meal and tempered it: and dissolving it in his sight she made little messes. And taking what she had boiled, she poured it out, and set it before him, but he would not eat: and Amnon said: Put out all persons from me.

And when they had put all persons out, Amnon said to Thamar: Bring the mess into the chamber, that I may eat at thy hand. And when she had presented him the meat, he took hold of her, and said: Come lie with me, my sister. She answered him: Do not so, my brother, do not force me: for no such thing must be done in Israel. Do not thou this folly. But he would not hearken to her prayers, but being stronger overpowered her and lay with her.

No?

Didn't think so.

The fact is literature is jam-packed with stuff that we wouldn't want done in real life. Horrific murders are par for the course in most popular books, and yet the readers haven't yet turned into a horde of psychopaths.

In our thoughts, we can be free to do anything at all, no matter how appalling - because it doesn't hurt anyone, and harming someone should be the basis of moral laws.

If no harm is done, don't worry about it; a thought is not a deed.

Only a few companies control most of the ebooks in the world, and thanks to the fact they lease, not sell, they can recall those books and erase them with impunity.

They won't act against something like the Bible -  they wouldn't dare - but if they can censor perfectly legal books like this, you can be damn sure they can do the same with other books, perhaps a little too critical of a sponsor or a government they like.

Can another publisher be found, one with better free speech policies? Or is the stranglehold on ebooks they hold too strong?

Time will tell, and there's a heavy price if we get it wrong.

Why I Need Men's Rights

Oratorasaurus' quick answer


My answer?

Well, I'm an egalitarian and an MRA. I want a world without double standards.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DoubleStandardAbuseFemaleOnMale
, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZAuqkqxk9A, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/why-are-there-such-double-standards.html

Did you know that female rape is legally erased by the clever use of definitions?

http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/rape-erasure-blog-reblogged.html

RAINN uses the dodgy definition and is endlessly quoted as evidence of the perversity of men. At the same time, women get lighter sentences and are coddled by the media for acts of sexual perversity http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/female-pedophiles-get-weekend-detention.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/lesbians-need-to-be-taught-not-to-rape.html

In India, recently, the definition of rape was legally changed to mean no woman could be charged with it. http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/a-sad-day-for-male-rape-victims-in-india/
https://archive.is/jaJRz 6 May 2015 03:36:54 UTC

 In Israel, feminists agitated to make sure the immunity remained on the books there. http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape
https://archive.is/SkIjG  8 Aug 2015 11:34:52 UTC

The ratio of rape victims is actually pretty close to 1:1 for male and females. http://www.genderratic.com/p/836/manufacturing-female-victimhood-and-marginalizing-vulnerable-men/

I want legal equality, which means that if there's a domestic dispute, my sex isn't an issue (and it is in the US, the arrest guidelines are to arrest 1 party, and it's the taller one, which usually means the man). http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/primary-or-predominant-aggressor-laws.html

I want to know I'm relatively safe when I have sex that I won't have a false accusation of rape (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/false-rape-accusations.html)..

..that if i'm drunk and they're drunk, and the law says drunk people can't consent, either we both should be charged - or neither. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/08/women-cannot-consent-because-they-are.html, http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/consent-continued.html

I want to know my life is as valued as a woman's. When i look at the money invested in breast cancer vs prostate cancer, or in domestic violence shelters, or the opposition to universal, rather than male-only conscription, I don't see it at all. Men are disposable.

Going from the imagery google presents, females perpetrating DV is non-existent.

Almost all police and governmental campaigns show
heterosexual relationships,
male perp,
female victim
- even when a woman massacred her seven kids and her niece.
Or eight of her own children.

I've talked to criminologists who claimed there were NO cases of DV where a woman was at fault. None.


 I know first hand that's only happening because they ignore them. Legal support is gender specific. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/why-dont-men-in-australia-get-same-path.html


I'm hoping my friend has a better outcome, but i can tell you that even with voice recordings of threats, he still couldn't get an AVO  - police protection from his ex - and she still shares custody despite a history of violence. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/men-in-sweden-are-at-least-as-likely.html


I want Men’s reproductive rights

    Right to know one is, or will be a father.
    Right to Legal Paternal Surrender.
    Right to Ownership of Person (i.e. semen, c.f. Woman Used Sperm From Oral Sex To Get Pregnant, Gets Child Support for example).

