One of the key claims of #feminism is that there are no biological differences between males and females, and differences in gender roles happen because men are innately wicked. (Yes, I'm aware that's logically inconsistent).
The problem is that almost all scientists disagree.
The response is therefore to discredit science, and/or infiltrate with feminists who will put dogma before observation.
A scientist must look at the facts and form a hypothesis.
A feminist already knows what the result of any given experiment should be - whatever the feminist theorists say it is - and it's a matter of chopping or stretching the facts until they conform - the bed of Procrustes applies to all!
So faced with biological differences in the brains of boys and girls, feminist educators have a dilemma; these two must be the same; they are not the same; what do?
The answer seems to be to 'medicate' the boys until they behave like girls; to sedate them with ADHD drugs until they are roughly like girls - but inferior. The resulting test scores in the current generation of boys continues to decline, yet no feminist sees this as a problem; if boys do badly when treated like girls, that is simply further proof of their inferiority.
A scientist must look at the facts and form a hypothesis.
So faced with biological differences in the brains of boys and girls, feminist educators have a dilemma; these two must be the same; they are not the same; what do?
The answer seems to be to 'medicate' the boys until they behave like girls; to sedate them with ADHD drugs until they are roughly like girls - but inferior. The resulting test scores in the current generation of boys continues to decline, yet no feminist sees this as a problem; if boys do badly when treated like girls, that is simply further proof of their inferiority.
No comments:
Post a Comment