Right to know you’re a father, right to determine you’re not ready to be a father, and right to prosecute those who misuse your semen to their own ends.

I never, ever want to see a headline like this again, but I know I will because men and male sexuality is demonised now, men are seen as filthy rape monsters, barely restrained but always close to the edge . http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/boy-15-kills-himself-after-facing.html

I want to see an end to the Duluth model (http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/tthe-duluth-model-of-misandry.html), which says that only women should be parents, and which was instituted by feminists.

It's the reason men are so bitter about child custody. It's resulted in situations where a woman can rape a child - then demand payments for the offspring. http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/a-12-year-old-boy-can-be-raped-then.html

Woman, 18, charged with boy's rape at church

In my country, aboriginal men are arrested for possessing pornography that is perfectly legal for anyone else... the belief that male sexuality is dangerous, and that our masturbation aids must be destroyed, our penises mutilated, our gaze lowered, and all sexual advances prohibited, is a weird combination of christian and feminist beliefs.

We live in a time when men are forever told they are unwanted - "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" - "my vibrator is better than your body!"

I cannot imagine a woman would ever hear the equivalent of those statements.

I remember when men could feel pride, could feel desired, and were willing to fight and die for this country.

Most young men now seem somewhat ashamed of being born. Or they radicalise, either becoming MRAs, or religious fanatics. Religion offers self-worth to men -put at a terrible price. Look at the young men in the US who became muslim terrorists - why do you think they found that lethal ideology appealing?

I have to wonder, when men are taught they are worthless.. why should they put their neck on the line for women? Why should they have to die to protect a system that claims they are useless? Why should any man be intimate with a woman who says he is unwanted? Or who at least, doesn't oppose her Sisters who claim he is?

Finally, we live in a time when my speech - my opposition to feminism - looks like it will become a crime in some countries like Sweden, a ban which looks to be spreading-  and such speech -which i hope you will agree is nonviolent - has been used to ban youtube and other social media accounts.


http://brettcaton.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/should-laws-be-passed-to-suppress.html Violence is being used to stifle the expression of people like me.

So even if you don't believe a single word of anything I have said, ask yourself this:

What violence have MRA groups done?

https://youtu.be/FWxAljFlb-c

What violence is being done to MRAs?

Isn't opposing that violence and allowing free speech the reason we fought against the fascists in WW2? The reason that millions of people died, and yet we still counted that sacrifice as worthwhile? Will it all have been in vain?

Men and women... are people. No better, no worse. Fellow travellers on the road of humanity, equal sharers of the land and sky. That is the single truth of Men's Rights. And that is why you need it too.

The Nonconsensual Sexualization of the Sexual Sexosystemssssss

From Antifeminist Egalitarian

27th Aug 2013 | 5,315 notes

misandry-mermaid:

“Let’s say a woman is trying to be seductive. What the hell makes you think you’re the one she’s trying to seduce? And if you aren’t, what the hell makes you think you have any right to shove yourself into her business?

Your thoughts are your own: you are free to notice her, think about her, fantasize, etc.–you are not free to involve her, through actions or words that disclose what’s going on in your pants, unless she specifically consents and makes it clear.

It astonishes me to no end that men have a problem with this. A lot of guys wouldn’t appreciate being hit on by someone they’re not interested in–but they expect women to accept it.”

— Nahida S.N., The Nonconsensual Sexualization of Unintending Young Women (via cyberteeth)

Let’s say every person in the world believes this. Let’s say one of those people, a woman, is trying to be seductive. None of the men or women around her can be sure who she’s trying to seduce, so none of them approach her.

Eventually she decides that she will just have to approach the man she’s trying to seduce. She does, and she starts to flirt with him.

He is outraged. “How dare you approach me?! Does it look like I’m trying to seduce you?! I’m just trying to have a beer with some friends!” He looks her up and down. “I might have been interested in you, if you hadn’t actually approached me and made it clear that your were interested in me! Get away from me you pervert!”

All of the man’s friends echo his sentiments, and a security guard, noticing the hubbub, swiftly removes the seductive woman from the premises. “If you’re going to incite disorderly behaviour with such inappropriate sexual innuendo, you’re not welcome here.”

All across the world men and women alike are having similar experiences to the seductive woman. Sex is extremely rare, but everybody wanks a lot while having fantasies about each other. Politicians are panicking because reproduction has all but ceased, and birth rates are plummeting. Eventually, the human race becomes extinct.

In the last moments of her life, the last human alive thinks to herself, probably in Chinese, “why did feminists have to be offended by ordinary human social interactions?”

---

Boy, 15, kills himself after 'facing expulsion and being put on sex offender registry' for streaking

He was wearing a sock.. you know who also did that?


Were they arrested, branded for life?

Of course not.

"He was arrested and school district recommended he face a court hearing
If convicted of indecent exposure, he'd have gone on sex offenders list"


The sex offenders list... for streaking?

He'd have been regarded as unsafe to be near children and denied a lot of work. 

A creep, a pervert, a rapist.

 

I grew up when streaking regularly happened at sporting events. People would laugh, or see it as a nuisance, but they didn't feel damaged.



He'd have been marked for life. For doing something we used to regard as a silly prank, or even a political protest. The sex offenders list. Did what they propose fit the crime?

Isn't that what punishment is supposed to do?

In 1973, what the press called a "streaking epidemic" hit Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches, Texas, with streakers being seen in residence halls, at football games and at various other on-campus locations and events, including Spring graduation.

The trend continued until spring 1974, when Ralph W. Steen, University president, hoping to end the streaking fad, designated a day to streak the length of East College Street, a tradition that - with a few breaks - has continued to this day. (source)

 I have to wonder.. would he have been treated as harshly if he'd been a she? Or would it have been seen as a bit of a joke?

Oh, right..

It was.

Chanting RAPE CULTURE RAPE CULTURE RAPE CULTURE does not make it real

Rape culture, in the west, is a myth. If there was any truth to it, then the boys wouldn't have been punished.

Well, it's a myth to an extent... when women rape, it's not even acknowledged as such by the FBI. It's not even counted as a crime in many countries thanks to changes made by Feminists recently. 

Even in Israel.

Even in the UK!

When women rape, they ARE coddled, excuses are made by the media, Feminists and even judges, their childhood investigated to find out who victimised them into doing such an unnatural thing.

Their sentences, when they are convicted, are shorter. Their prison conditions.. better. Baroness Corston dedicated her life to closing women's prisons, because the poor dears don't deserve to be punished, not like those filthy men.

And in rape trials men are guilty unless proven innocent, despite false allegations ranging up to 90%.

So what do I see here? I see a woman so smug in her self-entitlement and professional victimhood that she is happy to rage males for a system that punishes males for an act universally condemned ... by males. That refuses to acknowledge female on female rape can possibly even exist, let alone be common.

I see a man so lost in internalised misandry that he will fight to the death to protect a woman's right to rape without consequence, or accuse him of rape without evidence. 

These people chant their dogma, hoping you will believe, oh yea! -  believe, brothers and sisters!

Well, here's something I ask you to try instead.

Rape Erasure blog reblogged!

I've done my best to represent the conversational flow accurately. Tumblr was never designed with serious discussions in mind.

It's interesting to see that Female Supremacists simply do not care about the truth; they'll create statistics on a whim, and edit quotes to better suit their needs. Socrates was just a dead white male, in their book, and it really does show.

jungs-endless-shadow reblogged abunchofassholes

Follow

anarcha-pie Source:

anonymous asked:

You always talk about how bad rape is. You are absolutely right but you completely erase male victims. Women rape too. It is rare but it exists and if you really are against rape, you can not erase a victim group.

anarcha-pie answered:

Lol 99.7% of rapes are perpetrated by males. Rape is a form of male violence.

 

stfueverything:-
BUT WHAT ABOUT TEH MENNNNNZZZZ!!!Isn’t it amazing how they constantly ignore that, and make it out to be like we’re the bad ones because we “ignore” male victims. No assholes, you’re ignoring male perpetrators. 

 Also, male rape victims are very nearly always raped by males.  By saying “but..but the women rape tooooo” and ignoring male perpetrators you are, in fact “erasing your own victim group”

  
karmainmyeye:-
 So let me get this straight; 
You’ve come to the conclusion that almost 100% of rapists are men. You’ve done this by using a definition of rape that exclusively defines rape as something only men can do.

Such mental gymnastics. Gold medal for you.

e-tank:- 

Nope.     
 I used this definition:

"Rape is sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person’s consent.”  

As you can see the base definition of rape has nothing to do with the gender of the perpetrator.

Then I looked at the statistics and percentages of rape of females by males and rape of males by males:  99%

Then I looked at the statistics and percentages of rape of males by females and rape of females by females: 1%  (BTW .7% of that 1% is female/female)

Then I said, “rape victims are very nearly always raped by males.” Behold my mental gymnastics!

Now I’ll say that rape is predominately a form of male violence.  if you believe that the .3% of rapes committed by females on male victims negates that statement then you’re delusional. 
karmainmyeye:-

The statistics are based off of that definition. The Bureau of Justice website where feminists’ favourite cherrypicked statistic comes from is currently down, but Wikipedia will do just fine.

 Let me show you a thing. 

The U.S Bureau of Justice Statistics, which defines rape as penetration by the offender, states that 91% of rape victims are female and 9% are male, and 99% of rapists are male.

You see that right there?

I don’t think I need to elaborate on how this clearly states “only men can rape”. Forced envelopment and other forms of rape are excluded entirely, which by extension means that female rapists and their victims are swept under the rug and ignored.

Go find a new statistic, because that one is complete trash.

e-tank:- 
Nope. 

I gave you the statistics by studies defining rape as such.

"Rape is sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person’s consent.” The stats are based on that definition.  

But if that’s not good enough I’ll use your own source.

"The FBI changed the definition from  ”The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” for their annual Uniform Crime Reports.

The definition, which had remained unchanged since 1927, was considered outdated and narrow. 

The updated definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men, recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape, and includes instances in which the victim is unable to give consent because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity, and recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated and thus unable to consent because of ingestion of drugs or alcohol.”  

And even then 99% of rapes are still committed by males.  No matter how much you want rapists to be 50% male and 50% female the fact is that if you get raped there is a 99% chance you are getting raped by a male regardless of your gender.

1. ^ Jump up to:^a b c "Rape". Merriam-Webster. April 15, 2011.
2. ^ Jump up to:^a b "Sexual violence chapter 6". World Health Organization. April 15, 2011.
3. Jump up^ "Rape". dictionary.reference.com. April 15, 2011.
4. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} "Rape". legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com. April 15, 2011.
5. ^ Jump up to:^a b "Rape at the National Level, number of police recorded offenses".United Nations.
6. Jump up^ American Medical Association (1995) Sexual Assault in America. AMA.
7. ^ Jump up to:^a b c "A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-12-31.
8. Jump up^ "UCSC Rape Prevention Education: Rape Statistics". www2.ucsc.edu. Retrieved 2008-01-01. The study was conducted in Detroit, USA.
9. Jump up^ Abbey, A., BeShears, R., Clinton-Sherrod, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 323–332."Similarities and differences in women’s sexual assault experiences based on tactics used by the perpetrator". Retrieved 10 December 2007.
10. Jump up^ "Statistics | Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network". www.rainn.org. Retrieved 2008-01-01.^ Human Rights WatchNo Escape: Male Rape In U.S. Prisons. Part VII. Anomaly or Epidemic: The Incidence of Prisoner-on-Prisoner Rape.; estimates that 100,000–140,000 violent male-male rapes occur in U.S. prisons annually; compare with FBI statistics that estimate 90,000 violent male-female rapes occur annually.

 karmainmyeye:-You are ACTUALLY this fucking dense. I can’t believe it. At this point I can’t tell if you’re wilfully ignorant or if you’re just deliberately spouting misinformation. 

The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.
  
This is the current definition as of January 2012. It says so right here. And as recently as May 2013, an FAQ was posted about that definition. It’s still current and is still used by law enforcement agencies.

I also find it hilarious that you copy-pasted the paragraph from the Wikipedia page on rape and doctored it to try to make it look like the current definition is gender-equal and not based on penetration. 

What you posted;

"The FBI changed the definition from  ”The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” for their annual Uniform Crime Reports.

The definition, which had remained unchanged since 1927, was considered outdated and narrow. The updated definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men, recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape, and includes instances in which the victim is unable to give consent because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity, and recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated and thus unable to consent because of ingestion of drugs or alcohol.”

And here’s what the page actually says. The bolded portion is the section of text you removed.

In 2012, the FBI changed their definition from "The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." to “The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” for their annual Uniform Crime Reports.

The definition, which had remained unchanged since 1927, was considered outdated and narrow. The updated definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men, recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape, includes instances in which the victim is unable to give consent because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity, and recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated and thus unable to consent because of ingestion of drugs or alcohol.

Intellectual dishonesty from a feminist. I’m shocked. 

In short, the legal federal definition essentially states that only men can rape, and thus excludes female rapists. This protects female rapists from any form of punishment and greatly skews statistics to the point of invalidating them; all statistics based on that definition (such as the 99% you keep spouting) as well as statistics based on conviction or arrest rates are completely useless and unusable.

And for your “sources”;

^ Jump up to:^abc"Rape". Merriam-Webster. April 15, 2011.

The dictionary definition isn’t the same as the legal federal definition. This source is completely irrelevant.

^ Jump up to:^a b "Sexual violence chapter 6". World Health Organization. April 15, 2011.

It took me about 3 seconds to find this;

Sexual violence includes rape, defined as physically forced or otherwise coerced penetration – even if slight – of the vulva or anus, using a penis, other body parts or an object.

They define rape as requiring penetration. Useless.

Jump up^ "Rape". dictionary.reference.com. April 15, 2011.
^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e} "Rape". legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com. April 15, 2011.

More random dictionary sites. Still not relevant - not until you can find a source that uses these definitions as their definition of rape and bases their statistics off of said definitions. You haven’t yet.

^ Jump up to:^a b "Rape at the National Level, number of police recorded offenses".United Nations.

I can’t read this document without Microsoft Excel.

Jump up^ American Medical Association (1995) Sexual Assault in America. AMA.

18 years old, no link to anything. Next.

^ Jump up to:^abc"A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases" (PDF). Retrieved 2010-12-31.

UK government website, therefore uses UK government definition. I wonder what that is?

Rape has been redefined from the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (amended in 1976 and 1994) to read:

A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

>strictly gendered definition
lol bye

Jump up^ "UCSC Rape Prevention Education: Rape Statistics". www2.ucsc.edu. Retrieved 2008-01-01. The study was conducted in Detroit, USA.

This 404’d.  How about you try actually checking the sources instead of just copy-pasting from the references on Wikipedia?

Jump up^ Abbey, A., BeShears, R., Clinton-Sherrod, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 323–332."Similarities and differences in women’s sexual assault experiences based on tactics used by the perpetrator". Retrieved 10 December 2007.

This whole thing defines rape as something men do to women. There is gendered language everywhere. Pass.

Jump up^ "Statistics | Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network". www.rainn.org. Retrieved 2008-01-01.^ Human Rights Watch

RAINN is hilarious. Not only do they deliberately fudge numbers to further their own agenda, but the sources in their statistics pages regarding rape all link to either outdated information or US government sources, meaning it’s all based on penetration. Bye.

No Escape: Male Rape In U.S. Prisons. Part VII. Anomaly or Epidemic: The Incidence of Prisoner-on-Prisoner Rape.; estimates that 100,000–140,000 violent male-male rapes occur in U.S. prisons annually; compare with FBI statistics that estimate 90,000 violent male-female rapes occur annually.

I like how the only time a feminist mentions prison rape, it’s for the sake of pushing some “only men are rapists” bullshit.

I don’t really get what you’re trying to say by copy-pasting that wiki source. I mean when you take the most dangerous men in the country and throw them all into one place where they’re cooped up for years and years it’s not really all that surprising that rape runs rampant in there?

Also;

From here. Table 2.1 and 2.2 on pages 18 and 19.

Just as many men rape women as women rape men. The CDC just doesn’t classify forced envelopment as “rape” for some reason. But yeah, you’re wrong about everything. Get dunked.

e-tank:-
Really good breakdown of a fucking shitstain who really went out of their way to erase male rape victims

Like jesus christ, did you ever stop to think to yourself:

"Hey"

"I am literally editing the content of my sources to make a rape definition look more gender neutral, so I can deny that male rape victims are erased, which will score brownie points for my political agenda"

Did that ever cross your mind or is this sort of willful ignorance just a sort of instinctive behavior in some types?

Do you just not even realize what you’re doing as you do it?